基于接纳与承诺疗法的青年员工在线小组项目对幸福感的影响:单例A-B设计。

Environmental and occupational health practice Pub Date : 2025-01-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1539/eohp.2024-0015-FS
Anna Tozawa, Masao Tsuchiya
{"title":"基于接纳与承诺疗法的青年员工在线小组项目对幸福感的影响:单例A-B设计。","authors":"Anna Tozawa, Masao Tsuchiya","doi":"10.1539/eohp.2024-0015-FS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examined the effects of an online group program based on acceptance and commitment therapy for young employees on employee well-being.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a single-case A-B design, this study implemented a program that spanned three 90-min sessions among 24 employees of a Japanese company, who were up to 3 years after graduation from university or postgraduate studies. The baseline (times 1-5) phase was conducted across 15 days, followed by the intervention, which was conducted over 16 days. The intervention (times 6-10) phase was conducted over 35 days following session 1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen participants met the inclusion criteria. A hierarchical Bayesian model indicated that the hypotheses were not supported in terms of the primary outcome of well-being and process outcome of psychological inflexibility of 10 employees because the credible interval included 0 (well-being: expected a posteriori estimation [EAP] 0.22; 95% credible interval, -0.31 to 0.81; Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: EAP -2.20; 95% credible interval, -5.60 to 1.31). Tau-U for well-being varied from -0.56 to 0.84 among the participants. Similarly, for the secondary outcomes of 13 employees, the hypotheses were not supported for work performance, work engagement, and stress reaction (World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire: EAP -0.32; 95% credible interval, -1.22 to 0.57; Utrecht Work Engagement Scale-3: EAP -0.08; 95% credible interval, -0.47 to 0.34; stress reaction: EAP -0.49; 95% credible interval, -3.76 to 2.66).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The online group program implemented in this study did not improve employee well-being.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study protocol was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (ID: UMIN000042912).</p>","PeriodicalId":520443,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and occupational health practice","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11933621/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of an online group program based on acceptance and commitment therapy for young employees on well-being: single-case A-B design.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Tozawa, Masao Tsuchiya\",\"doi\":\"10.1539/eohp.2024-0015-FS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examined the effects of an online group program based on acceptance and commitment therapy for young employees on employee well-being.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a single-case A-B design, this study implemented a program that spanned three 90-min sessions among 24 employees of a Japanese company, who were up to 3 years after graduation from university or postgraduate studies. The baseline (times 1-5) phase was conducted across 15 days, followed by the intervention, which was conducted over 16 days. The intervention (times 6-10) phase was conducted over 35 days following session 1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen participants met the inclusion criteria. A hierarchical Bayesian model indicated that the hypotheses were not supported in terms of the primary outcome of well-being and process outcome of psychological inflexibility of 10 employees because the credible interval included 0 (well-being: expected a posteriori estimation [EAP] 0.22; 95% credible interval, -0.31 to 0.81; Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: EAP -2.20; 95% credible interval, -5.60 to 1.31). Tau-U for well-being varied from -0.56 to 0.84 among the participants. Similarly, for the secondary outcomes of 13 employees, the hypotheses were not supported for work performance, work engagement, and stress reaction (World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire: EAP -0.32; 95% credible interval, -1.22 to 0.57; Utrecht Work Engagement Scale-3: EAP -0.08; 95% credible interval, -0.47 to 0.34; stress reaction: EAP -0.49; 95% credible interval, -3.76 to 2.66).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The online group program implemented in this study did not improve employee well-being.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study protocol was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (ID: UMIN000042912).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental and occupational health practice\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11933621/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental and occupational health practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1539/eohp.2024-0015-FS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and occupational health practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1539/eohp.2024-0015-FS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究考察了基于接纳与承诺疗法的青年员工在线团体项目对员工幸福感的影响。方法:采用单案例a - b设计,本研究在一家日本公司的24名员工中实施了一项计划,该计划跨越三个90分钟的会议,这些员工在大学或研究生学习后最多3年。基线(1-5次)阶段在15天内进行,随后进行干预,为期16天。干预(6-10次)阶段在第1阶段后的35天内进行。结果:14名受试者符合纳入标准。层次贝叶斯模型表明,10名员工的幸福感初级结果和心理不灵活性过程结果的假设不被支持,因为可信区间为0(幸福感:期望后验估计[EAP] 0.22;95%可信区间为-0.31 ~ 0.81;接受与行动问卷- ii: EAP -2.20;95%可信区间为-5.60 ~ 1.31)。在参与者中,幸福感的Tau-U值从-0.56到0.84不等。同样,对于13名员工的次要结果,工作绩效、工作投入和压力反应的假设不被支持(世界卫生组织健康与工作绩效问卷:EAP -0.32;95%可信区间为-1.22 ~ 0.57;乌得勒支工作投入量表-3:EAP -0.08;95%可信区间为-0.47 ~ 0.34;应激反应:EAP -0.49;95%可信区间为-3.76 ~ 2.66)。结论:本研究实施的在线团体计划并没有改善员工的幸福感。试验注册:研究方案已在大学医院医学信息网临床试验注册中心注册(ID: UMIN000042912)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of an online group program based on acceptance and commitment therapy for young employees on well-being: single-case A-B design.

Objectives: This study examined the effects of an online group program based on acceptance and commitment therapy for young employees on employee well-being.

Methods: Using a single-case A-B design, this study implemented a program that spanned three 90-min sessions among 24 employees of a Japanese company, who were up to 3 years after graduation from university or postgraduate studies. The baseline (times 1-5) phase was conducted across 15 days, followed by the intervention, which was conducted over 16 days. The intervention (times 6-10) phase was conducted over 35 days following session 1.

Results: Fourteen participants met the inclusion criteria. A hierarchical Bayesian model indicated that the hypotheses were not supported in terms of the primary outcome of well-being and process outcome of psychological inflexibility of 10 employees because the credible interval included 0 (well-being: expected a posteriori estimation [EAP] 0.22; 95% credible interval, -0.31 to 0.81; Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: EAP -2.20; 95% credible interval, -5.60 to 1.31). Tau-U for well-being varied from -0.56 to 0.84 among the participants. Similarly, for the secondary outcomes of 13 employees, the hypotheses were not supported for work performance, work engagement, and stress reaction (World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire: EAP -0.32; 95% credible interval, -1.22 to 0.57; Utrecht Work Engagement Scale-3: EAP -0.08; 95% credible interval, -0.47 to 0.34; stress reaction: EAP -0.49; 95% credible interval, -3.76 to 2.66).

Conclusions: The online group program implemented in this study did not improve employee well-being.

Trial registration: The study protocol was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (ID: UMIN000042912).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信