反向脆性指数在手外科随机对照试验中的应用。

IF 1.6
Rodney Ahdoot, Bhuvan Pottepalem, Trista M Benítez, Chien-Wei Wang, Kevin C Chung
{"title":"反向脆性指数在手外科随机对照试验中的应用。","authors":"Rodney Ahdoot, Bhuvan Pottepalem, Trista M Benítez, Chien-Wei Wang, Kevin C Chung","doi":"10.1177/17531934251327880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The reverse fragility index (RFI) is a tool used to measure the robustness of statistically non-significant outcomes by quantifying the minimum event changes required to achieve significance. This study applies the RFI and reverse fragility quotient (RFQ) to hand surgery randomized control trials (RCTs). A systematic review of 15 journals yielded 25 RCTs with 43 non-significant, dichotomous outcomes published from 2000 to 2024. The RFI was calculated using Fisher's exact test and the RFQ was calculated by dividing the RFI by the sample size. The median RFI was 4 and the median RFQ was 0.056. Loss to follow-up was not clearly reported in 24% of studies and loss to follow-up exceeded the RFI in 56% of outcomes. Hand surgery RCTs demonstrate fragility in non-significant findings, with a small number of event changes potentially altering conclusions. The RFI and RFQ are useful measures that complement traditional <i>p</i>-values, offering more context in interpreting clinical trial results.</p>","PeriodicalId":94237,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume","volume":" ","pages":"1274-1280"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The application of the reverse fragility index to randomized controlled trials in hand surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Rodney Ahdoot, Bhuvan Pottepalem, Trista M Benítez, Chien-Wei Wang, Kevin C Chung\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17531934251327880\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The reverse fragility index (RFI) is a tool used to measure the robustness of statistically non-significant outcomes by quantifying the minimum event changes required to achieve significance. This study applies the RFI and reverse fragility quotient (RFQ) to hand surgery randomized control trials (RCTs). A systematic review of 15 journals yielded 25 RCTs with 43 non-significant, dichotomous outcomes published from 2000 to 2024. The RFI was calculated using Fisher's exact test and the RFQ was calculated by dividing the RFI by the sample size. The median RFI was 4 and the median RFQ was 0.056. Loss to follow-up was not clearly reported in 24% of studies and loss to follow-up exceeded the RFI in 56% of outcomes. Hand surgery RCTs demonstrate fragility in non-significant findings, with a small number of event changes potentially altering conclusions. The RFI and RFQ are useful measures that complement traditional <i>p</i>-values, offering more context in interpreting clinical trial results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1274-1280\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934251327880\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934251327880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

反向脆弱性指数(RFI)是一种通过量化达到显著性所需的最小事件变化来衡量统计上不显著结果的稳健性的工具。本研究将RFI和反向脆弱性商数(RFQ)应用于手外科随机对照试验(rct)。对2000年至2024年间发表的15份期刊的系统回顾得出了25项随机对照试验,其中有43项不显著的二分类结果。RFI使用Fisher精确检验计算,RFQ通过将RFI除以样本量计算。中位RFI为4,中位RFQ为0.056。24%的研究没有明确报告随访损失,56%的研究结果随访损失超过RFI。手外科随机对照试验在非显著结果中表现出脆弱性,少量事件变化可能改变结论。RFI和RFQ是补充传统p值的有用措施,为解释临床试验结果提供了更多的背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The application of the reverse fragility index to randomized controlled trials in hand surgery.

The reverse fragility index (RFI) is a tool used to measure the robustness of statistically non-significant outcomes by quantifying the minimum event changes required to achieve significance. This study applies the RFI and reverse fragility quotient (RFQ) to hand surgery randomized control trials (RCTs). A systematic review of 15 journals yielded 25 RCTs with 43 non-significant, dichotomous outcomes published from 2000 to 2024. The RFI was calculated using Fisher's exact test and the RFQ was calculated by dividing the RFI by the sample size. The median RFI was 4 and the median RFQ was 0.056. Loss to follow-up was not clearly reported in 24% of studies and loss to follow-up exceeded the RFI in 56% of outcomes. Hand surgery RCTs demonstrate fragility in non-significant findings, with a small number of event changes potentially altering conclusions. The RFI and RFQ are useful measures that complement traditional p-values, offering more context in interpreting clinical trial results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信