临床实践指南建议可促进或破坏卫生公平

Nav Persaud
{"title":"临床实践指南建议可促进或破坏卫生公平","authors":"Nav Persaud","doi":"10.1002/gin2.70011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>While clinical practice guideline makers and methodologists signal the importance of considering inequities, recommendations often have little or nothing to do with fairness. Since inequities are, by definition avoidable, guidance on clinical practice is a prime opportunity to make health care more fair. Equity should be a central consideration when deciding who to involve in the guideline process, the guideline's scope, the type of information to consider, how to make recommendations and how to share recommendations. Guideline producers should select topics where guidance can actually address inequities and then use information about disparities to make helpful recommendations. Funders and journal editors should insist that guidelines explain how panels were formed and why new guidance on the topic is needed. Changes to clinical practice guidelines will not be enough to promote health equity, but guidelines can be part of the solution if they are thoughtfully produced and acted on by clinicians and by governments.</p>","PeriodicalId":100266,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Public Health Guidelines","volume":"2 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gin2.70011","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical practice guideline recommendations can promote or undermine health equity\",\"authors\":\"Nav Persaud\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/gin2.70011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>While clinical practice guideline makers and methodologists signal the importance of considering inequities, recommendations often have little or nothing to do with fairness. Since inequities are, by definition avoidable, guidance on clinical practice is a prime opportunity to make health care more fair. Equity should be a central consideration when deciding who to involve in the guideline process, the guideline's scope, the type of information to consider, how to make recommendations and how to share recommendations. Guideline producers should select topics where guidance can actually address inequities and then use information about disparities to make helpful recommendations. Funders and journal editors should insist that guidelines explain how panels were formed and why new guidance on the topic is needed. Changes to clinical practice guidelines will not be enough to promote health equity, but guidelines can be part of the solution if they are thoughtfully produced and acted on by clinicians and by governments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Public Health Guidelines\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gin2.70011\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Public Health Guidelines\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gin2.70011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Public Health Guidelines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gin2.70011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然临床实践指南的制定者和方法学家强调考虑不公平的重要性,但建议往往很少或根本没有与公平有关。从定义上讲,不公平是可以避免的,因此对临床实践的指导是使卫生保健更加公平的主要机会。在决定谁参与指南过程、指南的范围、要考虑的信息类型、如何提出建议以及如何分享建议时,公平应该是一个中心考虑因素。指南编写者应该选择指南能够真正解决不平等问题的主题,然后利用有关差异的信息提出有益的建议。资助者和期刊编辑应该坚持指导方针解释小组是如何组成的,以及为什么需要关于该主题的新指导。临床实践指南的改变将不足以促进卫生公平,但如果临床医生和政府深思熟虑地制定指南并据此采取行动,指南可以成为解决方案的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical practice guideline recommendations can promote or undermine health equity

While clinical practice guideline makers and methodologists signal the importance of considering inequities, recommendations often have little or nothing to do with fairness. Since inequities are, by definition avoidable, guidance on clinical practice is a prime opportunity to make health care more fair. Equity should be a central consideration when deciding who to involve in the guideline process, the guideline's scope, the type of information to consider, how to make recommendations and how to share recommendations. Guideline producers should select topics where guidance can actually address inequities and then use information about disparities to make helpful recommendations. Funders and journal editors should insist that guidelines explain how panels were formed and why new guidance on the topic is needed. Changes to clinical practice guidelines will not be enough to promote health equity, but guidelines can be part of the solution if they are thoughtfully produced and acted on by clinicians and by governments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信