机械通气患者的代理人和医生在两个时间点的预后预测。

IF 2.7 Q4 Medicine
Critical care explorations Pub Date : 2025-03-26 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001235
Benjamin Dufour, Hannah M Duehren, Ashley Eaton England, Kevin Keuper, Thomas V Quinn, Raj C Shah, Quyen M Diep, James Gerhart, Jared A Greenberg
{"title":"机械通气患者的代理人和医生在两个时间点的预后预测。","authors":"Benjamin Dufour, Hannah M Duehren, Ashley Eaton England, Kevin Keuper, Thomas V Quinn, Raj C Shah, Quyen M Diep, James Gerhart, Jared A Greenberg","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The decisions surrogates and physicians make for incapacitated critically ill patients depend in part on their expectations for patient recovery. We sought to determine whether the accuracy of surrogate and physician outcome predictions made during the ICU stay improves over time.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Survey study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic Medical Center.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Surrogates and physicians of 100 mechanically ventilated patients from March 2018 to April 2019.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>At the end of the first week of mechanical ventilation and 1 week later, participants indicated on visual analog scales (0-100%) expectations that the patient would require mechanical ventilation in 1 month, require artificial nutrition in 1 month, be alive in 3 months, and be living at home in 3 months. Patient status was determined at 1 and 3 months.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) were determined for each outcome, at each time point. Patients who died within the first month were considered to require mechanical ventilation and artificial nutrition in the primary analysis. AUROCs for initial surrogate predictions were 0.61 (95% CI, 0.50-0.72) for mechanical ventilation, 0.67 (95% CI, 0.56-0.78) for artificial nutrition, 0.66 (95% CI, 0.55-0.7) for survival, and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.50-0.73) for living at home. AUROCs for initial physician predictions were 0.60 (95% CI, 0.49-0.71) for mechanical ventilation, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.61-0.0.83) for artificial nutrition, 0.69 (95% CI, 0.59-0.80) for survival, and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.66-0.85) for living at home. Average expectations among surrogates and physicians were highly stable over time; adjustments made to expectations did not result in more accurate predictions for the measured outcomes (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among surrogates and physicians of patients who were mechanically ventilated for 1 week, outcome predictions were better than would be expected by chance and not significantly improved 1 week later.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"7 4","pages":"e1235"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11949294/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome Predictions at Two Time Points among Surrogates and Physicians of Mechanically Ventilated Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Dufour, Hannah M Duehren, Ashley Eaton England, Kevin Keuper, Thomas V Quinn, Raj C Shah, Quyen M Diep, James Gerhart, Jared A Greenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The decisions surrogates and physicians make for incapacitated critically ill patients depend in part on their expectations for patient recovery. We sought to determine whether the accuracy of surrogate and physician outcome predictions made during the ICU stay improves over time.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Survey study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic Medical Center.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Surrogates and physicians of 100 mechanically ventilated patients from March 2018 to April 2019.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>At the end of the first week of mechanical ventilation and 1 week later, participants indicated on visual analog scales (0-100%) expectations that the patient would require mechanical ventilation in 1 month, require artificial nutrition in 1 month, be alive in 3 months, and be living at home in 3 months. Patient status was determined at 1 and 3 months.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) were determined for each outcome, at each time point. Patients who died within the first month were considered to require mechanical ventilation and artificial nutrition in the primary analysis. AUROCs for initial surrogate predictions were 0.61 (95% CI, 0.50-0.72) for mechanical ventilation, 0.67 (95% CI, 0.56-0.78) for artificial nutrition, 0.66 (95% CI, 0.55-0.7) for survival, and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.50-0.73) for living at home. AUROCs for initial physician predictions were 0.60 (95% CI, 0.49-0.71) for mechanical ventilation, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.61-0.0.83) for artificial nutrition, 0.69 (95% CI, 0.59-0.80) for survival, and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.66-0.85) for living at home. Average expectations among surrogates and physicians were highly stable over time; adjustments made to expectations did not result in more accurate predictions for the measured outcomes (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among surrogates and physicians of patients who were mechanically ventilated for 1 week, outcome predictions were better than would be expected by chance and not significantly improved 1 week later.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical care explorations\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"e1235\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11949294/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical care explorations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001235\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:代治者和医生为丧失行为能力的重症患者做出的决定部分取决于他们对患者康复的预期。我们试图确定在重症监护病房住院期间,代治者和医生对患者康复结果预测的准确性是否会随着时间的推移而提高:调查研究:地点:学术医疗中心:2018年3月至2019年4月期间100名机械通气患者的代治者和医生.干预:在机械通气第一周结束时和 1 周后,参与者用视觉模拟量表(0-100%)表示患者在 1 个月内需要机械通气、1 个月内需要人工营养、3 个月内存活以及 3 个月内居家生活的预期。患者状况在 1 个月和 3 个月时确定:在每个时间点确定了每种结果的接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)。在主要分析中,第一个月内死亡的患者被视为需要机械通气和人工营养。机械通气、人工营养、存活率和居家生活的初始替代预测值分别为 0.61(95% CI,0.50-0.72)、0.67(95% CI,0.56-0.78)、0.66(95% CI,0.55-0.7)和 0.61(95% CI,0.50-0.73)。医生对机械通气、人工营养、存活和居家生活的初始预测值分别为 0.60(95% CI,0.49-0.71)、0.72(95% CI,0.61-0.83)、0.69(95% CI,0.59-0.80)和 0.76(95% CI,0.66-0.85)。随着时间的推移,代治者和医生的平均期望值高度稳定;对期望值进行调整并不会导致对测量结果的预测更加准确(P > 0.05):结论:在接受机械通气 1 周的患者的代治者和医生中,对结果的预测优于偶然情况下的预期,但在 1 周后并无明显改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Outcome Predictions at Two Time Points among Surrogates and Physicians of Mechanically Ventilated Patients.

Outcome Predictions at Two Time Points among Surrogates and Physicians of Mechanically Ventilated Patients.

Outcome Predictions at Two Time Points among Surrogates and Physicians of Mechanically Ventilated Patients.

Outcome Predictions at Two Time Points among Surrogates and Physicians of Mechanically Ventilated Patients.

Objectives: The decisions surrogates and physicians make for incapacitated critically ill patients depend in part on their expectations for patient recovery. We sought to determine whether the accuracy of surrogate and physician outcome predictions made during the ICU stay improves over time.

Design: Survey study.

Setting: Academic Medical Center.

Subjects: Surrogates and physicians of 100 mechanically ventilated patients from March 2018 to April 2019.

Interventions: At the end of the first week of mechanical ventilation and 1 week later, participants indicated on visual analog scales (0-100%) expectations that the patient would require mechanical ventilation in 1 month, require artificial nutrition in 1 month, be alive in 3 months, and be living at home in 3 months. Patient status was determined at 1 and 3 months.

Measurements and main results: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) were determined for each outcome, at each time point. Patients who died within the first month were considered to require mechanical ventilation and artificial nutrition in the primary analysis. AUROCs for initial surrogate predictions were 0.61 (95% CI, 0.50-0.72) for mechanical ventilation, 0.67 (95% CI, 0.56-0.78) for artificial nutrition, 0.66 (95% CI, 0.55-0.7) for survival, and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.50-0.73) for living at home. AUROCs for initial physician predictions were 0.60 (95% CI, 0.49-0.71) for mechanical ventilation, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.61-0.0.83) for artificial nutrition, 0.69 (95% CI, 0.59-0.80) for survival, and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.66-0.85) for living at home. Average expectations among surrogates and physicians were highly stable over time; adjustments made to expectations did not result in more accurate predictions for the measured outcomes (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: Among surrogates and physicians of patients who were mechanically ventilated for 1 week, outcome predictions were better than would be expected by chance and not significantly improved 1 week later.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信