甲氨蝶呤降压治疗类风湿性关节炎(STEMETRA):一项证明短期高剂量甲氨蝶呤有效性和安全性的试点研究。

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Monica Pendolino, Teodora Serban, Giorgia Ferrari, Paola Diana, Antonia Locaputo, Dario Camellino, Andrea Giusti, Gerolamo Bianchi
{"title":"甲氨蝶呤降压治疗类风湿性关节炎(STEMETRA):一项证明短期高剂量甲氨蝶呤有效性和安全性的试点研究。","authors":"Monica Pendolino, Teodora Serban, Giorgia Ferrari, Paola Diana, Antonia Locaputo, Dario Camellino, Andrea Giusti, Gerolamo Bianchi","doi":"10.55563/clinexprheumatol/kv54k5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Methotrexate (MTX) is the cornerstone of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment, showing a suitable efficacy-safety profile, relatively low-cost, and versatile dosages and routes of administration. However, there are no clear indications yet on the optimal use of MTX in RA, whereas existing recommendations disagree on relevant aspects. STEMETRA is a 16-week open-label, monocentric, pilot study aimed at evaluating the efficacy and the safety of a step-down strategy of using subcutaneous (sc) MTX in patients with RA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study consists of the administration of a starting dose of MTX 50 mg sc/week for 4 weeks, to be subsequently reduced to 15 mg/week in a 12-week period. Fifteen RA patients naive to any disease specific therapy were enrolled.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One patient was lost to follow-up after week 12, 4 patients withdrew because of adverse events, therefore, 10 patients concluded the study. Mean DAS28(CRP) at baseline was 5.6 (±0.37 SE), whereas, at week 16, mean DAS28(CRP) was 1.6 (±0.41SE). Most patients who concluded the study achieved ACR70 response and remission (7 out of 10), whereas three still showed moderate disease activity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, the step-down MTX approach was effective in inducing remission in most of the patients enrolled, without increasing the risk of adverse events. Thus, short-term higher dosages of MTX could be more effective in reaching remission earlier. Nonetheless, these results should be confirmed in larger populations of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10274,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"841-846"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"STEp-down approach in MEthotrexate use for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (STEMETRA): a pilot study demonstrating efficacy and safety of short-term, high dose methotrexate.\",\"authors\":\"Monica Pendolino, Teodora Serban, Giorgia Ferrari, Paola Diana, Antonia Locaputo, Dario Camellino, Andrea Giusti, Gerolamo Bianchi\",\"doi\":\"10.55563/clinexprheumatol/kv54k5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Methotrexate (MTX) is the cornerstone of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment, showing a suitable efficacy-safety profile, relatively low-cost, and versatile dosages and routes of administration. However, there are no clear indications yet on the optimal use of MTX in RA, whereas existing recommendations disagree on relevant aspects. STEMETRA is a 16-week open-label, monocentric, pilot study aimed at evaluating the efficacy and the safety of a step-down strategy of using subcutaneous (sc) MTX in patients with RA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study consists of the administration of a starting dose of MTX 50 mg sc/week for 4 weeks, to be subsequently reduced to 15 mg/week in a 12-week period. Fifteen RA patients naive to any disease specific therapy were enrolled.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One patient was lost to follow-up after week 12, 4 patients withdrew because of adverse events, therefore, 10 patients concluded the study. Mean DAS28(CRP) at baseline was 5.6 (±0.37 SE), whereas, at week 16, mean DAS28(CRP) was 1.6 (±0.41SE). Most patients who concluded the study achieved ACR70 response and remission (7 out of 10), whereas three still showed moderate disease activity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, the step-down MTX approach was effective in inducing remission in most of the patients enrolled, without increasing the risk of adverse events. Thus, short-term higher dosages of MTX could be more effective in reaching remission earlier. Nonetheless, these results should be confirmed in larger populations of patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10274,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and experimental rheumatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"841-846\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and experimental rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/kv54k5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/kv54k5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:甲氨蝶呤(MTX)是类风湿关节炎(RA)治疗的基石,显示出合适的有效性和安全性,相对低成本,以及多种剂量和给药途径。然而,甲氨蝶呤在RA中的最佳使用尚无明确的适应症,而现有的建议在相关方面存在分歧。STEMETRA是一项为期16周的开放标签、单中心、试点研究,旨在评估在RA患者中使用皮下(sc) MTX的降压策略的有效性和安全性。方法:该研究的起始剂量为MTX 50 mg sc/周,持续4周,随后在12周内减少至15 mg/周。15例未接受任何疾病特异性治疗的RA患者入组。结果:12周后1例患者失访,4例患者因不良事件退出,10例患者退出研究。基线时平均DAS28(CRP)为5.6(±0.37 SE),而在第16周时,平均DAS28(CRP)为1.6(±0.41SE)。大多数结束研究的患者达到了ACR70反应和缓解(10人中有7人),而3人仍然表现出中度疾病活动。结论:在这项研究中,降压MTX方法在大多数入组患者中有效地诱导缓解,而不会增加不良事件的风险。因此,短期较高剂量的甲氨蝶呤可能更有效地达到早期缓解。尽管如此,这些结果应该在更大的患者群体中得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
STEp-down approach in MEthotrexate use for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (STEMETRA): a pilot study demonstrating efficacy and safety of short-term, high dose methotrexate.

Objectives: Methotrexate (MTX) is the cornerstone of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment, showing a suitable efficacy-safety profile, relatively low-cost, and versatile dosages and routes of administration. However, there are no clear indications yet on the optimal use of MTX in RA, whereas existing recommendations disagree on relevant aspects. STEMETRA is a 16-week open-label, monocentric, pilot study aimed at evaluating the efficacy and the safety of a step-down strategy of using subcutaneous (sc) MTX in patients with RA.

Methods: The study consists of the administration of a starting dose of MTX 50 mg sc/week for 4 weeks, to be subsequently reduced to 15 mg/week in a 12-week period. Fifteen RA patients naive to any disease specific therapy were enrolled.

Results: One patient was lost to follow-up after week 12, 4 patients withdrew because of adverse events, therefore, 10 patients concluded the study. Mean DAS28(CRP) at baseline was 5.6 (±0.37 SE), whereas, at week 16, mean DAS28(CRP) was 1.6 (±0.41SE). Most patients who concluded the study achieved ACR70 response and remission (7 out of 10), whereas three still showed moderate disease activity.

Conclusions: In this study, the step-down MTX approach was effective in inducing remission in most of the patients enrolled, without increasing the risk of adverse events. Thus, short-term higher dosages of MTX could be more effective in reaching remission earlier. Nonetheless, these results should be confirmed in larger populations of patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
18.90%
发文量
377
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology is a bi-monthly international peer-reviewed journal which has been covering all clinical, experimental and translational aspects of musculoskeletal, arthritic and connective tissue diseases since 1983.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信