IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Aina Enckell, Hanna-Maria Roitto, Hannu Kautiainen, Mika T Lehto, Kaisu H Pitkälä, Timo Kauppila, Merja K Laine
{"title":"Change of primary health care service provider model in Vantaa: the impact on mortality and causes of death among older adults - a register-based follow-up study.","authors":"Aina Enckell, Hanna-Maria Roitto, Hannu Kautiainen, Mika T Lehto, Kaisu H Pitkälä, Timo Kauppila, Merja K Laine","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-12595-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Access to primary health care (PHC) has declined in Finland in recent years. To address this, the city of Vantaa, Finland, transitioned from a named general practitioner (GP) model to a restricted-list GP model in 2011 to increase access to named GPs for the most vulnerable population. This study evaluates the impact of this model change on mortality rates and causes of death among older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This register-based follow-up study was conducted in Vantaa, Finland, using data from the electronic health records. The study included all patient contacts aged 75 and older between 1 September 2004 and 31 August 2018. The primary outcome was the Standardised Mortality Ratio (SMR). We calculated excess deaths and examined cause-specific mortality trends before and after the restricted-list GP model implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 32,034 PHC contacts were recorded. The SMR remained stable during the named GP model years but began to decrease during the restricted-list GP model, falling below expected levels from 2016 onward. Excess deaths decreased from 615 in 2004 in the named GP model to -29 by 2018, when the restricted-list GP model was in operation. Leading causes of death were circulatory diseases (41.1%), cancers (20.4%) and neurological conditions (17.8%), with a decrease in circulatory disease deaths and an increase in cancer and dementia-related deaths over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The transition to the restricted-list GP model was associated with a lower SMR and fewer excess deaths in older adults. These findings highlight the importance of ongoing assessment of PHC models to ensure they meet evolving healthcare demands.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"458"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11951805/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12595-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:近年来,芬兰初级卫生保健(PHC)的普及率有所下降。为解决这一问题,芬兰万塔市于2011年从全科医生模式过渡到全科医生限制名单模式,以增加最弱势人群获得全科医生服务的机会。本研究评估了这一模式转变对老年人死亡率和死亡原因的影响:这项基于登记册的跟踪研究在芬兰万塔进行,使用的数据来自电子健康记录。研究对象包括 2004 年 9 月 1 日至 2018 年 8 月 31 日期间所有 75 岁及以上的患者联系人。主要结果是标准化死亡率(SMR)。我们计算了超额死亡人数,并研究了限制性全科医生列表模型实施前后的特定病因死亡率趋势:在研究期间,共记录了 32,034 次初级保健接触。在全科医生模式命名年期间,SMR 保持稳定,但在限制性全科医生模式期间开始下降,从 2016 年起降至预期水平以下。在全科医生命名模式下,超额死亡人数从2004年的615人减少到2018年的-29人,当时限制名单全科医生模式正在运行。主要死因是循环系统疾病(41.1%)、癌症(20.4%)和神经系统疾病(17.8%),随着时间的推移,循环系统疾病死亡人数减少,癌症和痴呆症相关死亡人数增加:结论:向限制性全科医生名单模式过渡与老年人较低的SMR和较少的超额死亡有关。这些发现强调了持续评估初级保健模式以确保其满足不断变化的医疗保健需求的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Change of primary health care service provider model in Vantaa: the impact on mortality and causes of death among older adults - a register-based follow-up study.

Background: Access to primary health care (PHC) has declined in Finland in recent years. To address this, the city of Vantaa, Finland, transitioned from a named general practitioner (GP) model to a restricted-list GP model in 2011 to increase access to named GPs for the most vulnerable population. This study evaluates the impact of this model change on mortality rates and causes of death among older adults.

Methods: This register-based follow-up study was conducted in Vantaa, Finland, using data from the electronic health records. The study included all patient contacts aged 75 and older between 1 September 2004 and 31 August 2018. The primary outcome was the Standardised Mortality Ratio (SMR). We calculated excess deaths and examined cause-specific mortality trends before and after the restricted-list GP model implementation.

Results: During the study period, 32,034 PHC contacts were recorded. The SMR remained stable during the named GP model years but began to decrease during the restricted-list GP model, falling below expected levels from 2016 onward. Excess deaths decreased from 615 in 2004 in the named GP model to -29 by 2018, when the restricted-list GP model was in operation. Leading causes of death were circulatory diseases (41.1%), cancers (20.4%) and neurological conditions (17.8%), with a decrease in circulatory disease deaths and an increase in cancer and dementia-related deaths over time.

Conclusions: The transition to the restricted-list GP model was associated with a lower SMR and fewer excess deaths in older adults. These findings highlight the importance of ongoing assessment of PHC models to ensure they meet evolving healthcare demands.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信