土耳其语版儿童口吃测验的信度和效度

IF 1.8 3区医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY

Journal of Communication Disorders Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2025.106524

Ayşe İlayda Mutlu , Ayşen Köse , Şadiye Bacık Tırank

{"title":"土耳其语版儿童口吃测验的信度和效度","authors":"Ayşe İlayda Mutlu , Ayşen Köse , Şadiye Bacık Tırank","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2025.106524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Propose</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Test of Childhood Stuttering (TOCS).</div></div><div><h3>Methods & Procedure</h3><div>The TOCS was translated into Turkish, then back into English by a linguist, and reviewed by an evaluation committee. The translated version was administered to 50 children who stutter (CWS) and 50 who do not (CWNS). After 7–10 days, 12 randomly selected children were re-evaluated. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, test-retest methods, and inter-rater reliability. Content validity was confirmed through a pilot study and expert feedback. Construct validity was examined by analyzing test performance, comparing scores between CWS and CWNS, correlating modality test scores, and performing factor analysis. Criterion validity was assessed by correlating TOCS-TR scores with the Stuttering Severity Instrument-4 Turkish Version (SSI-4-TR).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Internal consistency was high, with Cronbach's alpha at .89. The test-retest correlation coefficient for Speech Fluency Measure subtest were .95, the Speech Fluency Rating Scale subtest was .91, and the Disfluency-Related Consequences Rating Scale Index was .91. Inter-rater reliability showed excellent agreement. Content validity was culturally appropriate. Construct validity indicated an 82% positive predictive value, 100% sensitivity, and 78% specificity for the Speech Fluency Rating Scale and Disfluency-Related Consequences Rating Scale. Criterion validity showed 80% agreement with SSI-4-TR.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions & Implications</h3><div>The TOCS-TR demonstrated strong reliability and validity, making it a valuable tool for assessing stuttering severity in children and distinguishing between CWS and CWNS</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Disorders","volume":"115 ","pages":"Article 106524"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the test of childhood stuttering (TOCS)\",\"authors\":\"Ayşe İlayda Mutlu , Ayşen Köse , Şadiye Bacık Tırank\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2025.106524\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Propose</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Test of Childhood Stuttering (TOCS).</div></div><div><h3>Methods & Procedure</h3><div>The TOCS was translated into Turkish, then back into English by a linguist, and reviewed by an evaluation committee. The translated version was administered to 50 children who stutter (CWS) and 50 who do not (CWNS). After 7–10 days, 12 randomly selected children were re-evaluated. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, test-retest methods, and inter-rater reliability. Content validity was confirmed through a pilot study and expert feedback. Construct validity was examined by analyzing test performance, comparing scores between CWS and CWNS, correlating modality test scores, and performing factor analysis. Criterion validity was assessed by correlating TOCS-TR scores with the Stuttering Severity Instrument-4 Turkish Version (SSI-4-TR).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Internal consistency was high, with Cronbach's alpha at .89. The test-retest correlation coefficient for Speech Fluency Measure subtest were .95, the Speech Fluency Rating Scale subtest was .91, and the Disfluency-Related Consequences Rating Scale Index was .91. Inter-rater reliability showed excellent agreement. Content validity was culturally appropriate. Construct validity indicated an 82% positive predictive value, 100% sensitivity, and 78% specificity for the Speech Fluency Rating Scale and Disfluency-Related Consequences Rating Scale. Criterion validity showed 80% agreement with SSI-4-TR.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions & Implications</h3><div>The TOCS-TR demonstrated strong reliability and validity, making it a valuable tool for assessing stuttering severity in children and distinguishing between CWS and CWNS</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Communication Disorders\",\"volume\":\"115 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106524\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Communication Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021992425000310\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021992425000310","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估土耳其语版儿童口吃测验（TOCS）的信度和效度。方法,TOCS被翻译成土耳其语，然后由语言学家翻译成英语，并由评估委员会审查。翻译后的版本被分配给50名口吃儿童（CWS）和50名非口吃儿童（CWNS）。7-10天后，随机选择12例患儿重新评估。信度采用Cronbach’s alpha、重测法和评估者间信度进行评估。通过初步研究和专家反馈确认了内容效度。通过分析测试绩效、比较CWS和CWNS的得分、相关模态测试得分和进行因子分析来检验结构效度。通过将TOCS-TR评分与口吃严重程度量表-4土耳其版（ssi4 - tr）相关联来评估标准效度。结果内部一致性高，Cronbach's alpha为0.89。言语流利度量表子测试重测相关系数为0.95，言语流利度评定量表子测试重测相关系数为0.91，言语流利度相关结果评定量表指数重测相关系数为0.91。评估者间信度表现出极好的一致性。内容效度在文化上是适当的。建构效度表明，言语流利度评定量表和不流利相关后果评定量表的阳性预测值为82%，灵敏度为100%，特异性为78%。标准效度与si -4- tr的一致性为80%。结论,结论TOCS-TR具有较强的信度和效度，可作为评估儿童口吃严重程度和区分CWS与CWNS的重要工具

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the test of childhood stuttering (TOCS)

Propose

This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Test of Childhood Stuttering (TOCS).

Methods & Procedure

The TOCS was translated into Turkish, then back into English by a linguist, and reviewed by an evaluation committee. The translated version was administered to 50 children who stutter (CWS) and 50 who do not (CWNS). After 7–10 days, 12 randomly selected children were re-evaluated. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, test-retest methods, and inter-rater reliability. Content validity was confirmed through a pilot study and expert feedback. Construct validity was examined by analyzing test performance, comparing scores between CWS and CWNS, correlating modality test scores, and performing factor analysis. Criterion validity was assessed by correlating TOCS-TR scores with the Stuttering Severity Instrument-4 Turkish Version (SSI-4-TR).

Results

Internal consistency was high, with Cronbach's alpha at .89. The test-retest correlation coefficient for Speech Fluency Measure subtest were .95, the Speech Fluency Rating Scale subtest was .91, and the Disfluency-Related Consequences Rating Scale Index was .91. Inter-rater reliability showed excellent agreement. Content validity was culturally appropriate. Construct validity indicated an 82% positive predictive value, 100% sensitivity, and 78% specificity for the Speech Fluency Rating Scale and Disfluency-Related Consequences Rating Scale. Criterion validity showed 80% agreement with SSI-4-TR.

Conclusions & Implications

The TOCS-TR demonstrated strong reliability and validity, making it a valuable tool for assessing stuttering severity in children and distinguishing between CWS and CWNS

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Communication Disorders AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION

CiteScore

3.30

自引率

5.90%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of Communication Disorders publishes original articles on topics related to disorders of speech, language and hearing. Authors are encouraged to submit reports of experimental or descriptive investigations (research articles), review articles, tutorials or discussion papers, or letters to the editor ("short communications"). Please note that we do not accept case studies unless they conform to the principles of single-subject experimental design. Special issues are published periodically on timely and clinically relevant topics.