Carlos Fernandez Teruel, Marie Cullberg, Ignacio González-García, Gaia Schiavon, Diansong Zhou
{"title":"支持新型 AKT 抑制剂 capivasertib 剂量的暴露安全性分析。","authors":"Carlos Fernandez Teruel, Marie Cullberg, Ignacio González-García, Gaia Schiavon, Diansong Zhou","doi":"10.1007/s00280-025-04775-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate capivasertib exposure-response relationships for clinical safety events to support dosage selection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 277 patients with solid tumors participating in three phase 1 studies were analyzed. Capivasertib 80-800 mg was administered as monotherapy orally twice daily (BID) on continuous or intermittent (4 days on, 3 days off [4/3] or 2 days on, 5 days off [2/5]) schedules. Relationships between exposure related metrics (dose, weekly dose, AUC, AUC<sub>PWD</sub>, C<sub>max</sub>, and C<sub>min</sub>) and probability of safety endpoints (adverse event [AE] leading to dose discontinuation, AE leading to dose modification, serious AE [SAE], AE grade ≥ 3, AE grade ≥ 1, diarrhea AE grade ≥ 2, rash AE grade ≥ 2, hyperglycemia AE grade ≥ 3 and increased blood glucose > 13.9 mmol/L) were evaluated by logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant exposure-response relationships were identified for all safety endpoints evaluated, except for AE grade ≥ 1. The analysis suggested that most of the safety endpoints are driven by the total weekly exposure, whereas glucose elevations are driven by the exposure achieved within a dosing interval. The probability of experiencing an AE leading to dose discontinuation, AE leading to dose modification, SAE, AE grade ≥ 3, diarrhea or rash were lower with the 480 mg BID [4/3] schedule than with the 320 mg BID continuous schedule.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant exposure-response relationships were identified for safety endpoints when capivasertib was administered to patients with solid tumors suggesting that the intermittent [4/3] schedule is better tolerated than the continuous schedule due to lower total weekly exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":9556,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology","volume":"95 1","pages":"48"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11953117/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An exposure-safety analysis to support the dosage of the novel AKT inhibitor capivasertib.\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Fernandez Teruel, Marie Cullberg, Ignacio González-García, Gaia Schiavon, Diansong Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00280-025-04775-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate capivasertib exposure-response relationships for clinical safety events to support dosage selection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 277 patients with solid tumors participating in three phase 1 studies were analyzed. Capivasertib 80-800 mg was administered as monotherapy orally twice daily (BID) on continuous or intermittent (4 days on, 3 days off [4/3] or 2 days on, 5 days off [2/5]) schedules. Relationships between exposure related metrics (dose, weekly dose, AUC, AUC<sub>PWD</sub>, C<sub>max</sub>, and C<sub>min</sub>) and probability of safety endpoints (adverse event [AE] leading to dose discontinuation, AE leading to dose modification, serious AE [SAE], AE grade ≥ 3, AE grade ≥ 1, diarrhea AE grade ≥ 2, rash AE grade ≥ 2, hyperglycemia AE grade ≥ 3 and increased blood glucose > 13.9 mmol/L) were evaluated by logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant exposure-response relationships were identified for all safety endpoints evaluated, except for AE grade ≥ 1. The analysis suggested that most of the safety endpoints are driven by the total weekly exposure, whereas glucose elevations are driven by the exposure achieved within a dosing interval. The probability of experiencing an AE leading to dose discontinuation, AE leading to dose modification, SAE, AE grade ≥ 3, diarrhea or rash were lower with the 480 mg BID [4/3] schedule than with the 320 mg BID continuous schedule.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant exposure-response relationships were identified for safety endpoints when capivasertib was administered to patients with solid tumors suggesting that the intermittent [4/3] schedule is better tolerated than the continuous schedule due to lower total weekly exposure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9556,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"95 1\",\"pages\":\"48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11953117/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-025-04775-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-025-04775-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
An exposure-safety analysis to support the dosage of the novel AKT inhibitor capivasertib.
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate capivasertib exposure-response relationships for clinical safety events to support dosage selection.
Methods: Data from 277 patients with solid tumors participating in three phase 1 studies were analyzed. Capivasertib 80-800 mg was administered as monotherapy orally twice daily (BID) on continuous or intermittent (4 days on, 3 days off [4/3] or 2 days on, 5 days off [2/5]) schedules. Relationships between exposure related metrics (dose, weekly dose, AUC, AUCPWD, Cmax, and Cmin) and probability of safety endpoints (adverse event [AE] leading to dose discontinuation, AE leading to dose modification, serious AE [SAE], AE grade ≥ 3, AE grade ≥ 1, diarrhea AE grade ≥ 2, rash AE grade ≥ 2, hyperglycemia AE grade ≥ 3 and increased blood glucose > 13.9 mmol/L) were evaluated by logistic regression.
Results: Significant exposure-response relationships were identified for all safety endpoints evaluated, except for AE grade ≥ 1. The analysis suggested that most of the safety endpoints are driven by the total weekly exposure, whereas glucose elevations are driven by the exposure achieved within a dosing interval. The probability of experiencing an AE leading to dose discontinuation, AE leading to dose modification, SAE, AE grade ≥ 3, diarrhea or rash were lower with the 480 mg BID [4/3] schedule than with the 320 mg BID continuous schedule.
Conclusion: Significant exposure-response relationships were identified for safety endpoints when capivasertib was administered to patients with solid tumors suggesting that the intermittent [4/3] schedule is better tolerated than the continuous schedule due to lower total weekly exposure.
期刊介绍:
Addressing a wide range of pharmacologic and oncologic concerns on both experimental and clinical levels, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology is an eminent journal in the field. The primary focus in this rapid publication medium is on new anticancer agents, their experimental screening, preclinical toxicology and pharmacology, single and combined drug administration modalities, and clinical phase I, II and III trials. It is essential reading for pharmacologists and oncologists giving results recorded in the following areas: clinical toxicology, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, drug interactions, and indications for chemotherapy in cancer treatment strategy.