基于自我学习的知情决策工具对慢性心力衰竭患者治疗依从性的赋权-一项试点研究。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Lea Iten, Kevin Selby, Celine Glauser, Sara Schukraft, Roger Hullin
{"title":"基于自我学习的知情决策工具对慢性心力衰竭患者治疗依从性的赋权-一项试点研究。","authors":"Lea Iten, Kevin Selby, Celine Glauser, Sara Schukraft, Roger Hullin","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13060685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Adherence to drug prescriptions is often suboptimal among heart failure (HF) patients. Informed decision-making may improve patients' adherence to HF drug prescriptions. <b>Aims of the study:</b> We aimed to test whether a self-study-based informed decision-making tool could improve adherence to drug prescriptions among ambulatory HF patients. <b>Methods:</b> A tool and a statement-based questionnaire were developed to evaluate drug adherence willingness based on COMPAR-EU recommendations. The test group (<i>n</i> = 40) was exposed to the tool + questionnaire; controls (<i>n</i> = 40) answered the questionnaire only. Agreement with statements of the questionnaire was graded on a scale of 0 to 4 points, reflecting no to full agreement. <b>Results:</b> The median age of controls was younger (56 vs. 61 years; <i>p</i> = 0.04); test and control group patients did not differ across other parameters (always <i>p</i> > 0.05). Patients in both groups agreed that \"HF is a life-long disease\" (3.5 vs. 4; <i>p</i> = 0.19) and that \"only life-long drug treatment provides benefit\" (4 vs. 4; <i>p</i> = 0.22). More test group patients confirmed improved comprehension of HF disease (3 vs. 2; <i>p</i> = 0.03) and greater acceptance that \"achievement of benefit asks for a combination of HF drugs\" (4 vs. 3; <i>p</i> = 0.009) and \"daily intake\" (4 vs. 3; <i>p</i> = 0.004). In test group patients, questions remained, resulting in less agreement that \"all aspects of my heart disease\" are understood (1 vs. 3; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Willingness to adhere to HF-drug treatment was not different between the groups (3 vs. 3.5; <i>p</i> = 0.28). <b>Conclusions:</b> The self-study-based informed decision-making tool improved the comprehension of HF and the need for HF treatment, but did not improve willingness to adhere since questions remained unanswered.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11942012/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-Study-Based Informed Decision-Making Tool for Empowerment of Treatment Adherence Among Chronic Heart Failure Patients-A Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Lea Iten, Kevin Selby, Celine Glauser, Sara Schukraft, Roger Hullin\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/healthcare13060685\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Adherence to drug prescriptions is often suboptimal among heart failure (HF) patients. Informed decision-making may improve patients' adherence to HF drug prescriptions. <b>Aims of the study:</b> We aimed to test whether a self-study-based informed decision-making tool could improve adherence to drug prescriptions among ambulatory HF patients. <b>Methods:</b> A tool and a statement-based questionnaire were developed to evaluate drug adherence willingness based on COMPAR-EU recommendations. The test group (<i>n</i> = 40) was exposed to the tool + questionnaire; controls (<i>n</i> = 40) answered the questionnaire only. Agreement with statements of the questionnaire was graded on a scale of 0 to 4 points, reflecting no to full agreement. <b>Results:</b> The median age of controls was younger (56 vs. 61 years; <i>p</i> = 0.04); test and control group patients did not differ across other parameters (always <i>p</i> > 0.05). Patients in both groups agreed that \\\"HF is a life-long disease\\\" (3.5 vs. 4; <i>p</i> = 0.19) and that \\\"only life-long drug treatment provides benefit\\\" (4 vs. 4; <i>p</i> = 0.22). More test group patients confirmed improved comprehension of HF disease (3 vs. 2; <i>p</i> = 0.03) and greater acceptance that \\\"achievement of benefit asks for a combination of HF drugs\\\" (4 vs. 3; <i>p</i> = 0.009) and \\\"daily intake\\\" (4 vs. 3; <i>p</i> = 0.004). In test group patients, questions remained, resulting in less agreement that \\\"all aspects of my heart disease\\\" are understood (1 vs. 3; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Willingness to adhere to HF-drug treatment was not different between the groups (3 vs. 3.5; <i>p</i> = 0.28). <b>Conclusions:</b> The self-study-based informed decision-making tool improved the comprehension of HF and the need for HF treatment, but did not improve willingness to adhere since questions remained unanswered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare\",\"volume\":\"13 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11942012/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13060685\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13060685","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在心力衰竭(HF)患者中,药物处方的依从性通常不是最佳的。知情决策可以提高患者对心衰药物处方的依从性。研究目的:我们旨在测试基于自我学习的知情决策工具是否可以提高门诊心衰患者对药物处方的依从性。方法:采用一种工具和一份基于陈述的问卷来评估基于comp - eu建议的药物依从性意愿。试验组(n = 40)采用工具+问卷;对照组(n = 40)仅回答问卷。对问卷陈述的同意程度按0到4分进行评分,反映不同意到完全同意。结果:对照组的中位年龄更年轻(56岁vs. 61岁;P = 0.04);试验组和对照组患者在其他参数上无差异(p < 0.05)。两组患者一致认为“心衰是一种终生疾病”(3.5 vs. 4;P = 0.19)和“只有终身药物治疗才有益处”(4 vs. 4;P = 0.22)。更多试验组患者证实对心衰疾病的理解有所提高(3 vs. 2;p = 0.03),并且更容易接受“实现获益需要联合使用HF药物”(4 vs. 3;P = 0.009)和“每日摄入量”(4 vs. 3;P = 0.004)。在试验组患者中,问题仍然存在,导致对“我心脏病的所有方面”的理解不太一致(1 vs. 3;P < 0.001)。坚持hf药物治疗的意愿在两组之间没有差异(3比3.5;P = 0.28)。结论:基于自学的知情决策工具提高了对心衰的理解和对心衰治疗的需求,但没有提高坚持的意愿,因为问题仍未得到解答。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Self-Study-Based Informed Decision-Making Tool for Empowerment of Treatment Adherence Among Chronic Heart Failure Patients-A Pilot Study.

Background: Adherence to drug prescriptions is often suboptimal among heart failure (HF) patients. Informed decision-making may improve patients' adherence to HF drug prescriptions. Aims of the study: We aimed to test whether a self-study-based informed decision-making tool could improve adherence to drug prescriptions among ambulatory HF patients. Methods: A tool and a statement-based questionnaire were developed to evaluate drug adherence willingness based on COMPAR-EU recommendations. The test group (n = 40) was exposed to the tool + questionnaire; controls (n = 40) answered the questionnaire only. Agreement with statements of the questionnaire was graded on a scale of 0 to 4 points, reflecting no to full agreement. Results: The median age of controls was younger (56 vs. 61 years; p = 0.04); test and control group patients did not differ across other parameters (always p > 0.05). Patients in both groups agreed that "HF is a life-long disease" (3.5 vs. 4; p = 0.19) and that "only life-long drug treatment provides benefit" (4 vs. 4; p = 0.22). More test group patients confirmed improved comprehension of HF disease (3 vs. 2; p = 0.03) and greater acceptance that "achievement of benefit asks for a combination of HF drugs" (4 vs. 3; p = 0.009) and "daily intake" (4 vs. 3; p = 0.004). In test group patients, questions remained, resulting in less agreement that "all aspects of my heart disease" are understood (1 vs. 3; p < 0.001). Willingness to adhere to HF-drug treatment was not different between the groups (3 vs. 3.5; p = 0.28). Conclusions: The self-study-based informed decision-making tool improved the comprehension of HF and the need for HF treatment, but did not improve willingness to adhere since questions remained unanswered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信