粪卵计数减少试验:鉴定幼虫种类是否会提高其效用?

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PARASITOLOGY
Dave Leathwick, Peter Green, Charlotte Bouchet, Alex Chambers, Tania Waghorn, Christian Sauermann
{"title":"粪卵计数减少试验:鉴定幼虫种类是否会提高其效用?","authors":"Dave Leathwick,&nbsp;Peter Green,&nbsp;Charlotte Bouchet,&nbsp;Alex Chambers,&nbsp;Tania Waghorn,&nbsp;Christian Sauermann","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpddr.2025.100589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the faecal egg count reduction test, visual identification of larvae cultured from faeces enables the egg counts to be apportioned to species/genera, resulting in a more accurate test. However, morphology cannot reliably differentiate some species meaning that, in some cases, efficacy can only be estimated at the genus or species-complex level. We investigated the benefits of identifying larvae to species using DNA to determine how often this would alter the diagnosis of resistance and whether increasing the number of larvae identified would alter the repeatability of an efficacy estimate.</div><div>Data on faecal nematode egg counts and the corresponding larval species mixes were acquired from tests conducted on commercial sheep farms. The proportion of each species present in faecal culture was determined using DNA. Efficacy was then compared for individual species and for those genera/species complexes which cannot reliably be differentiated visually. The proportion of each species present was subsequently resampled 10,000 times (repeated random sampling) and efficacy recalculated to produce the median efficacy, along with the 5 % and 95 % simulation percentiles. Subsequently, the number of larvae sampled to determine the species mix in each sample was varied from 50 to 6400 and the process repeated.</div><div>Of 152 comparisons of efficacy, 25 % of cases where genus-level identification resulted in a finding of ‘susceptible’ for that category, species-level identification returned at least one diagnosis of ‘resistant’ i.e., genus-level identification resulted in a 25 % false negative diagnosis.</div><div>When the number of larvae sampled for species identification was low (&lt;400) variation in efficacy estimates was high, however, as sample size increased the confidence interval around the efficacy estimate decreased.</div><div>The results indicate that identifying large numbers of larvae to species using DNA has the potential to increase the accuracy and confidence in efficacy estimates achieved using the faecal egg count reduction test.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13775,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Parasitology: Drugs and Drug Resistance","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100589"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The faecal egg count reduction test: Will identification of larvae to species improve its utility?\",\"authors\":\"Dave Leathwick,&nbsp;Peter Green,&nbsp;Charlotte Bouchet,&nbsp;Alex Chambers,&nbsp;Tania Waghorn,&nbsp;Christian Sauermann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijpddr.2025.100589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In the faecal egg count reduction test, visual identification of larvae cultured from faeces enables the egg counts to be apportioned to species/genera, resulting in a more accurate test. However, morphology cannot reliably differentiate some species meaning that, in some cases, efficacy can only be estimated at the genus or species-complex level. We investigated the benefits of identifying larvae to species using DNA to determine how often this would alter the diagnosis of resistance and whether increasing the number of larvae identified would alter the repeatability of an efficacy estimate.</div><div>Data on faecal nematode egg counts and the corresponding larval species mixes were acquired from tests conducted on commercial sheep farms. The proportion of each species present in faecal culture was determined using DNA. Efficacy was then compared for individual species and for those genera/species complexes which cannot reliably be differentiated visually. The proportion of each species present was subsequently resampled 10,000 times (repeated random sampling) and efficacy recalculated to produce the median efficacy, along with the 5 % and 95 % simulation percentiles. Subsequently, the number of larvae sampled to determine the species mix in each sample was varied from 50 to 6400 and the process repeated.</div><div>Of 152 comparisons of efficacy, 25 % of cases where genus-level identification resulted in a finding of ‘susceptible’ for that category, species-level identification returned at least one diagnosis of ‘resistant’ i.e., genus-level identification resulted in a 25 % false negative diagnosis.</div><div>When the number of larvae sampled for species identification was low (&lt;400) variation in efficacy estimates was high, however, as sample size increased the confidence interval around the efficacy estimate decreased.</div><div>The results indicate that identifying large numbers of larvae to species using DNA has the potential to increase the accuracy and confidence in efficacy estimates achieved using the faecal egg count reduction test.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13775,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Parasitology: Drugs and Drug Resistance\",\"volume\":\"27 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100589\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Parasitology: Drugs and Drug Resistance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211320725000120\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PARASITOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Parasitology: Drugs and Drug Resistance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211320725000120","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在粪便卵数减少试验中,从粪便中培养的幼虫的目视识别使卵数分配到物种/属,从而产生更准确的测试。然而,形态学不能可靠地区分某些物种,这意味着在某些情况下,功效只能在属或种复合水平上进行估计。我们研究了利用DNA鉴定幼虫对物种的益处,以确定这将改变耐药性诊断的频率,以及增加鉴定的幼虫数量是否会改变功效估计的可重复性。粪便线虫卵数和相应幼虫种类混合的数据是从在商业绵羊养殖场进行的试验中获得的。利用DNA测定粪便培养中存在的每种物种的比例。然后比较了单个物种和那些不能可靠地通过视觉区分的属/种复合物的功效。随后,每种存在的物种的比例重新采样10,000次(重复随机采样),并重新计算功效,以产生中位功效,以及5%和95%的模拟百分位数。随后,每个样本中取样的幼虫数量从50到6400不等,以确定物种混合,并重复该过程。在152个疗效比较中,25%的属级鉴定结果为该类别的“易感”病例,种级鉴定结果至少为一个“耐药”诊断,即属级鉴定结果为25%的假阴性诊断。当用于物种鉴定的幼虫数量较少时(<400),功效估计值的差异很大,然而,随着样本量的增加,功效估计值周围的置信区间减小。结果表明,利用DNA鉴定大量幼虫有可能提高使用粪卵计数减少试验获得的功效估计的准确性和可信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The faecal egg count reduction test: Will identification of larvae to species improve its utility?

The faecal egg count reduction test: Will identification of larvae to species improve its utility?
In the faecal egg count reduction test, visual identification of larvae cultured from faeces enables the egg counts to be apportioned to species/genera, resulting in a more accurate test. However, morphology cannot reliably differentiate some species meaning that, in some cases, efficacy can only be estimated at the genus or species-complex level. We investigated the benefits of identifying larvae to species using DNA to determine how often this would alter the diagnosis of resistance and whether increasing the number of larvae identified would alter the repeatability of an efficacy estimate.
Data on faecal nematode egg counts and the corresponding larval species mixes were acquired from tests conducted on commercial sheep farms. The proportion of each species present in faecal culture was determined using DNA. Efficacy was then compared for individual species and for those genera/species complexes which cannot reliably be differentiated visually. The proportion of each species present was subsequently resampled 10,000 times (repeated random sampling) and efficacy recalculated to produce the median efficacy, along with the 5 % and 95 % simulation percentiles. Subsequently, the number of larvae sampled to determine the species mix in each sample was varied from 50 to 6400 and the process repeated.
Of 152 comparisons of efficacy, 25 % of cases where genus-level identification resulted in a finding of ‘susceptible’ for that category, species-level identification returned at least one diagnosis of ‘resistant’ i.e., genus-level identification resulted in a 25 % false negative diagnosis.
When the number of larvae sampled for species identification was low (<400) variation in efficacy estimates was high, however, as sample size increased the confidence interval around the efficacy estimate decreased.
The results indicate that identifying large numbers of larvae to species using DNA has the potential to increase the accuracy and confidence in efficacy estimates achieved using the faecal egg count reduction test.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
7.50%
发文量
31
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Parasitology – Drugs and Drug Resistance is one of a series of specialist, open access journals launched by the International Journal for Parasitology. It publishes the results of original research in the area of anti-parasite drug identification, development and evaluation, and parasite drug resistance. The journal also covers research into natural products as anti-parasitic agents, and bioactive parasite products. Studies can be aimed at unicellular or multicellular parasites of human or veterinary importance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信