新生基因:范式转变还是分子幻影?

IF 0.8 4区 生物学 Q4 BIOLOGY
Joseph Hannon
{"title":"新生基因:范式转变还是分子幻影?","authors":"Joseph Hannon","doi":"10.19272/202411402004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It has long been understood that new genes evolve from duplication events and subsequent divergence. Since 2006, however, many studies have argued that entire protein-coding genes can emerge \"from scratch\" by recruiting \"random\", non-coding and functionless sequences, contrary to what was thought possible. The hypothesis of \"de novo\" origination is used to explain why some genes do not possess homologs and appear to be lineagespecific \"orphans\". Some have been implicated in important evolutionary adaptations. Unfortunately, the new field is marred by theoretical problems, false positives, misleading claims and a failure to validate. Many de novo genes are likely to be derived from diverged fragments of older genes that have since been lost in most lineages or revived in one alone. Instead of scouring genomes for evidence of de novo gene birth, improvements in detection tools and methodologies are now urgently required.</p>","PeriodicalId":55980,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical Biology Forum","volume":"117 1-2","pages":"33-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"De novo genes: Paradigm Shift or Molecular Mirage?\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Hannon\",\"doi\":\"10.19272/202411402004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>It has long been understood that new genes evolve from duplication events and subsequent divergence. Since 2006, however, many studies have argued that entire protein-coding genes can emerge \\\"from scratch\\\" by recruiting \\\"random\\\", non-coding and functionless sequences, contrary to what was thought possible. The hypothesis of \\\"de novo\\\" origination is used to explain why some genes do not possess homologs and appear to be lineagespecific \\\"orphans\\\". Some have been implicated in important evolutionary adaptations. Unfortunately, the new field is marred by theoretical problems, false positives, misleading claims and a failure to validate. Many de novo genes are likely to be derived from diverged fragments of older genes that have since been lost in most lineages or revived in one alone. Instead of scouring genomes for evidence of de novo gene birth, improvements in detection tools and methodologies are now urgently required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55980,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theoretical Biology Forum\",\"volume\":\"117 1-2\",\"pages\":\"33-59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theoretical Biology Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19272/202411402004\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical Biology Forum","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19272/202411402004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们早就知道,新基因是从复制事件和随后的分化中进化而来的。然而,自2006年以来,许多研究认为,整个蛋白质编码基因可以通过招募“随机”、非编码和无功能的序列“从零开始”出现,这与人们认为的可能性相反。“从头开始”起源假说被用来解释为什么一些基因不具有同源物,似乎是谱系特定的“孤儿”。其中一些与重要的进化适应有关。不幸的是,这个新领域受到理论问题、误报、误导性声明和验证失败的损害。许多新生基因很可能来自于在大多数世系中丢失或仅在一个世系中复活的较老基因的分离片段。现在迫切需要改进检测工具和方法,而不是在基因组中寻找新生基因诞生的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
De novo genes: Paradigm Shift or Molecular Mirage?

It has long been understood that new genes evolve from duplication events and subsequent divergence. Since 2006, however, many studies have argued that entire protein-coding genes can emerge "from scratch" by recruiting "random", non-coding and functionless sequences, contrary to what was thought possible. The hypothesis of "de novo" origination is used to explain why some genes do not possess homologs and appear to be lineagespecific "orphans". Some have been implicated in important evolutionary adaptations. Unfortunately, the new field is marred by theoretical problems, false positives, misleading claims and a failure to validate. Many de novo genes are likely to be derived from diverged fragments of older genes that have since been lost in most lineages or revived in one alone. Instead of scouring genomes for evidence of de novo gene birth, improvements in detection tools and methodologies are now urgently required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Theoretical Biology Forum
Theoretical Biology Forum Agricultural and Biological Sciences-General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信