新辅助化疗联合贝伐单抗治疗具有复发危险因素的可切除结直肠癌肝转移:一项多中心现实世界研究。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-03-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17588359251328457
Yizhen Chen, Yuanyuan Zheng, Jia Wu, Rong Ye, Hangdong Jia, Zhenyuan Zhou, Weijie Chen, Linwei Xu, Yuhua Zhang, Ming Zheng
{"title":"新辅助化疗联合贝伐单抗治疗具有复发危险因素的可切除结直肠癌肝转移:一项多中心现实世界研究。","authors":"Yizhen Chen, Yuanyuan Zheng, Jia Wu, Rong Ye, Hangdong Jia, Zhenyuan Zhou, Weijie Chen, Linwei Xu, Yuhua Zhang, Ming Zheng","doi":"10.1177/17588359251328457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, guidelines prohibit the addition of targeted drugs in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for initially resectable colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Nevertheless, efficacy data of NAC combined with bevacizumab (Bev) for initially resectable CRLM with risk factors for recurrence (RFR) are lacking.</p><p><strong>Designs: </strong>We conducted a multicenter real-world cohort study to retrospectively analyze the efficacy and feasibility of NAC combined with Bev for CRLM with RFR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The patients were divided into the NAC alone group and NAC combined with the Bev group. We designated progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS) as the outcomes. Kaplan-Meier, Cox proportional hazards regression models, and subgroup analysis were utilized. RFR was a clinical risk score of 3-5. Subgroup analysis was applied to explore which subgroup was more suitable for NAC combined with Bev.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2015 and 2020, this multicenter real-world study encompassed 335 CRLM patients from six medical centers who underwent curative hepatectomy following NAC. Two hundred seventeen patients were in the NAC alone group, and 118 received NAC combined with Bev. The NAC alone group exhibited an ORR of 51.15%, compared to 66.95% in the NAC combined with Bev (<i>p</i> = 0.005). The R0 resection rates achieved 91.71% for the NAC alone group and 94.92% for the NAC combined with Bev (<i>p</i> = 0.276). Three-year PFS rate was 27.6% for NAC alone and 41.5% for the NAC combined with the Bev group (<i>p</i> = 0.006). Furthermore, the 3-year OS was calculated to be 57.0% for the NAC alone and 66.7% for the NAC combined with Bev patients (<i>p</i> = 0.079).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For initially resectable CRLM patients with RFR, NAC combined with Bev exhibited a higher ORR and longer PFS.</p><p><strong>Chinese clinical trial registry: </strong>ChiCTR2400082966.</p>","PeriodicalId":23053,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","volume":"17 ","pages":"17588359251328457"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948564/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab for resectable colorectal liver metastasis with risk factors for recurrence: a multicenter real-world study.\",\"authors\":\"Yizhen Chen, Yuanyuan Zheng, Jia Wu, Rong Ye, Hangdong Jia, Zhenyuan Zhou, Weijie Chen, Linwei Xu, Yuhua Zhang, Ming Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17588359251328457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, guidelines prohibit the addition of targeted drugs in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for initially resectable colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Nevertheless, efficacy data of NAC combined with bevacizumab (Bev) for initially resectable CRLM with risk factors for recurrence (RFR) are lacking.</p><p><strong>Designs: </strong>We conducted a multicenter real-world cohort study to retrospectively analyze the efficacy and feasibility of NAC combined with Bev for CRLM with RFR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The patients were divided into the NAC alone group and NAC combined with the Bev group. We designated progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS) as the outcomes. Kaplan-Meier, Cox proportional hazards regression models, and subgroup analysis were utilized. RFR was a clinical risk score of 3-5. Subgroup analysis was applied to explore which subgroup was more suitable for NAC combined with Bev.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2015 and 2020, this multicenter real-world study encompassed 335 CRLM patients from six medical centers who underwent curative hepatectomy following NAC. Two hundred seventeen patients were in the NAC alone group, and 118 received NAC combined with Bev. The NAC alone group exhibited an ORR of 51.15%, compared to 66.95% in the NAC combined with Bev (<i>p</i> = 0.005). The R0 resection rates achieved 91.71% for the NAC alone group and 94.92% for the NAC combined with Bev (<i>p</i> = 0.276). Three-year PFS rate was 27.6% for NAC alone and 41.5% for the NAC combined with the Bev group (<i>p</i> = 0.006). Furthermore, the 3-year OS was calculated to be 57.0% for the NAC alone and 66.7% for the NAC combined with Bev patients (<i>p</i> = 0.079).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For initially resectable CRLM patients with RFR, NAC combined with Bev exhibited a higher ORR and longer PFS.</p><p><strong>Chinese clinical trial registry: </strong>ChiCTR2400082966.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"17588359251328457\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948564/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359251328457\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359251328457","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前,指南禁止在初始可切除的结直肠癌肝转移(CRLM)的新辅助化疗(NAC)中添加靶向药物。目的:然而,NAC联合贝伐单抗(bevizumab, Bev)治疗具有复发危险因素(RFR)的初始可切除的CRLM的疗效数据尚缺乏。设计:我们进行了一项多中心真实世界队列研究,回顾性分析NAC联合Bev治疗CRLM合并RFR的疗效和可行性。方法:将患者分为单纯NAC组和NAC联合Bev组。我们指定无进展生存期(PFS)、客观缓解率(ORR)和总生存期(OS)作为结局。采用Kaplan-Meier、Cox比例风险回归模型和亚组分析。RFR临床风险评分为3-5分。采用亚群分析探讨哪一亚群更适合NAC与Bev联合使用。结果:在2015年至2020年期间,这项多中心现实世界研究包括来自六个医疗中心的335名CRLM患者,他们在NAC后接受了根治性肝切除术。单独NAC组117例,NAC联合Bev组118例。NAC单独组的ORR为51.15%,而NAC联合Bev组的ORR为66.95% (p = 0.005)。单纯NAC组R0切除率为91.71%,NAC联合Bev组R0切除率为94.92% (p = 0.276)。NAC单独治疗组3年PFS为27.6%,NAC联合Bev组为41.5% (p = 0.006)。NAC合并Bev患者3年OS为57.0%,NAC合并Bev患者3年OS为66.7% (p = 0.079)。结论:对于最初可切除的伴有RFR的CRLM患者,NAC联合Bev具有更高的ORR和更长的PFS。中国临床试验注册:ChiCTR2400082966。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab for resectable colorectal liver metastasis with risk factors for recurrence: a multicenter real-world study.

Background: Currently, guidelines prohibit the addition of targeted drugs in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for initially resectable colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM).

Objective: Nevertheless, efficacy data of NAC combined with bevacizumab (Bev) for initially resectable CRLM with risk factors for recurrence (RFR) are lacking.

Designs: We conducted a multicenter real-world cohort study to retrospectively analyze the efficacy and feasibility of NAC combined with Bev for CRLM with RFR.

Methods: The patients were divided into the NAC alone group and NAC combined with the Bev group. We designated progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS) as the outcomes. Kaplan-Meier, Cox proportional hazards regression models, and subgroup analysis were utilized. RFR was a clinical risk score of 3-5. Subgroup analysis was applied to explore which subgroup was more suitable for NAC combined with Bev.

Results: Between 2015 and 2020, this multicenter real-world study encompassed 335 CRLM patients from six medical centers who underwent curative hepatectomy following NAC. Two hundred seventeen patients were in the NAC alone group, and 118 received NAC combined with Bev. The NAC alone group exhibited an ORR of 51.15%, compared to 66.95% in the NAC combined with Bev (p = 0.005). The R0 resection rates achieved 91.71% for the NAC alone group and 94.92% for the NAC combined with Bev (p = 0.276). Three-year PFS rate was 27.6% for NAC alone and 41.5% for the NAC combined with the Bev group (p = 0.006). Furthermore, the 3-year OS was calculated to be 57.0% for the NAC alone and 66.7% for the NAC combined with Bev patients (p = 0.079).

Conclusion: For initially resectable CRLM patients with RFR, NAC combined with Bev exhibited a higher ORR and longer PFS.

Chinese clinical trial registry: ChiCTR2400082966.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.00%
发文量
160
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal delivering the highest quality articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of cancer. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in medical oncology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信