2021年至2023年通过“瘦身标签”批准的首个仿制药的频率。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Therese J Ziaks, Chukwubuikem M Akanegbu, Alexander C Egilman, Aaron S Kesselheim
{"title":"2021年至2023年通过“瘦身标签”批准的首个仿制药的频率。","authors":"Therese J Ziaks, Chukwubuikem M Akanegbu, Alexander C Egilman, Aaron S Kesselheim","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.4.343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brand-name drug manufacturers receive a market exclusivity period following US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval, which can be extended through obtaining additional patents such as method-of-use patents. The skinny labeling pathway, in which the FDA approves generic prescriptions that carve out patent-protected indications from their labeling, has helped promote competition and timely market entry of low-cost generic prescriptions for many decades.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine how the use of the skinny labeling pathway by generic prescription drug manufacturers has changed in recent years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on FDA-curated lists, we assessed the proportion of FDA-approved first generic prescriptions using the skinny labeling pathway from 2021 to 2023. We also examined whether the use of the pathway changed after a 2021 federal court decision (<i>GlaxoSmithKline v. Teva</i>) increased the risk of legal liability for generic manufacturers marketing skinny label generic prescriptions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2021 to 2023, 42.9% of 21 susceptible brand-name drugs required a skinny labeled generic prescription, including 5 (56%) in 2021, 3 (43%) in 2022, and 1 (20%) in 2023.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Previous literature found 43% of brand-name drugs experienced skinny labeling generic prescription competition in a 2015-2019 sample, which is consistent with the rate of skinny labeled generic prescription entry early in our sample. Then, the proportion of first generic prescriptions approved with a skinny label decreased annually from 2021 to 2023. Applying this 2021 <i>GlaxoSmithKline v. Teva</i> methodology in subsequent years can help determine whether the judicial decision has had a sustained chilling effect on generic prescription manufacturers' use of skinny labeling, resulting in delayed generic prescription competition as a result of fewer generic prescriptions entering the market.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"31 4","pages":"343-350"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11953849/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frequency of first generic drugs approved through \\\"skinny labeling,\\\" 2021 to 2023.\",\"authors\":\"Therese J Ziaks, Chukwubuikem M Akanegbu, Alexander C Egilman, Aaron S Kesselheim\",\"doi\":\"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.4.343\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brand-name drug manufacturers receive a market exclusivity period following US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval, which can be extended through obtaining additional patents such as method-of-use patents. The skinny labeling pathway, in which the FDA approves generic prescriptions that carve out patent-protected indications from their labeling, has helped promote competition and timely market entry of low-cost generic prescriptions for many decades.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine how the use of the skinny labeling pathway by generic prescription drug manufacturers has changed in recent years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on FDA-curated lists, we assessed the proportion of FDA-approved first generic prescriptions using the skinny labeling pathway from 2021 to 2023. We also examined whether the use of the pathway changed after a 2021 federal court decision (<i>GlaxoSmithKline v. Teva</i>) increased the risk of legal liability for generic manufacturers marketing skinny label generic prescriptions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2021 to 2023, 42.9% of 21 susceptible brand-name drugs required a skinny labeled generic prescription, including 5 (56%) in 2021, 3 (43%) in 2022, and 1 (20%) in 2023.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Previous literature found 43% of brand-name drugs experienced skinny labeling generic prescription competition in a 2015-2019 sample, which is consistent with the rate of skinny labeled generic prescription entry early in our sample. Then, the proportion of first generic prescriptions approved with a skinny label decreased annually from 2021 to 2023. Applying this 2021 <i>GlaxoSmithKline v. Teva</i> methodology in subsequent years can help determine whether the judicial decision has had a sustained chilling effect on generic prescription manufacturers' use of skinny labeling, resulting in delayed generic prescription competition as a result of fewer generic prescriptions entering the market.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"31 4\",\"pages\":\"343-350\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11953849/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.4.343\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.4.343","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:品牌药品制造商在获得美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准后获得市场独占期,可以通过获得额外的专利(如使用方法专利)来延长。几十年来,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准仿制药处方,并在其标签上划出受专利保护的适应症,这一“瘦身标签”途径有助于促进竞争,并使低成本仿制药处方及时进入市场。目的:了解近年来非专利处方药生产企业使用瘦标途径的变化情况。方法:基于fda整理的清单,我们评估了2021年至2023年fda批准的使用瘦标签途径的首个仿制药处方的比例。我们还研究了2021年联邦法院判决(葛兰素史克诉梯瓦案)增加仿制药制造商销售瘦标签仿制药的法律责任风险后,该途径的使用是否发生了变化。结果:2021 - 2023年,21种敏感药中有42.9%需要瘦标仿制药处方,其中2021年为5种(56%),2022年为3种(43%),2023年为1种(20%)。结论:既往文献发现,在2015-2019年样本中,43%的品牌药经历了瘦标仿制药处方竞争,这与我们样本早期瘦标仿制药处方进入率一致。然后,从2021年到2023年,首次批准带有瘦身标签的仿制药比例每年都在下降。在随后的几年中应用2021年葛兰素史克诉梯瓦案的方法可以帮助确定司法决定是否对仿制药处方制造商使用窄标签产生持续的寒心效应,从而由于进入市场的仿制药处方减少而导致仿制药处方竞争延迟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Frequency of first generic drugs approved through "skinny labeling," 2021 to 2023.

Background: Brand-name drug manufacturers receive a market exclusivity period following US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval, which can be extended through obtaining additional patents such as method-of-use patents. The skinny labeling pathway, in which the FDA approves generic prescriptions that carve out patent-protected indications from their labeling, has helped promote competition and timely market entry of low-cost generic prescriptions for many decades.

Objective: To determine how the use of the skinny labeling pathway by generic prescription drug manufacturers has changed in recent years.

Methods: Based on FDA-curated lists, we assessed the proportion of FDA-approved first generic prescriptions using the skinny labeling pathway from 2021 to 2023. We also examined whether the use of the pathway changed after a 2021 federal court decision (GlaxoSmithKline v. Teva) increased the risk of legal liability for generic manufacturers marketing skinny label generic prescriptions.

Results: From 2021 to 2023, 42.9% of 21 susceptible brand-name drugs required a skinny labeled generic prescription, including 5 (56%) in 2021, 3 (43%) in 2022, and 1 (20%) in 2023.

Conclusions: Previous literature found 43% of brand-name drugs experienced skinny labeling generic prescription competition in a 2015-2019 sample, which is consistent with the rate of skinny labeled generic prescription entry early in our sample. Then, the proportion of first generic prescriptions approved with a skinny label decreased annually from 2021 to 2023. Applying this 2021 GlaxoSmithKline v. Teva methodology in subsequent years can help determine whether the judicial decision has had a sustained chilling effect on generic prescription manufacturers' use of skinny labeling, resulting in delayed generic prescription competition as a result of fewer generic prescriptions entering the market.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: JMCP welcomes research studies conducted outside of the United States that are relevant to our readership. Our audience is primarily concerned with designing policies of formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs that are based on evidence from large populations of people. Studies of pharmacist interventions conducted outside the United States that have already been extensively studied within the United States and studies of small sample sizes in non-managed care environments outside of the United States (e.g., hospitals or community pharmacies) are generally of low interest to our readership. However, studies of health outcomes and costs assessed in large populations that provide evidence for formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs are of high interest to JMCP’s readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信