医学实践中的钟摆

Q2 Medicine
Mathias E Kant
{"title":"医学实践中的钟摆","authors":"Mathias E Kant","doi":"10.1177/00258172241304558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medicine is taught as a science, but in reality, as with other areas that undergo much public scrutiny, it is often more of an art than a science. Particularly when dealing with controversial areas, physicians often attempt to employ the \"standard of care\" as a guide to practising medicine, and to protect themselves. However, the standard of care itself is often a reactive and temporary construct. A number of practices serve as good examples of accepted patient care that has swung completely from one extreme to another. The history of opiate prescribing in this country exemplifies a complete swing in practice fundamentals among US physicians, where opiates have been repeatedly embraced, and then vilified. Numerous other practices demonstrating this phenomenon can be cited, including the use of electroconvulsive therapy for depression, and hormone replacement for postmenopausal women. Research funding itself has been subject to pendulum swings, such as occurred during the recent pandemic. Currently, there are a number of similar, very active issues of debate, such as marijuana for widespread medical use, and the employment of hallucinogens for addiction and other mental health disorders. Considerable harm has occurred to some patients when extremes of these pendulum swings have impacted their medical care. It is urged that in practising medicine, physicians consider the entire body of medical evidence accumulated during these pendulum swings, and then have the courage and wisdom to represent the best interests of their patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":35529,"journal":{"name":"Medico-Legal Journal","volume":" ","pages":"258172241304558"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pendulums in medical practice.\",\"authors\":\"Mathias E Kant\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00258172241304558\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Medicine is taught as a science, but in reality, as with other areas that undergo much public scrutiny, it is often more of an art than a science. Particularly when dealing with controversial areas, physicians often attempt to employ the \\\"standard of care\\\" as a guide to practising medicine, and to protect themselves. However, the standard of care itself is often a reactive and temporary construct. A number of practices serve as good examples of accepted patient care that has swung completely from one extreme to another. The history of opiate prescribing in this country exemplifies a complete swing in practice fundamentals among US physicians, where opiates have been repeatedly embraced, and then vilified. Numerous other practices demonstrating this phenomenon can be cited, including the use of electroconvulsive therapy for depression, and hormone replacement for postmenopausal women. Research funding itself has been subject to pendulum swings, such as occurred during the recent pandemic. Currently, there are a number of similar, very active issues of debate, such as marijuana for widespread medical use, and the employment of hallucinogens for addiction and other mental health disorders. Considerable harm has occurred to some patients when extremes of these pendulum swings have impacted their medical care. It is urged that in practising medicine, physicians consider the entire body of medical evidence accumulated during these pendulum swings, and then have the courage and wisdom to represent the best interests of their patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medico-Legal Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"258172241304558\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medico-Legal Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00258172241304558\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medico-Legal Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00258172241304558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医学是作为一门科学来教授的,但实际上,就像其他受到公众密切关注的领域一样,它往往更像是一门艺术,而不是一门科学。特别是在处理有争议的领域时,医生经常试图采用“护理标准”作为行医指南,并保护自己。然而,护理标准本身往往是一种被动的、临时的结构。许多实践作为公认的病人护理的好例子,已经完全从一个极端转向另一个极端。阿片类药物处方在这个国家的历史是美国医生在实践基础上的彻底转变的例证,在那里,阿片类药物一再被接受,然后又被诋毁。许多其他的实践证明了这一现象,包括使用电休克疗法治疗抑郁症,以及绝经后妇女的激素替代疗法。研究经费本身受到钟摆波动的影响,例如在最近的大流行期间发生的情况。目前,有许多类似的、非常活跃的辩论问题,例如大麻的广泛医疗用途,以及使用致幻剂治疗成瘾和其他精神健康障碍。当这些钟摆的极端摆动影响到他们的医疗护理时,对一些病人造成了相当大的伤害。人们敦促医生在行医时考虑在这些钟摆波动中积累的全部医学证据,然后有勇气和智慧代表病人的最大利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pendulums in medical practice.

Medicine is taught as a science, but in reality, as with other areas that undergo much public scrutiny, it is often more of an art than a science. Particularly when dealing with controversial areas, physicians often attempt to employ the "standard of care" as a guide to practising medicine, and to protect themselves. However, the standard of care itself is often a reactive and temporary construct. A number of practices serve as good examples of accepted patient care that has swung completely from one extreme to another. The history of opiate prescribing in this country exemplifies a complete swing in practice fundamentals among US physicians, where opiates have been repeatedly embraced, and then vilified. Numerous other practices demonstrating this phenomenon can be cited, including the use of electroconvulsive therapy for depression, and hormone replacement for postmenopausal women. Research funding itself has been subject to pendulum swings, such as occurred during the recent pandemic. Currently, there are a number of similar, very active issues of debate, such as marijuana for widespread medical use, and the employment of hallucinogens for addiction and other mental health disorders. Considerable harm has occurred to some patients when extremes of these pendulum swings have impacted their medical care. It is urged that in practising medicine, physicians consider the entire body of medical evidence accumulated during these pendulum swings, and then have the courage and wisdom to represent the best interests of their patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medico-Legal Journal
Medico-Legal Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: The Medico-Legal journal is the official journal of Medico-Legal Society. The Royal Society of Medicine Press is delighted to announce the launch in July 2009 of the Medico-Legal journal, on behalf of the Medico-Legal Society. The Medico-Legal Journal provides an official record of the proceedings of the Medico-Legal Society, and is dedicated to promoting Medico-Legal knowledge in all its aspects. As well as providing a record of activity in the Society, the journal includes a unique collection of contributions and speeches from eminent speakers at society events.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信