“边说边走”:非正式住区社会可持续移动解决方案的共同设计

IF 2.7 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Karen Lucas , Winnie Mitullah , Sharmin Nasrin , Farzana Rahman , Romanus Opiyo , Emma Tsoneva
{"title":"“边说边走”:非正式住区社会可持续移动解决方案的共同设计","authors":"Karen Lucas ,&nbsp;Winnie Mitullah ,&nbsp;Sharmin Nasrin ,&nbsp;Farzana Rahman ,&nbsp;Romanus Opiyo ,&nbsp;Emma Tsoneva","doi":"10.1016/j.urbmob.2025.100112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Walking is globally acknowledged as a primary form of active mobility for health promotion and social wellbeing, and for climate change mitigation. This paper offers alternative perspectives on walking within informal settlements based on collaborative participatory research with the residents of two low-income urban settlements in Dhaka, Bangladesh and Nairobi, Kenya. The methodology was designed to capture participants’ everyday mobility experiences and to explore how these affect their livelihoods and daily activities. It identifies that walking facilities within settlements and connections with the formal city are unanimously described as inadequate and unsafe by residents, with unpaved roads and footpaths, and temporarily built bridges. Footpaths obstructed by waste and inadequate drainage ditches intensify these poor walking environments during rainy seasons when flooding makes walking almost impossible. As such, walking is seen as the option of least choice by these walking-dependent communities, to be replaced by motorised travel wherever it can be afforded, which is a direct challenge to sustainable urban mobility objectives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100852,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Mobility","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100112"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Talk the Walk’: The co-design of socially sustainable mobility solutions in informal settlements\",\"authors\":\"Karen Lucas ,&nbsp;Winnie Mitullah ,&nbsp;Sharmin Nasrin ,&nbsp;Farzana Rahman ,&nbsp;Romanus Opiyo ,&nbsp;Emma Tsoneva\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urbmob.2025.100112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Walking is globally acknowledged as a primary form of active mobility for health promotion and social wellbeing, and for climate change mitigation. This paper offers alternative perspectives on walking within informal settlements based on collaborative participatory research with the residents of two low-income urban settlements in Dhaka, Bangladesh and Nairobi, Kenya. The methodology was designed to capture participants’ everyday mobility experiences and to explore how these affect their livelihoods and daily activities. It identifies that walking facilities within settlements and connections with the formal city are unanimously described as inadequate and unsafe by residents, with unpaved roads and footpaths, and temporarily built bridges. Footpaths obstructed by waste and inadequate drainage ditches intensify these poor walking environments during rainy seasons when flooding makes walking almost impossible. As such, walking is seen as the option of least choice by these walking-dependent communities, to be replaced by motorised travel wherever it can be afforded, which is a direct challenge to sustainable urban mobility objectives.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Urban Mobility\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Urban Mobility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667091725000147\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Mobility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667091725000147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

步行是全球公认的促进健康和社会福祉以及减缓气候变化的一种主要的主动流动形式。本文基于对孟加拉国达卡和肯尼亚内罗毕两个低收入城市住区居民的合作参与性研究,提供了非正式住区内步行的另一种视角。该方法旨在捕捉参与者的日常移动体验,并探索这些体验如何影响他们的生计和日常活动。该报告指出,居民一致认为,定居点内的步行设施以及与正式城市的联系不足且不安全,道路和人行道没有铺设,临时建造的桥梁也没有铺设。人行道被垃圾堵塞,排水沟不足,在雨季洪水泛滥,几乎无法行走时,这些恶劣的步行环境更加恶化。因此,步行被这些依赖步行的社区视为最不可行的选择,在任何可以负担得起的地方,都将被机动出行所取代,这是对可持续城市交通目标的直接挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘Talk the Walk’: The co-design of socially sustainable mobility solutions in informal settlements
Walking is globally acknowledged as a primary form of active mobility for health promotion and social wellbeing, and for climate change mitigation. This paper offers alternative perspectives on walking within informal settlements based on collaborative participatory research with the residents of two low-income urban settlements in Dhaka, Bangladesh and Nairobi, Kenya. The methodology was designed to capture participants’ everyday mobility experiences and to explore how these affect their livelihoods and daily activities. It identifies that walking facilities within settlements and connections with the formal city are unanimously described as inadequate and unsafe by residents, with unpaved roads and footpaths, and temporarily built bridges. Footpaths obstructed by waste and inadequate drainage ditches intensify these poor walking environments during rainy seasons when flooding makes walking almost impossible. As such, walking is seen as the option of least choice by these walking-dependent communities, to be replaced by motorised travel wherever it can be afforded, which is a direct challenge to sustainable urban mobility objectives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信