评估酒店的包容性:一个针对老年人和轮椅使用者的通用设计评估的案例研究。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Zahra Vahedi, Taylor Quinn, Lora Cavuoto
{"title":"评估酒店的包容性:一个针对老年人和轮椅使用者的通用设计评估的案例研究。","authors":"Zahra Vahedi, Taylor Quinn, Lora Cavuoto","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2025.2481440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the alignment of Universal Design (UD) principles with hotel features while exploring the experiences and needs of various user groups. UD is crucial in public accommodations, creating environments for all to promote inclusivity and functionality. By examining facilitators and barriers, guest expectations, and potential mismatches in UD implementation, the study provides insight into the effectiveness of UD.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this study, 34 participants (15 young adults, 12 older adults, and 7 wheelchair users) toured a universally designed hotel and participated in a semi-structured interview. The data collected was analyzed to identify the presence of UD features and categorized through thematic latent analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Expectations varied among individuals, revealing fewer universally usable features, especially for wheelchair users. Wheelchair users reported challenges with physical features such as heavy doors, high bed heights, and insufficient maneuvering space. Older adults faced fewer issues but noted difficulties with perceptible information and intuitive navigation. Although supportive design features such as automatic doors and well-placed grab bars were valued, mismatches between user expectations and actual design implementations limited overall usability.<b>Conclusions:</b> The study highlighted the importance of UD in public accommodations and UD evaluation methods that involve end users, offering a holistic evaluation to capture the genuine voice of individuals with disabilities. The findings reveal the need to integrate end-user perspectives into design evaluations to identify barriers and ensure solutions meet diverse user needs. UD should extend beyond accessibility to consider guest-physical interactions, supportive design elements, and aesthetics, creating an improved user experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing hotel inclusivity: a case study evaluation of universal design for older adults and wheelchair users.\",\"authors\":\"Zahra Vahedi, Taylor Quinn, Lora Cavuoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17483107.2025.2481440\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the alignment of Universal Design (UD) principles with hotel features while exploring the experiences and needs of various user groups. UD is crucial in public accommodations, creating environments for all to promote inclusivity and functionality. By examining facilitators and barriers, guest expectations, and potential mismatches in UD implementation, the study provides insight into the effectiveness of UD.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this study, 34 participants (15 young adults, 12 older adults, and 7 wheelchair users) toured a universally designed hotel and participated in a semi-structured interview. The data collected was analyzed to identify the presence of UD features and categorized through thematic latent analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Expectations varied among individuals, revealing fewer universally usable features, especially for wheelchair users. Wheelchair users reported challenges with physical features such as heavy doors, high bed heights, and insufficient maneuvering space. Older adults faced fewer issues but noted difficulties with perceptible information and intuitive navigation. Although supportive design features such as automatic doors and well-placed grab bars were valued, mismatches between user expectations and actual design implementations limited overall usability.<b>Conclusions:</b> The study highlighted the importance of UD in public accommodations and UD evaluation methods that involve end users, offering a holistic evaluation to capture the genuine voice of individuals with disabilities. The findings reveal the need to integrate end-user perspectives into design evaluations to identify barriers and ensure solutions meet diverse user needs. UD should extend beyond accessibility to consider guest-physical interactions, supportive design elements, and aesthetics, creating an improved user experience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2025.2481440\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2025.2481440","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估通用设计(UD)原则与酒店特色的一致性,同时探索不同用户群体的体验和需求。UD在公共设施中至关重要,为所有人创造环境,促进包容性和功能性。通过检查促进因素和障碍、客人期望和潜在的不匹配,本研究深入了解了UD的有效性。材料与方法:在本研究中,34名参与者(15名年轻人,12名老年人和7名轮椅使用者)参观了一家通用设计的酒店,并参加了半结构化访谈。对收集的数据进行分析,以确定UD特征的存在,并通过主题潜在分析进行分类。结果:个体之间的期望不同,揭示了更少的普遍可用的功能,特别是对于轮椅使用者。轮椅使用者报告了一些身体方面的挑战,比如沉重的门、高床高度和活动空间不足。老年人面临的问题较少,但在感知信息和直观导航方面存在困难。尽管支持性设计功能(如自动门和位置良好的抓杆)受到重视,但用户期望与实际设计实现之间的不匹配限制了整体可用性。结论:该研究强调了残障人士在公共设施中的重要性,以及涉及最终用户的残障人士评估方法,提供了一个全面的评估,以捕捉残障人士的真实声音。研究结果表明,需要将最终用户的观点整合到设计评估中,以识别障碍并确保解决方案满足不同用户的需求。UD应该超越可访问性,考虑客户的物理交互、支持性设计元素和美学,创造更好的用户体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing hotel inclusivity: a case study evaluation of universal design for older adults and wheelchair users.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the alignment of Universal Design (UD) principles with hotel features while exploring the experiences and needs of various user groups. UD is crucial in public accommodations, creating environments for all to promote inclusivity and functionality. By examining facilitators and barriers, guest expectations, and potential mismatches in UD implementation, the study provides insight into the effectiveness of UD.

Materials and methods: In this study, 34 participants (15 young adults, 12 older adults, and 7 wheelchair users) toured a universally designed hotel and participated in a semi-structured interview. The data collected was analyzed to identify the presence of UD features and categorized through thematic latent analysis.

Results: Expectations varied among individuals, revealing fewer universally usable features, especially for wheelchair users. Wheelchair users reported challenges with physical features such as heavy doors, high bed heights, and insufficient maneuvering space. Older adults faced fewer issues but noted difficulties with perceptible information and intuitive navigation. Although supportive design features such as automatic doors and well-placed grab bars were valued, mismatches between user expectations and actual design implementations limited overall usability.Conclusions: The study highlighted the importance of UD in public accommodations and UD evaluation methods that involve end users, offering a holistic evaluation to capture the genuine voice of individuals with disabilities. The findings reveal the need to integrate end-user perspectives into design evaluations to identify barriers and ensure solutions meet diverse user needs. UD should extend beyond accessibility to consider guest-physical interactions, supportive design elements, and aesthetics, creating an improved user experience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信