规范脑脊液中抗病毒药物暴露的药代动力学方法。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Pharmacotherapy Pub Date : 2025-03-28 DOI:10.1002/phar.70013
Sean N Avedissian, Ying Mu, Caitlyn McCarthy, Ronald J Bosch, Serena Spudich, Rajesh T Gandhi, Deborah K McMahon, Joseph J Eron, John W Mellors, Jiajun Liu, Anthony T Podany, Courtney V Fletcher
{"title":"规范脑脊液中抗病毒药物暴露的药代动力学方法。","authors":"Sean N Avedissian, Ying Mu, Caitlyn McCarthy, Ronald J Bosch, Serena Spudich, Rajesh T Gandhi, Deborah K McMahon, Joseph J Eron, John W Mellors, Jiajun Liu, Anthony T Podany, Courtney V Fletcher","doi":"10.1002/phar.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>HIV has been shown to persist in the central nervous system (CNS) in persons on antiretroviral therapy (ART). Our objective was to use pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling to estimate cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) exposure from time-variant concentrations of various antiretrovirals of ART regimens and to standardize CSF metrics, including maximum concentration [C<sub>MAX</sub>], area under the curve [AUC], and trough [C<sub>Trough</sub>].</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally (ACTG) A5321 is a prospective cohort study of HIV-1 reservoirs in persons with HIV. Plasma and CSF antiretroviral (ARV) concentrations were measured in 74 participants who were receiving ART. PK modeling (Pmetrics) was performed for nine ARVs. Relative CSF penetration for each ARV was estimated by comparing CSF C<sub>MAX</sub> and AUC to plasma C<sub>MAX</sub> and AUC (i.e., C<sub>MAXmethod</sub> and AUC<sub>method</sub>). The CSF C<sub>Trough</sub> for each ARV was compared with in vitro literature values of HIV inhibitory concentration values (IC<sub>50, 90, or 95</sub>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Emtricitabine exhibited the highest median relative CSF penetration (C<sub>MAXmethod</sub>, 46.3%; AUC<sub>method</sub>, 72%) and dolutegravir had the lowest CSF penetration (C<sub>MAXmethod</sub>, 0.57%; AUC<sub>method</sub>, 0.57%). Tenofovir, lamivudine, atazanavir, and raltegravir had median estimated CSF C<sub>Trough</sub> concentrations less than IC<sub>50, 90, or 95</sub>. Interparticipant variability of relative CSF penetration based on exposures ranged from 160% for lamivudine to approximately 9% for dolutegravir.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PK modeling successfully standardized ARV CSF concentrations to a given time point (i.e., C<sub>MAX</sub> or C<sub>Trough</sub>) to allow estimation of CSF penetration. This approach provides uniformity for the assessment of exposure, for the estimation of whether desired therapeutic drug goals are obtained in the CSF, and for further studies to investigate whether CSF exposure metrics calculated using this method are associated with measures of HIV persistence.</p>","PeriodicalId":20013,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacokinetic approaches to standardize antiviral exposure in cerebrospinal fluid.\",\"authors\":\"Sean N Avedissian, Ying Mu, Caitlyn McCarthy, Ronald J Bosch, Serena Spudich, Rajesh T Gandhi, Deborah K McMahon, Joseph J Eron, John W Mellors, Jiajun Liu, Anthony T Podany, Courtney V Fletcher\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/phar.70013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>HIV has been shown to persist in the central nervous system (CNS) in persons on antiretroviral therapy (ART). Our objective was to use pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling to estimate cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) exposure from time-variant concentrations of various antiretrovirals of ART regimens and to standardize CSF metrics, including maximum concentration [C<sub>MAX</sub>], area under the curve [AUC], and trough [C<sub>Trough</sub>].</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally (ACTG) A5321 is a prospective cohort study of HIV-1 reservoirs in persons with HIV. Plasma and CSF antiretroviral (ARV) concentrations were measured in 74 participants who were receiving ART. PK modeling (Pmetrics) was performed for nine ARVs. Relative CSF penetration for each ARV was estimated by comparing CSF C<sub>MAX</sub> and AUC to plasma C<sub>MAX</sub> and AUC (i.e., C<sub>MAXmethod</sub> and AUC<sub>method</sub>). The CSF C<sub>Trough</sub> for each ARV was compared with in vitro literature values of HIV inhibitory concentration values (IC<sub>50, 90, or 95</sub>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Emtricitabine exhibited the highest median relative CSF penetration (C<sub>MAXmethod</sub>, 46.3%; AUC<sub>method</sub>, 72%) and dolutegravir had the lowest CSF penetration (C<sub>MAXmethod</sub>, 0.57%; AUC<sub>method</sub>, 0.57%). Tenofovir, lamivudine, atazanavir, and raltegravir had median estimated CSF C<sub>Trough</sub> concentrations less than IC<sub>50, 90, or 95</sub>. Interparticipant variability of relative CSF penetration based on exposures ranged from 160% for lamivudine to approximately 9% for dolutegravir.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PK modeling successfully standardized ARV CSF concentrations to a given time point (i.e., C<sub>MAX</sub> or C<sub>Trough</sub>) to allow estimation of CSF penetration. This approach provides uniformity for the assessment of exposure, for the estimation of whether desired therapeutic drug goals are obtained in the CSF, and for further studies to investigate whether CSF exposure metrics calculated using this method are associated with measures of HIV persistence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.70013\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.70013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:艾滋病毒已被证明在接受抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)的人的中枢神经系统(CNS)中持续存在。我们的目的是使用药代动力学(PK)模型来估计抗逆转录病毒治疗方案中各种抗逆转录病毒药物随时间变化的浓度对脑脊液(CSF)的影响,并对CSF指标进行标准化,包括最大浓度[CMAX]、曲线下面积[AUC]和波谷[CTrough]。方法:全球推进临床治疗(ACTG) A5321是HIV感染者HIV-1储存库的前瞻性队列研究。在74名接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的参与者中测量了血浆和脑脊液抗逆转录病毒(ARV)浓度。对9种抗逆转录病毒药物进行PK建模(Pmetrics)。通过比较脑脊液CMAX和AUC与血浆CMAX和AUC(即CMAXmethod和AUCmethod)来估计每种ARV的相对脑脊液穿透性。将每种ARV的CSF穿过率与体外HIV抑制浓度的文献值(IC50、90或95)进行比较。结果:恩曲他滨表现出最高的中位相对脑脊液穿透率(CMAXmethod, 46.3%;AUCmethod, 72%)和dolutegravir的CSF穿透率最低(CMAXmethod, 0.57%;AUCmethod, 0.57%)。替诺福韦、拉米夫定、阿扎那韦和雷替格拉韦的中位估计CSF通过浓度小于IC50、90和95。基于暴露的参与者间相对脑脊液穿透的变异性从拉米夫定的160%到多替克韦的约9%不等。结论:PK模型成功地将ARV脑脊液浓度标准化到给定时间点(即CMAX或CTrough),从而可以估计脑脊液的穿透程度。该方法为暴露评估提供了一致性,用于估计是否在CSF中获得所需的治疗药物目标,并为进一步研究使用该方法计算的CSF暴露度量是否与HIV持久性测量相关提供了一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pharmacokinetic approaches to standardize antiviral exposure in cerebrospinal fluid.

Objectives: HIV has been shown to persist in the central nervous system (CNS) in persons on antiretroviral therapy (ART). Our objective was to use pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling to estimate cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) exposure from time-variant concentrations of various antiretrovirals of ART regimens and to standardize CSF metrics, including maximum concentration [CMAX], area under the curve [AUC], and trough [CTrough].

Methods: Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally (ACTG) A5321 is a prospective cohort study of HIV-1 reservoirs in persons with HIV. Plasma and CSF antiretroviral (ARV) concentrations were measured in 74 participants who were receiving ART. PK modeling (Pmetrics) was performed for nine ARVs. Relative CSF penetration for each ARV was estimated by comparing CSF CMAX and AUC to plasma CMAX and AUC (i.e., CMAXmethod and AUCmethod). The CSF CTrough for each ARV was compared with in vitro literature values of HIV inhibitory concentration values (IC50, 90, or 95).

Results: Emtricitabine exhibited the highest median relative CSF penetration (CMAXmethod, 46.3%; AUCmethod, 72%) and dolutegravir had the lowest CSF penetration (CMAXmethod, 0.57%; AUCmethod, 0.57%). Tenofovir, lamivudine, atazanavir, and raltegravir had median estimated CSF CTrough concentrations less than IC50, 90, or 95. Interparticipant variability of relative CSF penetration based on exposures ranged from 160% for lamivudine to approximately 9% for dolutegravir.

Conclusions: PK modeling successfully standardized ARV CSF concentrations to a given time point (i.e., CMAX or CTrough) to allow estimation of CSF penetration. This approach provides uniformity for the assessment of exposure, for the estimation of whether desired therapeutic drug goals are obtained in the CSF, and for further studies to investigate whether CSF exposure metrics calculated using this method are associated with measures of HIV persistence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacotherapy
Pharmacotherapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.40%
发文量
93
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmacotherapy is devoted to publication of original research articles on all aspects of human pharmacology and review articles on drugs and drug therapy. The Editors and Editorial Board invite original research reports on pharmacokinetic, bioavailability, and drug interaction studies, clinical trials, investigations of specific pharmacological properties of drugs, and related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信