Md Hasanuzzaman , Biswajit Bera , Aznarul Islam , Pravat Kumar Shit
{"title":"探索基于gis的模型来评估恒河河岸侵蚀的社会脆弱性","authors":"Md Hasanuzzaman , Biswajit Bera , Aznarul Islam , Pravat Kumar Shit","doi":"10.1016/j.nhres.2024.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Riverside communities along the lower Ganges in India face significant threats like riverbank erosion, floods, and climate change impacts. Despite extensive research on riverbank erosion in the region, a key gap remains in understanding how erosion and climate change jointly affect local communities. Additionally, research prioritizing village-level studies and strategies is urgently needed for effective management of the study area. This study aimed to compute a GIS-based Social Vulnerability Index (SociVI) by assessing 10 components and 31 sub-components at the village level. We used spatial analysis techniques like Moran's I and Getis-Ord G∗ to identify hotspots and clustering patterns among variables and SociVI values. Principal component analysis (PCA) and multi-correlation statistics determined the most significant component. Our fieldwork involved surveying 1641 households, 547 focus group discussions, and 12 key informant interviews across 547 villages. The SociVI analysis revealed that residents on the left bank of the river, particularly in the upper section of the Farakka barrage, and those living in the char villages were highly susceptible to social vulnerability. Scores ranged from 0.67 to 0.88, with 34 villages (6.22%) on the left bank and 8 villages (1.46%) on the right bank showing notably high SociVI values. Furthermore, our hot spot analysis identified 51 villages (9.32%) as hot spots with 99% confidence, 7.13% of which were located on the left bank and 2.19% on the right bank. According to the PCA results, demographics (PC1), riverbank calamities (PC2), displacement of households (PC3), and climatic variability (PC4) emerged as the most significant factors. This study's findings are crucial, highlighting critical areas and villages requiring focused efforts to reduce local vulnerability and bolster adaptation capacities amid these challenges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100943,"journal":{"name":"Natural Hazards Research","volume":"5 1","pages":"Pages 134-147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring GIS-based modeling for assessing social vulnerability to Ganga Riverbank erosion, India\",\"authors\":\"Md Hasanuzzaman , Biswajit Bera , Aznarul Islam , Pravat Kumar Shit\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nhres.2024.08.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Riverside communities along the lower Ganges in India face significant threats like riverbank erosion, floods, and climate change impacts. Despite extensive research on riverbank erosion in the region, a key gap remains in understanding how erosion and climate change jointly affect local communities. Additionally, research prioritizing village-level studies and strategies is urgently needed for effective management of the study area. This study aimed to compute a GIS-based Social Vulnerability Index (SociVI) by assessing 10 components and 31 sub-components at the village level. We used spatial analysis techniques like Moran's I and Getis-Ord G∗ to identify hotspots and clustering patterns among variables and SociVI values. Principal component analysis (PCA) and multi-correlation statistics determined the most significant component. Our fieldwork involved surveying 1641 households, 547 focus group discussions, and 12 key informant interviews across 547 villages. The SociVI analysis revealed that residents on the left bank of the river, particularly in the upper section of the Farakka barrage, and those living in the char villages were highly susceptible to social vulnerability. Scores ranged from 0.67 to 0.88, with 34 villages (6.22%) on the left bank and 8 villages (1.46%) on the right bank showing notably high SociVI values. Furthermore, our hot spot analysis identified 51 villages (9.32%) as hot spots with 99% confidence, 7.13% of which were located on the left bank and 2.19% on the right bank. According to the PCA results, demographics (PC1), riverbank calamities (PC2), displacement of households (PC3), and climatic variability (PC4) emerged as the most significant factors. This study's findings are crucial, highlighting critical areas and villages requiring focused efforts to reduce local vulnerability and bolster adaptation capacities amid these challenges.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Natural Hazards Research\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 134-147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Natural Hazards Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666592124000581\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Hazards Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666592124000581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
印度恒河下游的河边社区面临着河岸侵蚀、洪水和气候变化影响等重大威胁。尽管对该地区的河岸侵蚀进行了广泛的研究,但在了解侵蚀和气候变化如何共同影响当地社区方面仍然存在一个关键差距。此外,为了有效地管理研究区域,迫切需要优先考虑村一级的研究和战略。本研究旨在通过对村庄层面的10个组成部分和31个子组成部分进行评估,计算基于gis的社会脆弱性指数(SociVI)。我们使用Moran's I和Getis-Ord G *等空间分析技术来识别变量和社会价值之间的热点和聚类模式。主成分分析(PCA)和多相关统计确定了最显著成分。我们的实地工作包括在547个村庄调查1641个家庭,进行547个焦点小组讨论,并对12个关键信息提供者进行访谈。SociVI的分析显示,河流左岸的居民,特别是法拉卡拦河坝上游的居民,以及居住在char村的居民,极易受到社会脆弱性的影响。得分范围为0.67 ~ 0.88,其中左岸34个村(6.22%)和右岸8个村(1.46%)的SociVI值显著较高。此外,我们的热点分析确定51个村庄(9.32%)为热点,置信度为99%,其中7.13%位于左岸,2.19%位于右岸。根据PCA结果,人口统计(PC1)、河岸灾害(PC2)、家庭流离失所(PC3)和气候变率(PC4)是最显著的影响因素。这项研究的发现是至关重要的,它突出了需要集中努力减少当地脆弱性和加强应对这些挑战的适应能力的关键地区和村庄。
Exploring GIS-based modeling for assessing social vulnerability to Ganga Riverbank erosion, India
Riverside communities along the lower Ganges in India face significant threats like riverbank erosion, floods, and climate change impacts. Despite extensive research on riverbank erosion in the region, a key gap remains in understanding how erosion and climate change jointly affect local communities. Additionally, research prioritizing village-level studies and strategies is urgently needed for effective management of the study area. This study aimed to compute a GIS-based Social Vulnerability Index (SociVI) by assessing 10 components and 31 sub-components at the village level. We used spatial analysis techniques like Moran's I and Getis-Ord G∗ to identify hotspots and clustering patterns among variables and SociVI values. Principal component analysis (PCA) and multi-correlation statistics determined the most significant component. Our fieldwork involved surveying 1641 households, 547 focus group discussions, and 12 key informant interviews across 547 villages. The SociVI analysis revealed that residents on the left bank of the river, particularly in the upper section of the Farakka barrage, and those living in the char villages were highly susceptible to social vulnerability. Scores ranged from 0.67 to 0.88, with 34 villages (6.22%) on the left bank and 8 villages (1.46%) on the right bank showing notably high SociVI values. Furthermore, our hot spot analysis identified 51 villages (9.32%) as hot spots with 99% confidence, 7.13% of which were located on the left bank and 2.19% on the right bank. According to the PCA results, demographics (PC1), riverbank calamities (PC2), displacement of households (PC3), and climatic variability (PC4) emerged as the most significant factors. This study's findings are crucial, highlighting critical areas and villages requiring focused efforts to reduce local vulnerability and bolster adaptation capacities amid these challenges.