解锁心脏洞察:主动脉根部位移计算射血分数在印度急诊科。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Sudhi Manu, Gopinathan Vivek, Asanaru Kunju Sanjan, A Ajay, S Nisarg, Mymbilly Balakrishnan Jayaraj, T R Aishwarya, Mohammad Khalid, S Chetana
{"title":"解锁心脏洞察:主动脉根部位移计算射血分数在印度急诊科。","authors":"Sudhi Manu, Gopinathan Vivek, Asanaru Kunju Sanjan, A Ajay, S Nisarg, Mymbilly Balakrishnan Jayaraj, T R Aishwarya, Mohammad Khalid, S Chetana","doi":"10.5811/westjem.19394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Assessing cardiac function is crucial for managing acute dyspnea. In this study we aimed to evaluate displacement of the aortic root (DAR) as a method for calculating ejection fraction (EF) in patients with undifferentiated dyspnea presenting to the emergency department (ED). The primary objective was to compare EF values obtained through DAR with the modified Simpson method, which is considered the criterion reference, within an Indian academic ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective, cross-sectional study spanning two years (December 2019-December 2021). The study enrolled 110 consecutive ED patients ≥18 years of age, presenting with undifferentiated dyspnea and normal sinus rhythm. Ultrasound-trained investigators measured DAR using M-mode ultrasonography. Experienced echocardiographers, blinded to DAR, determined EF using the modified Simpson method. Statistical analyses included the Shapiro-Wilk test, McNemar test, and the receiver operating characteristic curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean DAR measurement was 0.781 centimeters, with an average calculated EF of 54.4%. The EF calculated using DAR did not differ significantly from EF calculated using the modified Simpson method. Comparative analysis revealed DAR's superior sensitivity (86.21%) compared to mitral annular plane systolic excursion (48.28%) and end-point septal separation (45.45%). The DAR method exhibited high accuracy (area under the curve = 0.958) with a cut-off value 0.706 (sensitivity 88.7%, specificity 93.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evaluating displacement of the aortic root to calculate ejection fraction in undifferentiated dyspnea demonstrated high accuracy, sensitivity, and agreement with the modified Simpson method, which is considered the criterion reference. Its simplicity and non-invasiveness makes it a valuable initial screening tool in emergency settings, with the potential to reshape cardiac assessment approaches and optimize patient care pathways in the ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 2","pages":"191-199"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11931714/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unlocking Cardiac Insights: Displacement of Aortic Root for Calculation of Ejection Fraction in Emergency Department in India.\",\"authors\":\"Sudhi Manu, Gopinathan Vivek, Asanaru Kunju Sanjan, A Ajay, S Nisarg, Mymbilly Balakrishnan Jayaraj, T R Aishwarya, Mohammad Khalid, S Chetana\",\"doi\":\"10.5811/westjem.19394\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Assessing cardiac function is crucial for managing acute dyspnea. In this study we aimed to evaluate displacement of the aortic root (DAR) as a method for calculating ejection fraction (EF) in patients with undifferentiated dyspnea presenting to the emergency department (ED). The primary objective was to compare EF values obtained through DAR with the modified Simpson method, which is considered the criterion reference, within an Indian academic ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective, cross-sectional study spanning two years (December 2019-December 2021). The study enrolled 110 consecutive ED patients ≥18 years of age, presenting with undifferentiated dyspnea and normal sinus rhythm. Ultrasound-trained investigators measured DAR using M-mode ultrasonography. Experienced echocardiographers, blinded to DAR, determined EF using the modified Simpson method. Statistical analyses included the Shapiro-Wilk test, McNemar test, and the receiver operating characteristic curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean DAR measurement was 0.781 centimeters, with an average calculated EF of 54.4%. The EF calculated using DAR did not differ significantly from EF calculated using the modified Simpson method. Comparative analysis revealed DAR's superior sensitivity (86.21%) compared to mitral annular plane systolic excursion (48.28%) and end-point septal separation (45.45%). The DAR method exhibited high accuracy (area under the curve = 0.958) with a cut-off value 0.706 (sensitivity 88.7%, specificity 93.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evaluating displacement of the aortic root to calculate ejection fraction in undifferentiated dyspnea demonstrated high accuracy, sensitivity, and agreement with the modified Simpson method, which is considered the criterion reference. Its simplicity and non-invasiveness makes it a valuable initial screening tool in emergency settings, with the potential to reshape cardiac assessment approaches and optimize patient care pathways in the ED.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"26 2\",\"pages\":\"191-199\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11931714/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.19394\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.19394","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心功能评估对急性呼吸困难的治疗至关重要。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估主动脉根部位移(DAR)作为计算急诊科(ED)未分化呼吸困难患者射血分数(EF)的方法。主要目的是比较通过DAR获得的EF值与在印度学术教育学中被认为是标准参考的改良Simpson方法。方法:我们进行了一项为期两年(2019年12月- 2021年12月)的前瞻性横断面研究。该研究招募了110例年龄≥18岁、表现为未分化呼吸困难和窦性心律正常的ED患者。经过超声训练的研究人员使用m型超声测量DAR。经验丰富的超声心动图医师,盲测DAR,用改良的Simpson法测定EF。统计分析包括Shapiro-Wilk检验、McNemar检验和受试者工作特征曲线。结果:平均DAR测量为0.781 cm,平均计算EF为54.4%。使用DAR计算的EF与使用改进的Simpson方法计算的EF没有显著差异。对比分析显示,DAR的敏感性(86.21%)优于二尖瓣环平面收缩偏移(48.28%)和终点间隔分离(45.45%)。DAR法具有较高的准确度(曲线下面积= 0.958),截断值0.706(灵敏度88.7%,特异性93.1%)。结论:通过评估主动脉根部位移来计算未分化性呼吸困难患者的射血分数具有较高的准确性和敏感性,并且与改进的Simpson方法一致,可作为标准参考。它的简单性和非侵入性使其成为急诊环境中有价值的初始筛查工具,具有重塑心脏评估方法和优化急诊科患者护理途径的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unlocking Cardiac Insights: Displacement of Aortic Root for Calculation of Ejection Fraction in Emergency Department in India.

Introduction: Assessing cardiac function is crucial for managing acute dyspnea. In this study we aimed to evaluate displacement of the aortic root (DAR) as a method for calculating ejection fraction (EF) in patients with undifferentiated dyspnea presenting to the emergency department (ED). The primary objective was to compare EF values obtained through DAR with the modified Simpson method, which is considered the criterion reference, within an Indian academic ED.

Methods: We conducted a prospective, cross-sectional study spanning two years (December 2019-December 2021). The study enrolled 110 consecutive ED patients ≥18 years of age, presenting with undifferentiated dyspnea and normal sinus rhythm. Ultrasound-trained investigators measured DAR using M-mode ultrasonography. Experienced echocardiographers, blinded to DAR, determined EF using the modified Simpson method. Statistical analyses included the Shapiro-Wilk test, McNemar test, and the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results: The mean DAR measurement was 0.781 centimeters, with an average calculated EF of 54.4%. The EF calculated using DAR did not differ significantly from EF calculated using the modified Simpson method. Comparative analysis revealed DAR's superior sensitivity (86.21%) compared to mitral annular plane systolic excursion (48.28%) and end-point septal separation (45.45%). The DAR method exhibited high accuracy (area under the curve = 0.958) with a cut-off value 0.706 (sensitivity 88.7%, specificity 93.1%).

Conclusion: Evaluating displacement of the aortic root to calculate ejection fraction in undifferentiated dyspnea demonstrated high accuracy, sensitivity, and agreement with the modified Simpson method, which is considered the criterion reference. Its simplicity and non-invasiveness makes it a valuable initial screening tool in emergency settings, with the potential to reshape cardiac assessment approaches and optimize patient care pathways in the ED.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信