砂土中土-管相互作用的光弹性分析及解析近似

IF 3.4 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Gökhan Cevikbilen, Tugba Kuru, Akif Kutlu, Osman Bulut
{"title":"砂土中土-管相互作用的光弹性分析及解析近似","authors":"Gökhan Cevikbilen,&nbsp;Tugba Kuru,&nbsp;Akif Kutlu,&nbsp;Osman Bulut","doi":"10.1002/nag.3977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In-situ stress condition is an important aspect of buried unpressurized pipelines. Empirical approaches used for preliminary design are usually based on observations, which may be associated with some errors related to the measurement method. The photoelastic approach represents an alternative, nonintrusive measurement technique to model the plane stress-strain behavior of buried pipes under different surcharge and groundwater conditions. Based on this approach, two model tests <i>M1</i> and <i>M2</i> were conducted to demonstrate the effects of soil arching on a pipe model buried in river sand and manufactured sand, which have similar granulometry but different angularity. In the dry state, the higher arching effect between the round particles of the river sand leads to a lower settlement and a smaller change in the stress and diameter of the pipe in <i>M1</i> compared to <i>M2</i>. The finite element analysis confirms the experimental results quite well, while Iowa formula is sufficient to represent the diameter changes. However, after a loading and unloading cycle, <i>M1</i> shows larger settlements at saturation due to the loss of arching effect in contrast to <i>M2</i>. The redistribution of the round particles and the re-arching in a denser state lead to a huge stress relief in the pipe of <i>M1</i>, while the interlocked angular particles prevent the diameter changes, so that the stresses observed in the pipe are mainly maintained in <i>M2</i> at unloading and saturation. Finally, a practical analytical model to determine the pipe deformation for the dry condition problem is proposed.</p>","PeriodicalId":13786,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","volume":"49 9","pages":"2145-2160"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/nag.3977","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Analysis of Soil–Pipe Interaction in Sand by Photoelastic Approach and an Analytical Approximation\",\"authors\":\"Gökhan Cevikbilen,&nbsp;Tugba Kuru,&nbsp;Akif Kutlu,&nbsp;Osman Bulut\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nag.3977\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In-situ stress condition is an important aspect of buried unpressurized pipelines. Empirical approaches used for preliminary design are usually based on observations, which may be associated with some errors related to the measurement method. The photoelastic approach represents an alternative, nonintrusive measurement technique to model the plane stress-strain behavior of buried pipes under different surcharge and groundwater conditions. Based on this approach, two model tests <i>M1</i> and <i>M2</i> were conducted to demonstrate the effects of soil arching on a pipe model buried in river sand and manufactured sand, which have similar granulometry but different angularity. In the dry state, the higher arching effect between the round particles of the river sand leads to a lower settlement and a smaller change in the stress and diameter of the pipe in <i>M1</i> compared to <i>M2</i>. The finite element analysis confirms the experimental results quite well, while Iowa formula is sufficient to represent the diameter changes. However, after a loading and unloading cycle, <i>M1</i> shows larger settlements at saturation due to the loss of arching effect in contrast to <i>M2</i>. The redistribution of the round particles and the re-arching in a denser state lead to a huge stress relief in the pipe of <i>M1</i>, while the interlocked angular particles prevent the diameter changes, so that the stresses observed in the pipe are mainly maintained in <i>M2</i> at unloading and saturation. Finally, a practical analytical model to determine the pipe deformation for the dry condition problem is proposed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics\",\"volume\":\"49 9\",\"pages\":\"2145-2160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/nag.3977\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nag.3977\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nag.3977","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地应力状态是地下非加压管道的一个重要方面。用于初步设计的经验方法通常基于观察,这可能与测量方法相关的一些误差有关。光弹性方法代表了一种替代的、非侵入式的测量技术,可以模拟不同地表和地下水条件下埋地管道的平面应力-应变行为。在此基础上,进行了M1和M2两个模型试验,验证了土拱对河砂和人造砂中埋管模型的影响,这两种砂的粒度相似,但角度不同。在干燥状态下,河砂圆形颗粒之间的拱效应越强,M1处的沉降量越小,管道的应力和直径变化也比M2小。有限元分析较好地证实了试验结果,而爱荷华公式足以表示直径的变化。然而,经过一个加载和卸载循环后,由于拱效应的损失,M1在饱和时的沉降比M2大。圆形颗粒的重新分布和致密状态下的再拱导致M1管道内的应力大量释放,而互锁的角状颗粒阻止了直径的变化,因此在卸载和饱和状态下,管道内观察到的应力主要维持在M2。最后,提出了一种确定干燥条件下管道变形的实用解析模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Analysis of Soil–Pipe Interaction in Sand by Photoelastic Approach and an Analytical Approximation

In-situ stress condition is an important aspect of buried unpressurized pipelines. Empirical approaches used for preliminary design are usually based on observations, which may be associated with some errors related to the measurement method. The photoelastic approach represents an alternative, nonintrusive measurement technique to model the plane stress-strain behavior of buried pipes under different surcharge and groundwater conditions. Based on this approach, two model tests M1 and M2 were conducted to demonstrate the effects of soil arching on a pipe model buried in river sand and manufactured sand, which have similar granulometry but different angularity. In the dry state, the higher arching effect between the round particles of the river sand leads to a lower settlement and a smaller change in the stress and diameter of the pipe in M1 compared to M2. The finite element analysis confirms the experimental results quite well, while Iowa formula is sufficient to represent the diameter changes. However, after a loading and unloading cycle, M1 shows larger settlements at saturation due to the loss of arching effect in contrast to M2. The redistribution of the round particles and the re-arching in a denser state lead to a huge stress relief in the pipe of M1, while the interlocked angular particles prevent the diameter changes, so that the stresses observed in the pipe are mainly maintained in M2 at unloading and saturation. Finally, a practical analytical model to determine the pipe deformation for the dry condition problem is proposed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The journal welcomes manuscripts that substantially contribute to the understanding of the complex mechanical behaviour of geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, ice, snow, and powders), through innovative experimental techniques, and/or through the development of novel numerical or hybrid experimental/numerical modelling concepts in geomechanics. Topics of interest include instabilities and localization, interface and surface phenomena, fracture and failure, multi-physics and other time-dependent phenomena, micromechanics and multi-scale methods, and inverse analysis and stochastic methods. Papers related to energy and environmental issues are particularly welcome. The illustration of the proposed methods and techniques to engineering problems is encouraged. However, manuscripts dealing with applications of existing methods, or proposing incremental improvements to existing methods – in particular marginal extensions of existing analytical solutions or numerical methods – will not be considered for review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信