基于组的轨迹建模,以确定老年人联合三联治疗(口服降糖药、肾素-血管紧张素系统拮抗剂、他汀类药物)的纵向模式和依从性预测因素。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Sai S Cheruvu, Bilqees Fatima, Susan Abughosh
{"title":"基于组的轨迹建模,以确定老年人联合三联治疗(口服降糖药、肾素-血管紧张素系统拮抗剂、他汀类药物)的纵向模式和依从性预测因素。","authors":"Sai S Cheruvu, Bilqees Fatima, Susan Abughosh","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.4.396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia frequently co-occur in older adults, significantly increasing their risk for cardiovascular disease, a leading cause of mortality in the United States. Managing these conditions often requires concomitant triple therapy, which includes antihypertensives, oral antidiabetics, and statins. Although medication adherence is critical for reducing cardiovascular risk, adherence to complex regimens is often suboptimal in older populations, further complicating disease management. Medicare's STAR metrics assess adherence to these medications as a measure of care quality. Traditional methods, like the proportion of days covered (PDC), provide single adherence estimates, but fail to capture the dynamic nature of adherence over time. Group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) offers a more comprehensive approach, graphically depicting patterns of adherence behavior. This study seeks to understand longitudinal patterns and predictors of adherence of concurrent triple therapy among elderly patients under Managed Care using GBTM.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate adherence patterns to concurrent triple therapy (antidiabetic, antihypertensive, and lipid-lowering medications) among older patients using GBTM and identify predictors associated with each adherence trajectory.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients on concurrent triple therapy were identified using a Texas Medicare Advantage dataset from July 2016 to December 2016. Patients included had an overlap of 30 days of triple therapy, a second prescription of each component of triple therapy within the identification period, and a 12-month follow-up after the triple therapy. Monthly adherence was measured using PDC during follow-up. Patients were defined as adherent if they had at least 80% (24 out of the 30 days) covered for all 3 medications. The monthly PDC was incorporated into a logistic GBTM to provide distinct patterns of adherence. Two to five adherence groups were estimated using the second-order polynomial function of time. Predictors of adherence were identified using multinomial logistic regression, guided by the Anderson Behavioral Model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 7,847 patients included, the following 4 distinct adherence trajectories were identified: adherent (42.5%), gaps in adherence (28.9%), gradual decline (13.4%), and rapid decline (15.3%). Female patients had higher odds of being in the gaps in adherence or rapid decline groups compared with males. Low-income subsidy recipients were less likely to experience rapid decline. Prior hospitalizations increased the likelihood of rapid decline in adherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified heterogeneous adherence patterns among older adults on triple therapy for cardiovascular disease risk factors. Targeted interventions tailored to specific adherence trajectories are needed to improve medication adherence and health outcomes in this high-risk population.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"31 4","pages":"396-405"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11953873/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Group-based trajectory modeling to identify longitudinal patterns and predictors of adherence among older adults on concomitant triple therapy (oral antidiabetic, renin-angiotensin-system antagonists, statins).\",\"authors\":\"Sai S Cheruvu, Bilqees Fatima, Susan Abughosh\",\"doi\":\"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.4.396\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia frequently co-occur in older adults, significantly increasing their risk for cardiovascular disease, a leading cause of mortality in the United States. Managing these conditions often requires concomitant triple therapy, which includes antihypertensives, oral antidiabetics, and statins. Although medication adherence is critical for reducing cardiovascular risk, adherence to complex regimens is often suboptimal in older populations, further complicating disease management. Medicare's STAR metrics assess adherence to these medications as a measure of care quality. Traditional methods, like the proportion of days covered (PDC), provide single adherence estimates, but fail to capture the dynamic nature of adherence over time. Group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) offers a more comprehensive approach, graphically depicting patterns of adherence behavior. This study seeks to understand longitudinal patterns and predictors of adherence of concurrent triple therapy among elderly patients under Managed Care using GBTM.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate adherence patterns to concurrent triple therapy (antidiabetic, antihypertensive, and lipid-lowering medications) among older patients using GBTM and identify predictors associated with each adherence trajectory.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients on concurrent triple therapy were identified using a Texas Medicare Advantage dataset from July 2016 to December 2016. Patients included had an overlap of 30 days of triple therapy, a second prescription of each component of triple therapy within the identification period, and a 12-month follow-up after the triple therapy. Monthly adherence was measured using PDC during follow-up. Patients were defined as adherent if they had at least 80% (24 out of the 30 days) covered for all 3 medications. The monthly PDC was incorporated into a logistic GBTM to provide distinct patterns of adherence. Two to five adherence groups were estimated using the second-order polynomial function of time. Predictors of adherence were identified using multinomial logistic regression, guided by the Anderson Behavioral Model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 7,847 patients included, the following 4 distinct adherence trajectories were identified: adherent (42.5%), gaps in adherence (28.9%), gradual decline (13.4%), and rapid decline (15.3%). Female patients had higher odds of being in the gaps in adherence or rapid decline groups compared with males. Low-income subsidy recipients were less likely to experience rapid decline. Prior hospitalizations increased the likelihood of rapid decline in adherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified heterogeneous adherence patterns among older adults on triple therapy for cardiovascular disease risk factors. Targeted interventions tailored to specific adherence trajectories are needed to improve medication adherence and health outcomes in this high-risk population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"31 4\",\"pages\":\"396-405\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11953873/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.4.396\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.4.396","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:糖尿病、高血压和高脂血症经常在老年人中同时发生,显著增加了他们患心血管疾病的风险,心血管疾病是美国死亡的主要原因。治疗这些疾病通常需要三联治疗,包括抗高血压药、口服降糖药和他汀类药物。尽管药物依从性对于降低心血管风险至关重要,但在老年人群中,坚持复杂的方案往往不是最佳方案,这进一步使疾病管理复杂化。医疗保健STAR指标评估这些药物的依从性,作为护理质量的衡量标准。传统的方法,如覆盖天数比例(PDC),提供了单一的依从性估计,但无法捕捉随时间变化的依从性的动态特性。基于群体的轨迹建模(GBTM)提供了更全面的方法,图形化地描绘了依从性行为的模式。本研究旨在了解采用GBTM管理护理的老年患者同时三联治疗依从性的纵向模式和预测因素。目的:评估使用GBTM的老年患者对同时进行三联治疗(降糖、降压和降脂药物)的依从性模式,并确定每种依从性轨迹的相关预测因素。方法:使用2016年7月至2016年12月的德克萨斯州医疗保险优势数据集确定同时接受三联疗法的患者。纳入的患者重叠30天的三联治疗,在鉴定期内对三联治疗的每个组成部分进行第二次处方,并在三联治疗后进行12个月的随访。随访期间使用PDC测量每月依从性。如果患者至少80%(30天中的24天)覆盖了所有3种药物,则定义为坚持治疗。每月PDC合并到逻辑GBTM中,以提供不同的依从性模式。使用时间的二阶多项式函数估计2至5个依从性组。在安德森行为模型的指导下,使用多项逻辑回归确定依从性的预测因子。结果:在7847例患者中,确定了以下4种不同的依从性轨迹:坚持(42.5%),依从性差距(28.9%),逐渐下降(13.4%)和快速下降(15.3%)。与男性相比,女性患者在依从性或快速下降组中处于空白状态的几率更高。低收入补贴接受者不太可能经历迅速下降。先前的住院经历增加了依从性迅速下降的可能性。结论:本研究确定了老年人心血管疾病危险因素三联疗法的异质依从性模式。需要针对特定依从性轨迹进行针对性干预,以改善这一高危人群的药物依从性和健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Group-based trajectory modeling to identify longitudinal patterns and predictors of adherence among older adults on concomitant triple therapy (oral antidiabetic, renin-angiotensin-system antagonists, statins).

Background: Diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia frequently co-occur in older adults, significantly increasing their risk for cardiovascular disease, a leading cause of mortality in the United States. Managing these conditions often requires concomitant triple therapy, which includes antihypertensives, oral antidiabetics, and statins. Although medication adherence is critical for reducing cardiovascular risk, adherence to complex regimens is often suboptimal in older populations, further complicating disease management. Medicare's STAR metrics assess adherence to these medications as a measure of care quality. Traditional methods, like the proportion of days covered (PDC), provide single adherence estimates, but fail to capture the dynamic nature of adherence over time. Group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) offers a more comprehensive approach, graphically depicting patterns of adherence behavior. This study seeks to understand longitudinal patterns and predictors of adherence of concurrent triple therapy among elderly patients under Managed Care using GBTM.

Objective: To evaluate adherence patterns to concurrent triple therapy (antidiabetic, antihypertensive, and lipid-lowering medications) among older patients using GBTM and identify predictors associated with each adherence trajectory.

Methods: Patients on concurrent triple therapy were identified using a Texas Medicare Advantage dataset from July 2016 to December 2016. Patients included had an overlap of 30 days of triple therapy, a second prescription of each component of triple therapy within the identification period, and a 12-month follow-up after the triple therapy. Monthly adherence was measured using PDC during follow-up. Patients were defined as adherent if they had at least 80% (24 out of the 30 days) covered for all 3 medications. The monthly PDC was incorporated into a logistic GBTM to provide distinct patterns of adherence. Two to five adherence groups were estimated using the second-order polynomial function of time. Predictors of adherence were identified using multinomial logistic regression, guided by the Anderson Behavioral Model.

Results: Of the 7,847 patients included, the following 4 distinct adherence trajectories were identified: adherent (42.5%), gaps in adherence (28.9%), gradual decline (13.4%), and rapid decline (15.3%). Female patients had higher odds of being in the gaps in adherence or rapid decline groups compared with males. Low-income subsidy recipients were less likely to experience rapid decline. Prior hospitalizations increased the likelihood of rapid decline in adherence.

Conclusions: This study identified heterogeneous adherence patterns among older adults on triple therapy for cardiovascular disease risk factors. Targeted interventions tailored to specific adherence trajectories are needed to improve medication adherence and health outcomes in this high-risk population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: JMCP welcomes research studies conducted outside of the United States that are relevant to our readership. Our audience is primarily concerned with designing policies of formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs that are based on evidence from large populations of people. Studies of pharmacist interventions conducted outside the United States that have already been extensively studied within the United States and studies of small sample sizes in non-managed care environments outside of the United States (e.g., hospitals or community pharmacies) are generally of low interest to our readership. However, studies of health outcomes and costs assessed in large populations that provide evidence for formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs are of high interest to JMCP’s readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信