手术室数据的完整性。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Päivi Nurmela, Minna Marjetta Mykkänen, Ulla-Mari Kinnunen
{"title":"手术室数据的完整性。","authors":"Päivi Nurmela, Minna Marjetta Mykkänen, Ulla-Mari Kinnunen","doi":"10.1055/a-2566-7958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background In the operating theatre, a large collection of data is collected at each visit. Some of this data is patient information, some is related to resource management, which is linked to hospital finances. Poor quality data leads to poor decisions, impacting patient safety and the continuity of care. Objectives The study aimed to evaluate the completeness of data documented within surgical operations, and based on the results, the goal is to improve data quality and identify data management improvement ideas. Methods The study was a quantitative evaluation of 33,684 surgical visits, focusing on data omissions. The organization identified 58 operating room data variables related to visits, procedures, resources, and personnel. Data completeness was evaluated for 36 variables, excluding 47 visits with missing 'Complete' flags. Data preprocessing was done using Python and Pandas, with pseudonymization of personnel names. Data analyzing was done using the R programming language. Data omissions were coded as '1' for missing values and '0' for others. Summary variables were created to indicate the number of personnel and procedure, and data omissions per visit. Results The average completeness of the operating room data was 98%, which is considered excellent. However, seven variables - the start and end date and time of anesthesia, type of treatment, personnel group and assistant information - had completeness below the 95% target level. 34% of the surgical visits contained at least one data omission. In the yearly comparison the completeness values of variables were statistically significantly higher in 2022 compared to 2023. Conclusion By ensuring existing quality assurance practices, verifying internal data maintenance and verifying and standardizing documenting practices the organization can achieve net benefits through improved data completeness, enhancing patient records, financial information and management. Improved data quality will also benefit national and international registries. Keywords: data, patient data, quality, health information system, operating room.</p>","PeriodicalId":49822,"journal":{"name":"Methods of Information in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Completeness of the Operating Room Data.\",\"authors\":\"Päivi Nurmela, Minna Marjetta Mykkänen, Ulla-Mari Kinnunen\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2566-7958\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background In the operating theatre, a large collection of data is collected at each visit. Some of this data is patient information, some is related to resource management, which is linked to hospital finances. Poor quality data leads to poor decisions, impacting patient safety and the continuity of care. Objectives The study aimed to evaluate the completeness of data documented within surgical operations, and based on the results, the goal is to improve data quality and identify data management improvement ideas. Methods The study was a quantitative evaluation of 33,684 surgical visits, focusing on data omissions. The organization identified 58 operating room data variables related to visits, procedures, resources, and personnel. Data completeness was evaluated for 36 variables, excluding 47 visits with missing 'Complete' flags. Data preprocessing was done using Python and Pandas, with pseudonymization of personnel names. Data analyzing was done using the R programming language. Data omissions were coded as '1' for missing values and '0' for others. Summary variables were created to indicate the number of personnel and procedure, and data omissions per visit. Results The average completeness of the operating room data was 98%, which is considered excellent. However, seven variables - the start and end date and time of anesthesia, type of treatment, personnel group and assistant information - had completeness below the 95% target level. 34% of the surgical visits contained at least one data omission. In the yearly comparison the completeness values of variables were statistically significantly higher in 2022 compared to 2023. Conclusion By ensuring existing quality assurance practices, verifying internal data maintenance and verifying and standardizing documenting practices the organization can achieve net benefits through improved data completeness, enhancing patient records, financial information and management. Improved data quality will also benefit national and international registries. Keywords: data, patient data, quality, health information system, operating room.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Methods of Information in Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Methods of Information in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2566-7958\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods of Information in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2566-7958","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Completeness of the Operating Room Data.

Background In the operating theatre, a large collection of data is collected at each visit. Some of this data is patient information, some is related to resource management, which is linked to hospital finances. Poor quality data leads to poor decisions, impacting patient safety and the continuity of care. Objectives The study aimed to evaluate the completeness of data documented within surgical operations, and based on the results, the goal is to improve data quality and identify data management improvement ideas. Methods The study was a quantitative evaluation of 33,684 surgical visits, focusing on data omissions. The organization identified 58 operating room data variables related to visits, procedures, resources, and personnel. Data completeness was evaluated for 36 variables, excluding 47 visits with missing 'Complete' flags. Data preprocessing was done using Python and Pandas, with pseudonymization of personnel names. Data analyzing was done using the R programming language. Data omissions were coded as '1' for missing values and '0' for others. Summary variables were created to indicate the number of personnel and procedure, and data omissions per visit. Results The average completeness of the operating room data was 98%, which is considered excellent. However, seven variables - the start and end date and time of anesthesia, type of treatment, personnel group and assistant information - had completeness below the 95% target level. 34% of the surgical visits contained at least one data omission. In the yearly comparison the completeness values of variables were statistically significantly higher in 2022 compared to 2023. Conclusion By ensuring existing quality assurance practices, verifying internal data maintenance and verifying and standardizing documenting practices the organization can achieve net benefits through improved data completeness, enhancing patient records, financial information and management. Improved data quality will also benefit national and international registries. Keywords: data, patient data, quality, health information system, operating room.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Methods of Information in Medicine
Methods of Information in Medicine 医学-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
11.80%
发文量
33
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Good medicine and good healthcare demand good information. Since the journal''s founding in 1962, Methods of Information in Medicine has stressed the methodology and scientific fundamentals of organizing, representing and analyzing data, information and knowledge in biomedicine and health care. Covering publications in the fields of biomedical and health informatics, medical biometry, and epidemiology, the journal publishes original papers, reviews, reports, opinion papers, editorials, and letters to the editor. From time to time, the journal publishes articles on particular focus themes as part of a journal''s issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信