食管癌最好的手术方式是什么?

IF 1.7 Q2 SURGERY
Innovative Surgical Sciences Pub Date : 2024-12-06 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1515/iss-2023-0021
Verena Tripke, Vladimir J Lozanovski, Carolina Mann, Hauke Lang, Peter P Grimminger
{"title":"食管癌最好的手术方式是什么?","authors":"Verena Tripke, Vladimir J Lozanovski, Carolina Mann, Hauke Lang, Peter P Grimminger","doi":"10.1515/iss-2023-0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Esophageal cancer is an aggressive tumor entity, and oncologic esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy after perioperative chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy is the standard of care for curative treatment. Oncological esophagectomy is a complex procedure associated with a relevant surgical trauma. Complications, such as severe pulmonary infections and anastomotic leakage with mediastinitis lead to a high morbidity rate. To reduce the surgical trauma, the minimally invasive technique was introduced in esophageal surgery. Minimally invasive esophagectomy is associated with less postoperative pain and a reduced rate of pulmonary infections. Currently, there are two major different totally minimally invasive techniques, the conventional laparoscopic/thoracoscopic approach (MIE) and the robotic assisted approach (RAMIE). Both methods require teaching due to the flat learning curve associated with these complex procedures. However, both MIE and RAMIE are performed safely in specialized centers. They are associated with improved short-term outcome and similar oncological outcome compared to open esophagectomy. The robotic assisted approach has additional benefits that may be supported by the results of more randomized controlled trials in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":44186,"journal":{"name":"Innovative Surgical Sciences","volume":"10 1","pages":"31-35"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11934937/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is the best surgical approach for esophageal cancer?\",\"authors\":\"Verena Tripke, Vladimir J Lozanovski, Carolina Mann, Hauke Lang, Peter P Grimminger\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/iss-2023-0021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Esophageal cancer is an aggressive tumor entity, and oncologic esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy after perioperative chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy is the standard of care for curative treatment. Oncological esophagectomy is a complex procedure associated with a relevant surgical trauma. Complications, such as severe pulmonary infections and anastomotic leakage with mediastinitis lead to a high morbidity rate. To reduce the surgical trauma, the minimally invasive technique was introduced in esophageal surgery. Minimally invasive esophagectomy is associated with less postoperative pain and a reduced rate of pulmonary infections. Currently, there are two major different totally minimally invasive techniques, the conventional laparoscopic/thoracoscopic approach (MIE) and the robotic assisted approach (RAMIE). Both methods require teaching due to the flat learning curve associated with these complex procedures. However, both MIE and RAMIE are performed safely in specialized centers. They are associated with improved short-term outcome and similar oncological outcome compared to open esophagectomy. The robotic assisted approach has additional benefits that may be supported by the results of more randomized controlled trials in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovative Surgical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"31-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11934937/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovative Surgical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/iss-2023-0021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovative Surgical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/iss-2023-0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

食管癌是侵袭性肿瘤,围手术期化疗或放化疗后行肿瘤性食管切除术加双野淋巴结切除术是根治性治疗的标准护理。肿瘤食管切除术是一项复杂的手术,伴有相关的外科创伤。严重的肺部感染和吻合口漏合并纵隔炎等并发症导致高发病率。为了减少手术创伤,将微创技术引入食管手术。微创食管切除术术后疼痛减轻,肺部感染发生率降低。目前,主要有两种不同的全微创技术,传统的腹腔镜/胸腔镜入路(MIE)和机器人辅助入路(RAMIE)。这两种方法都需要教学,因为与这些复杂的过程相关的平坦的学习曲线。然而,MIE和RAMIE都是在专门的中心安全地进行的。与开放式食管切除术相比,它们具有改善的短期预后和相似的肿瘤预后。机器人辅助的方法有额外的好处,可能会得到未来更多随机对照试验结果的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What is the best surgical approach for esophageal cancer?

Esophageal cancer is an aggressive tumor entity, and oncologic esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy after perioperative chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy is the standard of care for curative treatment. Oncological esophagectomy is a complex procedure associated with a relevant surgical trauma. Complications, such as severe pulmonary infections and anastomotic leakage with mediastinitis lead to a high morbidity rate. To reduce the surgical trauma, the minimally invasive technique was introduced in esophageal surgery. Minimally invasive esophagectomy is associated with less postoperative pain and a reduced rate of pulmonary infections. Currently, there are two major different totally minimally invasive techniques, the conventional laparoscopic/thoracoscopic approach (MIE) and the robotic assisted approach (RAMIE). Both methods require teaching due to the flat learning curve associated with these complex procedures. However, both MIE and RAMIE are performed safely in specialized centers. They are associated with improved short-term outcome and similar oncological outcome compared to open esophagectomy. The robotic assisted approach has additional benefits that may be supported by the results of more randomized controlled trials in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信