对数字心理健康干预措施的特征进行分类,为患者决策辅助工具的开发提供信息。

PLOS digital health Pub Date : 2025-03-26 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000752
Gemma Bradley, Lucia Rehackova, Kayleigh Devereaux, Tor Alexander Bruce, Victoria Nunn, Liam Gilfellon, Scott Burrows, Alisdair Cameron, Rose Watson, Katie Rumney, Darren Flynn
{"title":"对数字心理健康干预措施的特征进行分类,为患者决策辅助工具的开发提供信息。","authors":"Gemma Bradley, Lucia Rehackova, Kayleigh Devereaux, Tor Alexander Bruce, Victoria Nunn, Liam Gilfellon, Scott Burrows, Alisdair Cameron, Rose Watson, Katie Rumney, Darren Flynn","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) are a potential scalable solution to improve access to psychological support and therapies. DMHIs vary in terms of their features such as delivery systems (Websites or Apps) and function (information, monitoring, decision support or therapy) that are sensitive to the needs and preferences of users. A decision aid is warranted to empower people to make an informed preference-based choice of DMHIs. We conducted a review of features of DMHIs to embed within a patient decision aid to support shared decision-making. DMHIs, with evidence of availability in the United Kingdom (UK) at the time of the review, were identified from interactive meetings with a multi-disciplinary steering group, an online survey and interviews with adults with lived experience of using DMHIs in the UK. Eligible DMHIs targeted users age ≥16 years with a mental health condition(s), delivered through a digital system. A previous classification system for DMHIs was extended to eight dimensions (Target population; System; Function; Time; Facilitation; Duration and Intensity; and Research Evidence) to guide data extraction and synthesis of findings. Twenty four DMHIs were included in the review. More than half (n = 13, 54%) targeted people living with low mood, anxiety or depression and were primarily delivered via systems such as Apps or websites (or both). Most DMHIs offered one-way transmission of information (n = 21, 88%). Ten (42%) also had two-way communication (e.g., with a healthcare provider). Eighteen (75%) had a function of therapy, with seven and five DMHIs providing monitoring and decision support functions respectively. Most DMHIs were capable of being self-guided (n = 18,75%). Cost and access were primarily free, with some free via referral from the UK NHS or through corporate subscription for employees (n = 11). Eight (33%) DMHIs had evidence of effectiveness from randomised controlled trials. Six statements were developed to elicit user preferences on features of DMHIs: Target Population; Function; Time and Facilitation; System; Cost and Access; and Research Evidence. Preference elicitation statements have been embedded into a prototype decision aid for DMHIs, which will be subjected to acceptability and usability testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"4 3","pages":"e0000752"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11942417/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classifying the features of digital mental health interventions to inform the development of a patient decision aid.\",\"authors\":\"Gemma Bradley, Lucia Rehackova, Kayleigh Devereaux, Tor Alexander Bruce, Victoria Nunn, Liam Gilfellon, Scott Burrows, Alisdair Cameron, Rose Watson, Katie Rumney, Darren Flynn\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000752\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) are a potential scalable solution to improve access to psychological support and therapies. DMHIs vary in terms of their features such as delivery systems (Websites or Apps) and function (information, monitoring, decision support or therapy) that are sensitive to the needs and preferences of users. A decision aid is warranted to empower people to make an informed preference-based choice of DMHIs. We conducted a review of features of DMHIs to embed within a patient decision aid to support shared decision-making. DMHIs, with evidence of availability in the United Kingdom (UK) at the time of the review, were identified from interactive meetings with a multi-disciplinary steering group, an online survey and interviews with adults with lived experience of using DMHIs in the UK. Eligible DMHIs targeted users age ≥16 years with a mental health condition(s), delivered through a digital system. A previous classification system for DMHIs was extended to eight dimensions (Target population; System; Function; Time; Facilitation; Duration and Intensity; and Research Evidence) to guide data extraction and synthesis of findings. Twenty four DMHIs were included in the review. More than half (n = 13, 54%) targeted people living with low mood, anxiety or depression and were primarily delivered via systems such as Apps or websites (or both). Most DMHIs offered one-way transmission of information (n = 21, 88%). Ten (42%) also had two-way communication (e.g., with a healthcare provider). Eighteen (75%) had a function of therapy, with seven and five DMHIs providing monitoring and decision support functions respectively. Most DMHIs were capable of being self-guided (n = 18,75%). Cost and access were primarily free, with some free via referral from the UK NHS or through corporate subscription for employees (n = 11). Eight (33%) DMHIs had evidence of effectiveness from randomised controlled trials. Six statements were developed to elicit user preferences on features of DMHIs: Target Population; Function; Time and Facilitation; System; Cost and Access; and Research Evidence. Preference elicitation statements have been embedded into a prototype decision aid for DMHIs, which will be subjected to acceptability and usability testing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLOS digital health\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"e0000752\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11942417/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLOS digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000752\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数字心理健康干预(DMHIs)是一种潜在的可扩展解决方案,可改善心理支持和治疗的可及性。数字心理健康干预措施的特点各不相同,如交付系统(网站或应用程序)和功能(信息、监测、决策支持或治疗),这些都对用户的需求和偏好十分敏感。因此,有必要提供决策辅助工具,帮助人们在知情的基础上选择 DMHI。我们对 DMHIs 的特点进行了审查,以便将其嵌入患者决策辅助工具,支持共同决策。我们通过与多学科指导小组的互动会议、在线调查以及对英国有使用 DMHI 生活经验的成年人的访谈,确定了在审查时有证据表明在英国可用的 DMHI。符合条件的 DMHI 以年龄≥16 岁、患有精神疾病的用户为对象,通过数字系统提供服务。以前的 DMHIs 分类系统扩展到八个方面(目标人群、系统、功能、时间、便利性、持续时间和强度以及研究证据),以指导数据提取和研究结果的综合。24 项 DMHI 被纳入审查范围。半数以上(n = 13,54%)以情绪低落、焦虑或抑郁患者为对象,主要通过应用程序或网站(或两者)等系统提供。大多数 DMHI 提供单向信息传输(21 个,88%)。10种(42%)还提供双向交流(如与医疗服务提供者)。18台(75%)具有治疗功能,其中7台和5台分别具有监测和决策支持功能。大多数 DMHI 都能实现自我指导(n = 18,75%)。费用和使用方式主要是免费的,有些是通过英国国家医疗服务系统(NHS)的转诊或企业为员工订购的方式免费提供(n = 11)。有 8 项(33%)DMHI 具有随机对照试验的有效性证据。为了解用户对 DMHI 特点的偏好,我们制定了六项声明:目标人群、功能、时间和便利性、系统、成本和获取途径以及研究证据。偏好诱导声明已被嵌入到 DMHIs 的决策辅助原型中,该原型将接受可接受性和可用性测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Classifying the features of digital mental health interventions to inform the development of a patient decision aid.

Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) are a potential scalable solution to improve access to psychological support and therapies. DMHIs vary in terms of their features such as delivery systems (Websites or Apps) and function (information, monitoring, decision support or therapy) that are sensitive to the needs and preferences of users. A decision aid is warranted to empower people to make an informed preference-based choice of DMHIs. We conducted a review of features of DMHIs to embed within a patient decision aid to support shared decision-making. DMHIs, with evidence of availability in the United Kingdom (UK) at the time of the review, were identified from interactive meetings with a multi-disciplinary steering group, an online survey and interviews with adults with lived experience of using DMHIs in the UK. Eligible DMHIs targeted users age ≥16 years with a mental health condition(s), delivered through a digital system. A previous classification system for DMHIs was extended to eight dimensions (Target population; System; Function; Time; Facilitation; Duration and Intensity; and Research Evidence) to guide data extraction and synthesis of findings. Twenty four DMHIs were included in the review. More than half (n = 13, 54%) targeted people living with low mood, anxiety or depression and were primarily delivered via systems such as Apps or websites (or both). Most DMHIs offered one-way transmission of information (n = 21, 88%). Ten (42%) also had two-way communication (e.g., with a healthcare provider). Eighteen (75%) had a function of therapy, with seven and five DMHIs providing monitoring and decision support functions respectively. Most DMHIs were capable of being self-guided (n = 18,75%). Cost and access were primarily free, with some free via referral from the UK NHS or through corporate subscription for employees (n = 11). Eight (33%) DMHIs had evidence of effectiveness from randomised controlled trials. Six statements were developed to elicit user preferences on features of DMHIs: Target Population; Function; Time and Facilitation; System; Cost and Access; and Research Evidence. Preference elicitation statements have been embedded into a prototype decision aid for DMHIs, which will be subjected to acceptability and usability testing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信