肝残余肥厚和术后结果:回顾性比较右门静脉节段栓塞和主静脉栓塞。

IF 1.2 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Elif Can, Aboelyazid Elkilany, Sophia Paparoditis, Bernhard Gebauer, Dominik Geisel, Felix Krenzien, Anne Pohrt, Wibke Uller, Michael Doppler, Sebastian Ebel, Holger Gößmann, Uli Fehrenbach
{"title":"肝残余肥厚和术后结果:回顾性比较右门静脉节段栓塞和主静脉栓塞。","authors":"Elif Can, Aboelyazid Elkilany, Sophia Paparoditis, Bernhard Gebauer, Dominik Geisel, Felix Krenzien, Anne Pohrt, Wibke Uller, Michael Doppler, Sebastian Ebel, Holger Gößmann, Uli Fehrenbach","doi":"10.1186/s42155-025-00537-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the efficacy of segmental right portal vein embolization (SRPVE) versus main right portal vein embolization (MRPVE) in preoperative preparation for major hepatectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center study included 220 consecutive patients who underwent portal vein embolization (PVE) before (extended) right hemihepatectomy between January 2014 and June 2021. Seventy-one patients underwent selective segmental embolization (SRPVE) and 149 patients underwent MRPVE. Volumetric analysis was conducted before PVE and before surgery. Key endpoints included evaluation of future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy, intraoperative complexity, and postoperative complications, technical success, clinical success, complications (Clavien-Dindo and CIRSE classifications), as well as evaluation of different factors which may influence hypertrophy of the FLR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Technical success rate was 100% in the SRPVE group and 99.3% in the MRPVE group (p = 0.15). Clinical success rate was comparable between both techniques, measuring 95.8% in the SRPVE group and 95.3% in the MRPVE group (p = 0.18). Absolute hypertrophy (FLRabh) of the FLR was comparable between both techniques, measuring 47.15% in the SRPVE group and 40.78% in the MRPVE group (p = 0.54). Complication rates did not differ significantly (p = 0.12). Partial thrombosis involving the left portal vein, main portal vein, or mesentericosplenic region was observed in 2.8% of the patients in the SRPVE group vs 3.4% in the MRPVE group (p = 0.95). CIRSE Class II-VI complications were slightly higher in the MRPVE group (10.7% vs 9.8%, p = 0.82). Postoperative complications with Clavien-Dindo class ≥ IIIa occurred in 10.1% % in the MRPVE group vs 9.9% the SRPVE group (p = 0.92). Liver cirrhosis had a significant negative correlation with sFLR % increase following PVE (r = -0.54; p = 0.027). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was also associated with reduced FLR hypertrophy following PVE, with a median sFLR% change of 63.8% (IQR: 60.8% - 75.2%) in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 66 patients, 30%) compared to 82.6% (IQR: 77.4% - 84.2%) in those without chemotherapy (n = 154 patients, 70%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Selective segmental right portal vein embolization, sparing the main right portal vein, offers a safe and effective alternative to MRPVE, achieving comparable FLR hypertrophy while potentially simplifying intraoperative procedures and reducing postprocedural complications. Future research should focus on conducting large, prospective, multicenter trials to further compare the long-term outcomes of this technique, particularly with regard to liver regeneration, postoperative liver function, complications and overall survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":52351,"journal":{"name":"CVIR Endovascular","volume":"8 1","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11950456/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Future liver remnant hypertrophy and postoperative outcomes: a retrospective comparison between segmental and main right portal vein embolization.\",\"authors\":\"Elif Can, Aboelyazid Elkilany, Sophia Paparoditis, Bernhard Gebauer, Dominik Geisel, Felix Krenzien, Anne Pohrt, Wibke Uller, Michael Doppler, Sebastian Ebel, Holger Gößmann, Uli Fehrenbach\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42155-025-00537-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the efficacy of segmental right portal vein embolization (SRPVE) versus main right portal vein embolization (MRPVE) in preoperative preparation for major hepatectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center study included 220 consecutive patients who underwent portal vein embolization (PVE) before (extended) right hemihepatectomy between January 2014 and June 2021. Seventy-one patients underwent selective segmental embolization (SRPVE) and 149 patients underwent MRPVE. Volumetric analysis was conducted before PVE and before surgery. Key endpoints included evaluation of future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy, intraoperative complexity, and postoperative complications, technical success, clinical success, complications (Clavien-Dindo and CIRSE classifications), as well as evaluation of different factors which may influence hypertrophy of the FLR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Technical success rate was 100% in the SRPVE group and 99.3% in the MRPVE group (p = 0.15). Clinical success rate was comparable between both techniques, measuring 95.8% in the SRPVE group and 95.3% in the MRPVE group (p = 0.18). Absolute hypertrophy (FLRabh) of the FLR was comparable between both techniques, measuring 47.15% in the SRPVE group and 40.78% in the MRPVE group (p = 0.54). Complication rates did not differ significantly (p = 0.12). Partial thrombosis involving the left portal vein, main portal vein, or mesentericosplenic region was observed in 2.8% of the patients in the SRPVE group vs 3.4% in the MRPVE group (p = 0.95). CIRSE Class II-VI complications were slightly higher in the MRPVE group (10.7% vs 9.8%, p = 0.82). Postoperative complications with Clavien-Dindo class ≥ IIIa occurred in 10.1% % in the MRPVE group vs 9.9% the SRPVE group (p = 0.92). Liver cirrhosis had a significant negative correlation with sFLR % increase following PVE (r = -0.54; p = 0.027). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was also associated with reduced FLR hypertrophy following PVE, with a median sFLR% change of 63.8% (IQR: 60.8% - 75.2%) in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 66 patients, 30%) compared to 82.6% (IQR: 77.4% - 84.2%) in those without chemotherapy (n = 154 patients, 70%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Selective segmental right portal vein embolization, sparing the main right portal vein, offers a safe and effective alternative to MRPVE, achieving comparable FLR hypertrophy while potentially simplifying intraoperative procedures and reducing postprocedural complications. Future research should focus on conducting large, prospective, multicenter trials to further compare the long-term outcomes of this technique, particularly with regard to liver regeneration, postoperative liver function, complications and overall survival.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CVIR Endovascular\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11950456/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CVIR Endovascular\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42155-025-00537-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CVIR Endovascular","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42155-025-00537-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价右门静脉段栓塞(SRPVE)与右门静脉主栓塞(MRPVE)在肝大切除术术前准备中的效果。方法:这项回顾性单中心研究纳入了2014年1月至2021年6月期间,在(扩展)右半肝切除术前连续接受门静脉栓塞(PVE)治疗的220例患者。71例患者行选择性节段栓塞术(SRPVE), 149例行MRPVE。在PVE前和手术前进行体积分析。关键终点包括评估未来残肝(FLR)肥厚、术中复杂性、术后并发症、技术成功、临床成功、并发症(Clavien-Dindo和CIRSE分类),以及评估可能影响残肝肥厚的不同因素。结果:SRPVE组技术成功率为100%,MRPVE组技术成功率为99.3% (p = 0.15)。两种方法的临床成功率相当,SRPVE组为95.8%,MRPVE组为95.3% (p = 0.18)。两种技术间FLR的绝对肥厚(FLRabh)相当,SRPVE组为47.15%,MRPVE组为40.78% (p = 0.54)。并发症发生率无显著差异(p = 0.12)。SRPVE组中有2.8%的患者出现左门静脉、门静脉主静脉或肠系膜-脾区部分血栓形成,MRPVE组为3.4% (p = 0.95)。MRPVE组CIRSE II-VI级并发症略高(10.7% vs 9.8%, p = 0.82)。MRPVE组术后并发症发生率为10.1%,而SRPVE组为9.9% (p = 0.92)。肝硬化与PVE后sFLR %升高呈显著负相关(r = -0.54;p = 0.027)。新辅助化疗也与PVE后FLR肥厚减少相关,接受新辅助化疗的患者(n = 66例,30%)的中位sFLR%变化为63.8% (IQR: 60.8% - 75.2%),而未接受化疗的患者(n = 154例,70%)的中位sFLR%变化为82.6% (IQR: 77.4% - 84.2%)。结论:选择性节段性右门静脉栓塞,保留右门静脉主静脉,是MRPVE的一种安全有效的替代方法,可实现与MRPVE相当的FLR肥厚,同时可能简化术中程序,减少术后并发症。未来的研究应侧重于开展大型、前瞻性、多中心试验,以进一步比较该技术的长期结果,特别是在肝再生、术后肝功能、并发症和总生存率方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Future liver remnant hypertrophy and postoperative outcomes: a retrospective comparison between segmental and main right portal vein embolization.

Objective: To assess the efficacy of segmental right portal vein embolization (SRPVE) versus main right portal vein embolization (MRPVE) in preoperative preparation for major hepatectomy.

Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 220 consecutive patients who underwent portal vein embolization (PVE) before (extended) right hemihepatectomy between January 2014 and June 2021. Seventy-one patients underwent selective segmental embolization (SRPVE) and 149 patients underwent MRPVE. Volumetric analysis was conducted before PVE and before surgery. Key endpoints included evaluation of future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy, intraoperative complexity, and postoperative complications, technical success, clinical success, complications (Clavien-Dindo and CIRSE classifications), as well as evaluation of different factors which may influence hypertrophy of the FLR.

Results: Technical success rate was 100% in the SRPVE group and 99.3% in the MRPVE group (p = 0.15). Clinical success rate was comparable between both techniques, measuring 95.8% in the SRPVE group and 95.3% in the MRPVE group (p = 0.18). Absolute hypertrophy (FLRabh) of the FLR was comparable between both techniques, measuring 47.15% in the SRPVE group and 40.78% in the MRPVE group (p = 0.54). Complication rates did not differ significantly (p = 0.12). Partial thrombosis involving the left portal vein, main portal vein, or mesentericosplenic region was observed in 2.8% of the patients in the SRPVE group vs 3.4% in the MRPVE group (p = 0.95). CIRSE Class II-VI complications were slightly higher in the MRPVE group (10.7% vs 9.8%, p = 0.82). Postoperative complications with Clavien-Dindo class ≥ IIIa occurred in 10.1% % in the MRPVE group vs 9.9% the SRPVE group (p = 0.92). Liver cirrhosis had a significant negative correlation with sFLR % increase following PVE (r = -0.54; p = 0.027). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was also associated with reduced FLR hypertrophy following PVE, with a median sFLR% change of 63.8% (IQR: 60.8% - 75.2%) in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 66 patients, 30%) compared to 82.6% (IQR: 77.4% - 84.2%) in those without chemotherapy (n = 154 patients, 70%).

Conclusion: Selective segmental right portal vein embolization, sparing the main right portal vein, offers a safe and effective alternative to MRPVE, achieving comparable FLR hypertrophy while potentially simplifying intraoperative procedures and reducing postprocedural complications. Future research should focus on conducting large, prospective, multicenter trials to further compare the long-term outcomes of this technique, particularly with regard to liver regeneration, postoperative liver function, complications and overall survival.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CVIR Endovascular
CVIR Endovascular Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信