Savino Cilla, Romina Rossi, Costanza Maria Donati, Ragnhild Habberstad, Pal Klepstad, Monia Dall'Agata, Vanessa Valenti, Stein Kaasa, Federica Medici, Alessio Giuseppe Morganti, Marco Maltoni
{"title":"骨转移患者疼痛管理的充分性:来自姑息性放疗和炎症研究试验的二次分析。","authors":"Savino Cilla, Romina Rossi, Costanza Maria Donati, Ragnhild Habberstad, Pal Klepstad, Monia Dall'Agata, Vanessa Valenti, Stein Kaasa, Federica Medici, Alessio Giuseppe Morganti, Marco Maltoni","doi":"10.1177/11795549241297054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bone metastases (BMs) are a common complication in patients with cancer, often leading to significant pain that adversely affects quality of life, necessitating effective pain management strategies. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of pain management in patients with BMs undergoing palliative radiotherapy and to identify determinants of pain management adequacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an observational analysis of 560 patients from the Palliative Radiotherapy and Inflammation Study (PRAIS) trial across several European centers, focusing on the Pain Management Index (PMI) for assessing pain management adequacy. Key predictors examined included Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), treatment setting, primary tumor type, and site of BMs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings indicate that 19.0% of patients experienced inadequate pain management (PMI < 0). Specifically, patients with KPS ⩾ 90 had a notably lower rate of adequate analgesic therapy (59.3%) compared with those with a KPS < 90 (85.0%). Among outpatients, 23.7% reported inadequate pain management, contrasted with a significantly lower inadequacy rate (3.8%) in palliative care or hospice settings. In addition, in outpatients, pain management adequacy varied with the primary tumor type, showing improved outcomes for patients with lung cancer (89.2%) versus other primary tumors (79.1%). Moreover, in non-outpatients, pain management was less effective for patients receiving radiotherapy on pelvic BMs (89.5%) compared with other sites (95.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although overall rates of inadequate pain management were lower than seen in previous studies, significant variability exists based on patient health status, care setting, primary tumor type, and site of BMs. These results underscore the need for personalized pain management approaches and highlight specific areas for improvement in outpatient settings and among patients with generally good health but significant pain from BMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48591,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine Insights-Oncology","volume":"19 ","pages":"11795549241297054"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11938461/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pain Management Adequacy in Patients With Bone Metastases: A Secondary Analysis From the Palliative Radiotherapy and Inflammation Study Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Savino Cilla, Romina Rossi, Costanza Maria Donati, Ragnhild Habberstad, Pal Klepstad, Monia Dall'Agata, Vanessa Valenti, Stein Kaasa, Federica Medici, Alessio Giuseppe Morganti, Marco Maltoni\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11795549241297054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bone metastases (BMs) are a common complication in patients with cancer, often leading to significant pain that adversely affects quality of life, necessitating effective pain management strategies. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of pain management in patients with BMs undergoing palliative radiotherapy and to identify determinants of pain management adequacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an observational analysis of 560 patients from the Palliative Radiotherapy and Inflammation Study (PRAIS) trial across several European centers, focusing on the Pain Management Index (PMI) for assessing pain management adequacy. Key predictors examined included Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), treatment setting, primary tumor type, and site of BMs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings indicate that 19.0% of patients experienced inadequate pain management (PMI < 0). Specifically, patients with KPS ⩾ 90 had a notably lower rate of adequate analgesic therapy (59.3%) compared with those with a KPS < 90 (85.0%). Among outpatients, 23.7% reported inadequate pain management, contrasted with a significantly lower inadequacy rate (3.8%) in palliative care or hospice settings. In addition, in outpatients, pain management adequacy varied with the primary tumor type, showing improved outcomes for patients with lung cancer (89.2%) versus other primary tumors (79.1%). Moreover, in non-outpatients, pain management was less effective for patients receiving radiotherapy on pelvic BMs (89.5%) compared with other sites (95.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although overall rates of inadequate pain management were lower than seen in previous studies, significant variability exists based on patient health status, care setting, primary tumor type, and site of BMs. These results underscore the need for personalized pain management approaches and highlight specific areas for improvement in outpatient settings and among patients with generally good health but significant pain from BMs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Medicine Insights-Oncology\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"11795549241297054\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11938461/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Medicine Insights-Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11795549241297054\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine Insights-Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11795549241297054","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:骨转移(BMs)是癌症患者常见的并发症,通常会导致严重的疼痛,对生活质量产生不利影响,需要有效的疼痛管理策略。本研究旨在评估接受姑息性放疗的脑转移患者疼痛管理的有效性,并确定疼痛管理充分性的决定因素。方法:我们对来自欧洲几个中心的姑息放疗和炎症研究(PRAIS)试验的560例患者进行了观察性分析,重点关注疼痛管理指数(PMI),以评估疼痛管理的充分性。检查的关键预测因素包括Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS)、治疗环境、原发肿瘤类型和脑转移部位。结果:我们的研究结果表明,19.0%的患者经历了疼痛管理不足(PMI)。结论:尽管疼痛管理不足的总体发生率低于以往的研究,但根据患者的健康状况、护理环境、原发肿瘤类型和脑转移部位,存在显著的差异。这些结果强调了个性化疼痛管理方法的必要性,并强调了门诊设置和总体健康状况良好但脑转移引起明显疼痛的患者需要改进的特定领域。
Pain Management Adequacy in Patients With Bone Metastases: A Secondary Analysis From the Palliative Radiotherapy and Inflammation Study Trial.
Background: Bone metastases (BMs) are a common complication in patients with cancer, often leading to significant pain that adversely affects quality of life, necessitating effective pain management strategies. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of pain management in patients with BMs undergoing palliative radiotherapy and to identify determinants of pain management adequacy.
Methods: We conducted an observational analysis of 560 patients from the Palliative Radiotherapy and Inflammation Study (PRAIS) trial across several European centers, focusing on the Pain Management Index (PMI) for assessing pain management adequacy. Key predictors examined included Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), treatment setting, primary tumor type, and site of BMs.
Results: Our findings indicate that 19.0% of patients experienced inadequate pain management (PMI < 0). Specifically, patients with KPS ⩾ 90 had a notably lower rate of adequate analgesic therapy (59.3%) compared with those with a KPS < 90 (85.0%). Among outpatients, 23.7% reported inadequate pain management, contrasted with a significantly lower inadequacy rate (3.8%) in palliative care or hospice settings. In addition, in outpatients, pain management adequacy varied with the primary tumor type, showing improved outcomes for patients with lung cancer (89.2%) versus other primary tumors (79.1%). Moreover, in non-outpatients, pain management was less effective for patients receiving radiotherapy on pelvic BMs (89.5%) compared with other sites (95.7%).
Conclusion: Although overall rates of inadequate pain management were lower than seen in previous studies, significant variability exists based on patient health status, care setting, primary tumor type, and site of BMs. These results underscore the need for personalized pain management approaches and highlight specific areas for improvement in outpatient settings and among patients with generally good health but significant pain from BMs.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on all aspects of cancer research and treatment, in addition to related genetic, pathophysiological and epidemiological topics. Of particular but not exclusive importance are molecular biology, clinical interventions, controlled trials, therapeutics, pharmacology and drug delivery, and techniques of cancer surgery. The journal welcomes unsolicited article proposals.