国家一级卫生技术评估进程的全球概况:对104个国家的调查

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Andrew J. Mirelman, Kratu Goel, Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer
{"title":"国家一级卫生技术评估进程的全球概况:对104个国家的调查","authors":"Andrew J. Mirelman,&nbsp;Kratu Goel,&nbsp;Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer","doi":"10.1016/j.hpopen.2025.100138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To make progress towards universal health coverage (UHC), countries need to be able to develop and implement evidence-informed<!--> <!-->and inclusive processes for decision-making to inform what services are provided and purchased.<!--> <!-->Health Technology Assessment (HTA) processes are an established mechanism to support evidence-informed decision-making in the health sector. To assess the practice of HTA in countries, WHO conducted a global survey that explores the status of HTA. The survey is the largest source of information in terms of number of countries<!--> <!-->for describing global<!--> <!-->HTA status. The final sample analysed in this paper is the 104 countries (82% or 104/127) that responded “yes” to the question of having a systematic, formal health decision-making process at the national level. The results show that while many countries have HTA bodies in place, these serve different functions. While there are more established processes in higher income country groups, even those show room for improvement in areas such as social participation and appeals. Lack of awareness of the importance of HTA and institutionalization were the top two barriers to HTA utilization. There is further progress that needs to be made in HTA globally. Countries need to build on available guidance to ensure the appropriate elements are in place for sustainable country decision-making processes and develop more understanding of how they vary across settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34527,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy Open","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100138"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The global landscape of country-level health technology assessment processes: A survey among 104 countries\",\"authors\":\"Andrew J. Mirelman,&nbsp;Kratu Goel,&nbsp;Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hpopen.2025.100138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>To make progress towards universal health coverage (UHC), countries need to be able to develop and implement evidence-informed<!--> <!-->and inclusive processes for decision-making to inform what services are provided and purchased.<!--> <!-->Health Technology Assessment (HTA) processes are an established mechanism to support evidence-informed decision-making in the health sector. To assess the practice of HTA in countries, WHO conducted a global survey that explores the status of HTA. The survey is the largest source of information in terms of number of countries<!--> <!-->for describing global<!--> <!-->HTA status. The final sample analysed in this paper is the 104 countries (82% or 104/127) that responded “yes” to the question of having a systematic, formal health decision-making process at the national level. The results show that while many countries have HTA bodies in place, these serve different functions. While there are more established processes in higher income country groups, even those show room for improvement in areas such as social participation and appeals. Lack of awareness of the importance of HTA and institutionalization were the top two barriers to HTA utilization. There is further progress that needs to be made in HTA globally. Countries need to build on available guidance to ensure the appropriate elements are in place for sustainable country decision-making processes and develop more understanding of how they vary across settings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Policy Open\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Policy Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590229625000036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590229625000036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了在实现全民健康覆盖方面取得进展,各国需要能够制定和实施循证和包容性的决策进程,以便为提供和购买哪些服务提供信息。卫生技术评估(HTA)过程是支持卫生部门循证决策的既定机制。为了评估各国HTA的做法,世卫组织进行了一项全球调查,探讨了HTA的现状。就国家数量而言,该调查是描述全球卫生保健机构状况的最大信息来源。本文分析的最后一个样本是104个国家(82%或104/127),它们对在国家一级建立系统、正式的卫生决策过程的问题回答“是”。结果表明,虽然许多国家都设有卫生保健机构,但这些机构的职能各不相同。虽然在高收入国家群体中有更成熟的程序,但即使这些程序在社会参与和呼吁等领域也显示出改进的余地。缺乏对HTA重要性的认识和制度化是HTA利用的两大障碍。在全球范围内,HTA需要取得进一步进展。各国需要以现有的指导为基础,确保具备可持续国家决策进程的适当要素,并进一步了解这些要素在不同环境下的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The global landscape of country-level health technology assessment processes: A survey among 104 countries
To make progress towards universal health coverage (UHC), countries need to be able to develop and implement evidence-informed and inclusive processes for decision-making to inform what services are provided and purchased. Health Technology Assessment (HTA) processes are an established mechanism to support evidence-informed decision-making in the health sector. To assess the practice of HTA in countries, WHO conducted a global survey that explores the status of HTA. The survey is the largest source of information in terms of number of countries for describing global HTA status. The final sample analysed in this paper is the 104 countries (82% or 104/127) that responded “yes” to the question of having a systematic, formal health decision-making process at the national level. The results show that while many countries have HTA bodies in place, these serve different functions. While there are more established processes in higher income country groups, even those show room for improvement in areas such as social participation and appeals. Lack of awareness of the importance of HTA and institutionalization were the top two barriers to HTA utilization. There is further progress that needs to be made in HTA globally. Countries need to build on available guidance to ensure the appropriate elements are in place for sustainable country decision-making processes and develop more understanding of how they vary across settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Policy Open
Health Policy Open Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信