动态梯形外固定:增强不稳定骨盆环骨折的暂时稳定性。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Dinah Bronstein, Geoffroy Dubois de Mont-Marin, Louis Rony, Guillaume David
{"title":"动态梯形外固定:增强不稳定骨盆环骨折的暂时稳定性。","authors":"Dinah Bronstein, Geoffroy Dubois de Mont-Marin, Louis Rony, Guillaume David","doi":"10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unstable pelvic fractures often require emergency temporary external fixation before definitive management by internal fixation. The objective of this study was to improve the stability of the posterior arc of the pelvic ring during the placement of a temporary external fixator.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>Did a temporary pelvic external fixator with dual bars (compression and distraction) enhances posterior pelvic stability by increasing posterior compression?</p><p><strong>Materials and method: </strong>Four supracetabular fixation setups, including a \"dynamic trapezoid external fixator\" (a supra-acetabular external fixation construct featuring two connecting rods, one in compression and the other in distraction), were tested on foam pelvis models with simulated sacroiliac disjunction. Each configuration was also tested with a supra-acetabular pin partially or fully inserted into the SA corridor. Stability was assessed using a biomechanical model through reproducible cranial and lateral traction force applied to the iliac tuberosity under a 20N load to identify the most effective temporary pelvic ring stabilization method. Each measurement was repeated 10 times per configuration. Student's t-test and two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the different models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sacroiliac displacement under vertical and lateral forces was measured for each configuration. Fully inserted supra-acetabular pins significantly reduced displacement compared to half insertion (p < 0.001). The \"dynamic\" construct exhibited the lowest displacement across all configurations (mean 2.9 ± 0.9 mm under lateral force; 1.8 ± 0.3 mm under vertical force). Compared to other constructs, it was significantly associated with superior stability (p < 0.005). ANOVA confirmed the effects of construct type (p < 0.0001) and SA pin length (p < 0.0001) on displacement, with the \"dynamic\" construct and full pin insertion yielding the best outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study demonstrates that a dynamic trapezoidal supra-acetabular external fixator, with rods in compression and distraction, enhances resistance to vertical and horizontal displacement of SI joint compared to other construct. Though not fully replicating in vivo conditions, this model supports a streamlined approach to temporary pelvic stabilization.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>V; In Vitro Research.</p>","PeriodicalId":54664,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","volume":" ","pages":"104234"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamic trapezoid external fixation: Enhancing temporary stability in unstable pelvic ring fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Dinah Bronstein, Geoffroy Dubois de Mont-Marin, Louis Rony, Guillaume David\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104234\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unstable pelvic fractures often require emergency temporary external fixation before definitive management by internal fixation. The objective of this study was to improve the stability of the posterior arc of the pelvic ring during the placement of a temporary external fixator.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>Did a temporary pelvic external fixator with dual bars (compression and distraction) enhances posterior pelvic stability by increasing posterior compression?</p><p><strong>Materials and method: </strong>Four supracetabular fixation setups, including a \\\"dynamic trapezoid external fixator\\\" (a supra-acetabular external fixation construct featuring two connecting rods, one in compression and the other in distraction), were tested on foam pelvis models with simulated sacroiliac disjunction. Each configuration was also tested with a supra-acetabular pin partially or fully inserted into the SA corridor. Stability was assessed using a biomechanical model through reproducible cranial and lateral traction force applied to the iliac tuberosity under a 20N load to identify the most effective temporary pelvic ring stabilization method. Each measurement was repeated 10 times per configuration. Student's t-test and two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the different models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sacroiliac displacement under vertical and lateral forces was measured for each configuration. Fully inserted supra-acetabular pins significantly reduced displacement compared to half insertion (p < 0.001). The \\\"dynamic\\\" construct exhibited the lowest displacement across all configurations (mean 2.9 ± 0.9 mm under lateral force; 1.8 ± 0.3 mm under vertical force). Compared to other constructs, it was significantly associated with superior stability (p < 0.005). ANOVA confirmed the effects of construct type (p < 0.0001) and SA pin length (p < 0.0001) on displacement, with the \\\"dynamic\\\" construct and full pin insertion yielding the best outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study demonstrates that a dynamic trapezoidal supra-acetabular external fixator, with rods in compression and distraction, enhances resistance to vertical and horizontal displacement of SI joint compared to other construct. Though not fully replicating in vivo conditions, this model supports a streamlined approach to temporary pelvic stabilization.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>V; In Vitro Research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"104234\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104234\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104234","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:不稳定骨盆骨折通常需要紧急临时外固定,然后再进行最终的内固定治疗。本研究的目的是在放置临时外固定架期间改善骨盆环后弧线的稳定性。假设:双棒临时骨盆外固定架(加压和撑开)是否通过增加后压迫来增强后骨盆稳定性?材料和方法:在模拟骶髂分离的泡沫骨盆模型上测试了四种髋臼上固定装置,包括“动态梯形外固定架”(一种具有两根连接杆的髋臼上外固定装置,一根处于压迫状态,另一根处于牵引状态)。将髋臼上针部分或全部插入SA通道,对每种构型进行测试。采用生物力学模型,通过在20N载荷下对髂粗隆施加可重复颅侧牵引力来评估稳定性,以确定最有效的临时骨盆环稳定方法。每个配置重复10次测量。采用学生t检验和双向方差分析(ANOVA)对不同模型进行比较。结果:测量了骶髂关节在垂直和侧向力作用下的位移。与半置入相比,完全置入髋臼上钉可显著减少移位(p < 0.001)。“动态”结构在所有构型中表现出最低的位移(平均2.9±0.9 mm);垂直力下1.8±0.3 mm)。与其他结构相比,它与优越的稳定性显著相关(p < 0.005)。方差分析证实了结构类型(p < 0.0001)和SA针长度(p < 0.0001)对位移的影响,其中“动态”结构和全针插入产生最佳结果。结论:我们的研究表明,与其他结构相比,带杆的动态梯形髋臼上外固定架可增强骶髂关节垂直和水平位移的抵抗能力。虽然不能完全复制体内条件,但该模型支持一种流线型的方法来暂时稳定骨盆。证据等级:V;体外研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dynamic trapezoid external fixation: Enhancing temporary stability in unstable pelvic ring fractures.

Background: Unstable pelvic fractures often require emergency temporary external fixation before definitive management by internal fixation. The objective of this study was to improve the stability of the posterior arc of the pelvic ring during the placement of a temporary external fixator.

Hypothesis: Did a temporary pelvic external fixator with dual bars (compression and distraction) enhances posterior pelvic stability by increasing posterior compression?

Materials and method: Four supracetabular fixation setups, including a "dynamic trapezoid external fixator" (a supra-acetabular external fixation construct featuring two connecting rods, one in compression and the other in distraction), were tested on foam pelvis models with simulated sacroiliac disjunction. Each configuration was also tested with a supra-acetabular pin partially or fully inserted into the SA corridor. Stability was assessed using a biomechanical model through reproducible cranial and lateral traction force applied to the iliac tuberosity under a 20N load to identify the most effective temporary pelvic ring stabilization method. Each measurement was repeated 10 times per configuration. Student's t-test and two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the different models.

Results: Sacroiliac displacement under vertical and lateral forces was measured for each configuration. Fully inserted supra-acetabular pins significantly reduced displacement compared to half insertion (p < 0.001). The "dynamic" construct exhibited the lowest displacement across all configurations (mean 2.9 ± 0.9 mm under lateral force; 1.8 ± 0.3 mm under vertical force). Compared to other constructs, it was significantly associated with superior stability (p < 0.005). ANOVA confirmed the effects of construct type (p < 0.0001) and SA pin length (p < 0.0001) on displacement, with the "dynamic" construct and full pin insertion yielding the best outcomes.

Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that a dynamic trapezoidal supra-acetabular external fixator, with rods in compression and distraction, enhances resistance to vertical and horizontal displacement of SI joint compared to other construct. Though not fully replicating in vivo conditions, this model supports a streamlined approach to temporary pelvic stabilization.

Level of evidence: V; In Vitro Research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
26.10%
发文量
329
审稿时长
12.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research (OTSR) publishes original scientific work in English related to all domains of orthopaedics. Original articles, Reviews, Technical notes and Concise follow-up of a former OTSR study are published in English in electronic form only and indexed in the main international databases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信