Mark J. Giganti , Kara W. Chew , Carlee Moser , Joseph J. Eron , Mauricio Pinilla , Jonathan Z. Li , Justin Ritz , Arzhang Cyrus Javan , David Alain Wohl , Eric S. Daar , Judith S. Currier , Davey M. Smith , Michael D. Hughes , the ACTIV-2/A5401 Study Team
{"title":"Implementation of a seamless phase 2/3 study design in the setting of an emergent infectious disease pandemic: Lessons learned from the ACTIV-2 platform COVID-19 treatment trial","authors":"Mark J. Giganti , Kara W. Chew , Carlee Moser , Joseph J. Eron , Mauricio Pinilla , Jonathan Z. Li , Justin Ritz , Arzhang Cyrus Javan , David Alain Wohl , Eric S. Daar , Judith S. Currier , Davey M. Smith , Michael D. Hughes , the ACTIV-2/A5401 Study Team","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2025.107887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Seamless phase 2/3 study designs provide a framework for a more efficient trial. During the COVID-19 pandemic, such study designs were considered particularly appealing as there was an urgent global need to rapidly identify effective therapeutics. However, limited in vivo safety and efficacy data was available early in the pandemic to inform decisions. As part of the ACTIV-2 study, we implemented a phase 2/3 platform trial to evaluate multiple candidate treatments for non-hospitalized adults with COVID-19. In addition to an adequate safety profile, the decision to graduate an agent from phase 2 to phase 3 was based on showing treatment effects on clinical or laboratory markers. Decision criteria evolved over time as more data became available during the global pandemic. A seamless transition and approximately 20 % reduction in total sample size was achieved for one agent, amubarvimab plus romlusevimab. Using both simulation studies and actual results from graduation assessments of five ACTIV-2 candidate therapeutics, we provide a discussion of lessons learned from our implementation and recommendations for future seamless trials of interventions for emergent infections.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"153 ","pages":"Article 107887"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714425000813","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Implementation of a seamless phase 2/3 study design in the setting of an emergent infectious disease pandemic: Lessons learned from the ACTIV-2 platform COVID-19 treatment trial
Seamless phase 2/3 study designs provide a framework for a more efficient trial. During the COVID-19 pandemic, such study designs were considered particularly appealing as there was an urgent global need to rapidly identify effective therapeutics. However, limited in vivo safety and efficacy data was available early in the pandemic to inform decisions. As part of the ACTIV-2 study, we implemented a phase 2/3 platform trial to evaluate multiple candidate treatments for non-hospitalized adults with COVID-19. In addition to an adequate safety profile, the decision to graduate an agent from phase 2 to phase 3 was based on showing treatment effects on clinical or laboratory markers. Decision criteria evolved over time as more data became available during the global pandemic. A seamless transition and approximately 20 % reduction in total sample size was achieved for one agent, amubarvimab plus romlusevimab. Using both simulation studies and actual results from graduation assessments of five ACTIV-2 candidate therapeutics, we provide a discussion of lessons learned from our implementation and recommendations for future seamless trials of interventions for emergent infections.
期刊介绍:
Contemporary Clinical Trials is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes manuscripts pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from disciplines including medicine, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioural science, pharmaceutical science, and bioethics. Full-length papers and short communications not exceeding 1,500 words, as well as systemic reviews of clinical trials and methodologies will be published. Perspectives/commentaries on current issues and the impact of clinical trials on the practice of medicine and health policy are also welcome.