Conor Donnelly, Suhani S. Patel, Ian S. Jaffe, Daniyar Akizhanov, Teresa Po-Yu Chiang, Jane J. Long, Luckmini Liyanage, Adam Griesemer, Dorry L. Segev, Allan B. Massie
{"title":"儿童肝移植失败中功能、学术、运动和认知缺陷的关联","authors":"Conor Donnelly, Suhani S. Patel, Ian S. Jaffe, Daniyar Akizhanov, Teresa Po-Yu Chiang, Jane J. Long, Luckmini Liyanage, Adam Griesemer, Dorry L. Segev, Allan B. Massie","doi":"10.1111/ctr.70132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Predicting graft failure risk in pediatric liver transplantation (LT) recipients could identify areas for improving management. Persistent cognitive, motor, academic, and functional deficits are common in recipients and their impact on graft survival following LT helps inform risk prediction.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Using SRTR data 2008–2023, we evaluated the cognitive, motor, academic, and functional deficits of LT recipients at time of transplant to 14 years post-LT. We compared all cause graft failure (ACGF) among patients with versus without pre-LT and 1-year post-LT deficits using Cox regression, adjusting for recipient characteristics. We calculated an individual risk score for ACGF.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In 8062 pediatric LT recipients median age 3 (IQR: 1, 10), 28.0%, 29.5%, 35.0%, and 79.8% of recipients had pre-LT deficits in cognition, motor, academic activity, and functional status respectively. This decreased to 23.0%, 18.1%, 14.2%, and 38.7% 1-year post-LT. Increased hazard of ACGF was noted in recipients with pre-LT decreased functional status (aHR = 1.13 (per 10% decrease), 95% CI: 1.10–1.15, <i>p</i> < 0.001), definite motor delay (aHR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.21–2.10, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and inability to participate in academics (aHR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.08–1.89, <i>p</i> = 0.01), but not delays in cognition (aHR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.69–1.21, <i>p</i> = 0.19). Our risk score predicting ACGF demonstrated improved predictive performance compared to clinical parameters alone (C-statistic = 0.70 (0.67, 0.72) vs. 0.66 (0.64, 0.69), <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Pediatric LT recipients with pre- or post-LT motor, academic, and functional deficits are at higher risk for ACGF. Care should be taken to assess deficits to identify patients who may benefit from functional intervention to potentially reduce ACGF risk.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"39 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of Functional, Academic, Motor, and Cognitive Deficits in Graft Failure in Pediatric Liver Transplantation\",\"authors\":\"Conor Donnelly, Suhani S. Patel, Ian S. Jaffe, Daniyar Akizhanov, Teresa Po-Yu Chiang, Jane J. Long, Luckmini Liyanage, Adam Griesemer, Dorry L. Segev, Allan B. Massie\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ctr.70132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Predicting graft failure risk in pediatric liver transplantation (LT) recipients could identify areas for improving management. Persistent cognitive, motor, academic, and functional deficits are common in recipients and their impact on graft survival following LT helps inform risk prediction.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Using SRTR data 2008–2023, we evaluated the cognitive, motor, academic, and functional deficits of LT recipients at time of transplant to 14 years post-LT. We compared all cause graft failure (ACGF) among patients with versus without pre-LT and 1-year post-LT deficits using Cox regression, adjusting for recipient characteristics. We calculated an individual risk score for ACGF.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In 8062 pediatric LT recipients median age 3 (IQR: 1, 10), 28.0%, 29.5%, 35.0%, and 79.8% of recipients had pre-LT deficits in cognition, motor, academic activity, and functional status respectively. This decreased to 23.0%, 18.1%, 14.2%, and 38.7% 1-year post-LT. Increased hazard of ACGF was noted in recipients with pre-LT decreased functional status (aHR = 1.13 (per 10% decrease), 95% CI: 1.10–1.15, <i>p</i> < 0.001), definite motor delay (aHR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.21–2.10, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and inability to participate in academics (aHR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.08–1.89, <i>p</i> = 0.01), but not delays in cognition (aHR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.69–1.21, <i>p</i> = 0.19). Our risk score predicting ACGF demonstrated improved predictive performance compared to clinical parameters alone (C-statistic = 0.70 (0.67, 0.72) vs. 0.66 (0.64, 0.69), <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Pediatric LT recipients with pre- or post-LT motor, academic, and functional deficits are at higher risk for ACGF. Care should be taken to assess deficits to identify patients who may benefit from functional intervention to potentially reduce ACGF risk.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"39 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70132\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70132","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
预测儿童肝移植(LT)受者的移植失败风险可以确定需要改进管理的领域。持续的认知、运动、学术和功能缺陷在受体中很常见,它们对肝移植后移植物存活的影响有助于预测风险。方法使用2008-2023年的SRTR数据,我们评估了移植时至移植后14年的肝移植受者的认知、运动、学术和功能缺陷。我们使用Cox回归,调整受体特征,比较了移植前与非移植前和移植后1年缺陷患者的全因移植物衰竭(ACGF)。我们计算了ACGF的个体风险评分。结果在8062名中位年龄为3岁(IQR: 1,10)的儿童肝移植受者中,分别有28.0%、29.5%、35.0%和79.8%的受者在肝移植前存在认知、运动、学术活动和功能状态方面的缺陷。术后1年,这一比例分别降至23.0%、18.1%、14.2%和38.7%。在肝移植前功能状态下降的受者中,ACGF的危险增加(aHR = 1.13(每下降10%),95% CI: 1.10-1.15, p <;0.001),明确的运动延迟(aHR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.21-2.10, p <;0.001),无法参与学术活动(aHR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.08-1.89, p = 0.01),但没有认知延迟(aHR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.69-1.21, p = 0.19)。与单独的临床参数相比,我们的风险评分预测ACGF的预测效果更好(C-statistic = 0.70 (0.67, 0.72) vs. 0.66 (0.64, 0.69), p <;0.001)。结论:小儿LT受者在LT前或LT后存在运动、学业和功能缺陷,发生ACGF的风险更高。应注意评估缺陷,以确定可能从功能干预中获益的患者,以潜在地降低ACGF风险。
Association of Functional, Academic, Motor, and Cognitive Deficits in Graft Failure in Pediatric Liver Transplantation
Introduction
Predicting graft failure risk in pediatric liver transplantation (LT) recipients could identify areas for improving management. Persistent cognitive, motor, academic, and functional deficits are common in recipients and their impact on graft survival following LT helps inform risk prediction.
Methods
Using SRTR data 2008–2023, we evaluated the cognitive, motor, academic, and functional deficits of LT recipients at time of transplant to 14 years post-LT. We compared all cause graft failure (ACGF) among patients with versus without pre-LT and 1-year post-LT deficits using Cox regression, adjusting for recipient characteristics. We calculated an individual risk score for ACGF.
Results
In 8062 pediatric LT recipients median age 3 (IQR: 1, 10), 28.0%, 29.5%, 35.0%, and 79.8% of recipients had pre-LT deficits in cognition, motor, academic activity, and functional status respectively. This decreased to 23.0%, 18.1%, 14.2%, and 38.7% 1-year post-LT. Increased hazard of ACGF was noted in recipients with pre-LT decreased functional status (aHR = 1.13 (per 10% decrease), 95% CI: 1.10–1.15, p < 0.001), definite motor delay (aHR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.21–2.10, p < 0.001), and inability to participate in academics (aHR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.08–1.89, p = 0.01), but not delays in cognition (aHR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.69–1.21, p = 0.19). Our risk score predicting ACGF demonstrated improved predictive performance compared to clinical parameters alone (C-statistic = 0.70 (0.67, 0.72) vs. 0.66 (0.64, 0.69), p < 0.001).
Conclusions
Pediatric LT recipients with pre- or post-LT motor, academic, and functional deficits are at higher risk for ACGF. Care should be taken to assess deficits to identify patients who may benefit from functional intervention to potentially reduce ACGF risk.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored.
Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include:
Immunology and immunosuppression;
Patient preparation;
Social, ethical, and psychological issues;
Complications, short- and long-term results;
Artificial organs;
Donation and preservation of organ and tissue;
Translational studies;
Advances in tissue typing;
Updates on transplant pathology;.
Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries.
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.