Anthony P. Nunes, Heeyoon Jung, Yiyang Yuan, Jonggyu Baek, Jayne Pawasauskas, Anne L. Hume, Shao-Hsien Liu, Kate L. Lapane
{"title":"短效阿片类药物剂量递增与长效阿片类药物起始在养老院居民中的安全性比较。","authors":"Anthony P. Nunes, Heeyoon Jung, Yiyang Yuan, Jonggyu Baek, Jayne Pawasauskas, Anne L. Hume, Shao-Hsien Liu, Kate L. Lapane","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>For patients with continued pain while receiving an initial course of a short-acting opioid (SAO), clinicians may intensify the opioid regimen by escalating the SAO dose or initiating a long-acting opioid (LAO). The objective of this study was to assess the comparative safety of opioid intensification regimens in nursing home residents with nonmalignant pain.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of US long-stay nursing home residents identified from the national Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 and linked Medicare data, 2011–2016. Opioid regimen changes were assessed using Part D claims to identify dose escalation of SAO, adding LAO to SAO, or a switch from SAO to LAO. The outcomes of interest were hospitalized falls/fractures and delirium identified in the MDS or hospitalization. Resident attributes were described by opioid regimen. Hazard ratios of study outcomes were quantified using as-treated (primary analysis) and intent-to-treat (secondary analysis) doubly robust inverse probability of treatment (IPT) weighted Fine & Gray regression models with a competing risk of death.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In the as-treated analysis, relative to residents in the SAO escalation cohort, the hazard of delirium was elevated in the LAO cohorts (aHR [LAO switch]: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.57–2.67; aHR [LAO add-on]: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.23–1.96). Results for falls and fractures were inconclusive. We did not observe evidence of an association with falls and fractures in the primary as-treated analysis; however, the intent-to-treat analysis observed increased hazards in the LAO switch cohort relative to the SAO escalation cohort (aHR 2.86, 95% CI:1.64–4.99).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>There is limited evidence to inform the clinical judgment between escalating the SAO dose or incorporating a LAO. Our study suggests increased risks of delirium in nursing home residents with nonmalignant pain when switching or adding an LAO to the opioid regimen relative to increasing the dose of SAOs.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"73 5","pages":"1517-1527"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Safety of Short-Acting Opioid Dose Escalation and Long-Acting Opioid Initiation in Nursing Home Residents\",\"authors\":\"Anthony P. Nunes, Heeyoon Jung, Yiyang Yuan, Jonggyu Baek, Jayne Pawasauskas, Anne L. Hume, Shao-Hsien Liu, Kate L. Lapane\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgs.19417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>For patients with continued pain while receiving an initial course of a short-acting opioid (SAO), clinicians may intensify the opioid regimen by escalating the SAO dose or initiating a long-acting opioid (LAO). The objective of this study was to assess the comparative safety of opioid intensification regimens in nursing home residents with nonmalignant pain.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of US long-stay nursing home residents identified from the national Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 and linked Medicare data, 2011–2016. Opioid regimen changes were assessed using Part D claims to identify dose escalation of SAO, adding LAO to SAO, or a switch from SAO to LAO. The outcomes of interest were hospitalized falls/fractures and delirium identified in the MDS or hospitalization. Resident attributes were described by opioid regimen. Hazard ratios of study outcomes were quantified using as-treated (primary analysis) and intent-to-treat (secondary analysis) doubly robust inverse probability of treatment (IPT) weighted Fine & Gray regression models with a competing risk of death.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In the as-treated analysis, relative to residents in the SAO escalation cohort, the hazard of delirium was elevated in the LAO cohorts (aHR [LAO switch]: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.57–2.67; aHR [LAO add-on]: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.23–1.96). Results for falls and fractures were inconclusive. We did not observe evidence of an association with falls and fractures in the primary as-treated analysis; however, the intent-to-treat analysis observed increased hazards in the LAO switch cohort relative to the SAO escalation cohort (aHR 2.86, 95% CI:1.64–4.99).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>There is limited evidence to inform the clinical judgment between escalating the SAO dose or incorporating a LAO. Our study suggests increased risks of delirium in nursing home residents with nonmalignant pain when switching or adding an LAO to the opioid regimen relative to increasing the dose of SAOs.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"volume\":\"73 5\",\"pages\":\"1517-1527\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19417\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19417","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative Safety of Short-Acting Opioid Dose Escalation and Long-Acting Opioid Initiation in Nursing Home Residents
Background
For patients with continued pain while receiving an initial course of a short-acting opioid (SAO), clinicians may intensify the opioid regimen by escalating the SAO dose or initiating a long-acting opioid (LAO). The objective of this study was to assess the comparative safety of opioid intensification regimens in nursing home residents with nonmalignant pain.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of US long-stay nursing home residents identified from the national Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 and linked Medicare data, 2011–2016. Opioid regimen changes were assessed using Part D claims to identify dose escalation of SAO, adding LAO to SAO, or a switch from SAO to LAO. The outcomes of interest were hospitalized falls/fractures and delirium identified in the MDS or hospitalization. Resident attributes were described by opioid regimen. Hazard ratios of study outcomes were quantified using as-treated (primary analysis) and intent-to-treat (secondary analysis) doubly robust inverse probability of treatment (IPT) weighted Fine & Gray regression models with a competing risk of death.
Results
In the as-treated analysis, relative to residents in the SAO escalation cohort, the hazard of delirium was elevated in the LAO cohorts (aHR [LAO switch]: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.57–2.67; aHR [LAO add-on]: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.23–1.96). Results for falls and fractures were inconclusive. We did not observe evidence of an association with falls and fractures in the primary as-treated analysis; however, the intent-to-treat analysis observed increased hazards in the LAO switch cohort relative to the SAO escalation cohort (aHR 2.86, 95% CI:1.64–4.99).
Conclusions
There is limited evidence to inform the clinical judgment between escalating the SAO dose or incorporating a LAO. Our study suggests increased risks of delirium in nursing home residents with nonmalignant pain when switching or adding an LAO to the opioid regimen relative to increasing the dose of SAOs.
期刊介绍:
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) is the go-to journal for clinical aging research. We provide a diverse, interprofessional community of healthcare professionals with the latest insights on geriatrics education, clinical practice, and public policy—all supporting the high-quality, person-centered care essential to our well-being as we age. Since the publication of our first edition in 1953, JAGS has remained one of the oldest and most impactful journals dedicated exclusively to gerontology and geriatrics.