两种口服甲氨基酚制剂在健康受试者禁食条件下的生物等效性研究:一项随机、开放标签、交叉临床试验。

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Pharmaceuticals Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.3390/ph18030354
Ana Ascaso-Del-Rio, Paola Camargo-Mamani, Inmaculada Gilaberte, Mónica Díez-Hochleitner, Leonor Laredo-Velasco, Teresa Iglesias-Hernangómez, María Rosario Salas-Butrón, Laura Galán Caballero, Iván Alejandro Díaz-Rengifo, Carla Pérez-Ingidua, Emilio Vargas-Castrillón, Antonio Portolés-Pérez
{"title":"两种口服甲氨基酚制剂在健康受试者禁食条件下的生物等效性研究:一项随机、开放标签、交叉临床试验。","authors":"Ana Ascaso-Del-Rio, Paola Camargo-Mamani, Inmaculada Gilaberte, Mónica Díez-Hochleitner, Leonor Laredo-Velasco, Teresa Iglesias-Hernangómez, María Rosario Salas-Butrón, Laura Galán Caballero, Iván Alejandro Díaz-Rengifo, Carla Pérez-Ingidua, Emilio Vargas-Castrillón, Antonio Portolés-Pérez","doi":"10.3390/ph18030354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study aimed to assess the bioequivalence of two oral methocarbamol formulations, as follows: the test (T) methocarbamol 1500 mg tablets and the reference (R) Robaxin<sup>®</sup> 500 mg tablets (3 tablets, total dose: 1500 mg) under fasting conditions, and compare their pharmacokinetic performance. <b>Methods:</b> This was a single-center, phase I, randomized, open-label (blinded for analytical determination), two-sequence, two-period, crossover, bioequivalence study. A total of 32 healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to receive the T-R or R-T administration sequence. Each volunteer received a single dose of each methocarbamol formulation (T or R) separated by a washout period of 7 days. To evaluate the pharmacokinetic profile, blood samples were collected at nineteen time points after dosing. <b>Results:</b> The arithmetic mean C<sub>max</sub> was 31.72 µg/mL for R and 32.39 µg/mL for T, and the arithmetic mean AUC<sub>0-t</sub> was 90.25 h × µg/mL and 89.72 h × µg/mL, respectively. All adverse events reported were mild for both formulations. The 90% confidence intervals for the corresponding logarithmically transformed geometric mean ratios of C<sub>max</sub> and AUC<sub>0-t</sub> fell within the acceptance interval of 80.00-125.00%, as their values were 91.67-112.47% for ln(C<sub>max</sub>) and 92.34-103.47% for ln(AUC<sub>0-t</sub>). <b>Conclusion:</b> Therefore, one tablet of methocarbamol 1500 mg was found to be bioequivalent to the Robaxin<sup>®</sup> 500 mg tablets (3 tablets), with comparable tolerability and safety profiles.</p>","PeriodicalId":20198,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceuticals","volume":"18 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11946590/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bioequivalence Study of Two Oral Methocarbamol Formulations in Healthy Subjects Under Fasting Conditions: A Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Ana Ascaso-Del-Rio, Paola Camargo-Mamani, Inmaculada Gilaberte, Mónica Díez-Hochleitner, Leonor Laredo-Velasco, Teresa Iglesias-Hernangómez, María Rosario Salas-Butrón, Laura Galán Caballero, Iván Alejandro Díaz-Rengifo, Carla Pérez-Ingidua, Emilio Vargas-Castrillón, Antonio Portolés-Pérez\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ph18030354\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study aimed to assess the bioequivalence of two oral methocarbamol formulations, as follows: the test (T) methocarbamol 1500 mg tablets and the reference (R) Robaxin<sup>®</sup> 500 mg tablets (3 tablets, total dose: 1500 mg) under fasting conditions, and compare their pharmacokinetic performance. <b>Methods:</b> This was a single-center, phase I, randomized, open-label (blinded for analytical determination), two-sequence, two-period, crossover, bioequivalence study. A total of 32 healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to receive the T-R or R-T administration sequence. Each volunteer received a single dose of each methocarbamol formulation (T or R) separated by a washout period of 7 days. To evaluate the pharmacokinetic profile, blood samples were collected at nineteen time points after dosing. <b>Results:</b> The arithmetic mean C<sub>max</sub> was 31.72 µg/mL for R and 32.39 µg/mL for T, and the arithmetic mean AUC<sub>0-t</sub> was 90.25 h × µg/mL and 89.72 h × µg/mL, respectively. All adverse events reported were mild for both formulations. The 90% confidence intervals for the corresponding logarithmically transformed geometric mean ratios of C<sub>max</sub> and AUC<sub>0-t</sub> fell within the acceptance interval of 80.00-125.00%, as their values were 91.67-112.47% for ln(C<sub>max</sub>) and 92.34-103.47% for ln(AUC<sub>0-t</sub>). <b>Conclusion:</b> Therefore, one tablet of methocarbamol 1500 mg was found to be bioequivalent to the Robaxin<sup>®</sup> 500 mg tablets (3 tablets), with comparable tolerability and safety profiles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20198,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmaceuticals\",\"volume\":\"18 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11946590/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmaceuticals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18030354\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceuticals","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18030354","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评价两种口服甲氨氨基酚制剂的生物等效性,分别在空腹条件下进行试验(T)甲氨氨基酚1500mg片与对照(R)罗巴新®500mg片(3片,总剂量:1500mg),并比较其药代动力学性能。方法:这是一项单中心、I期、随机、开放标签(分析测定盲法)、两序列、两期、交叉、生物等效性研究。总共32名健康志愿者被随机分配接受T-R或R-T给药顺序。每个志愿者都服用了一剂甲氨氨基酚制剂(T或R),中间间隔7天的洗脱期。为了评估药代动力学特征,在给药后的19个时间点采集血液样本。结果:R和T的算术平均值Cmax分别为31.72µg/mL和32.39µg/mL,算术平均值AUC0-t分别为90.25 h ×µg/mL和89.72 h ×µg/mL。两种制剂报告的所有不良事件都是轻微的。对应的对数变换几何平均比值Cmax和AUC0-t的90%置信区间均在80.00 ~ 125.00%的可接受区间内,ln(Cmax)和ln(AUC0-t)的值分别为91.67 ~ 112.47%和92.34 ~ 103.47%。结论:甲氨甲氨醇1500 mg 1片与罗巴欣500 mg(3片)生物等效,耐受性和安全性相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bioequivalence Study of Two Oral Methocarbamol Formulations in Healthy Subjects Under Fasting Conditions: A Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Clinical Trial.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the bioequivalence of two oral methocarbamol formulations, as follows: the test (T) methocarbamol 1500 mg tablets and the reference (R) Robaxin® 500 mg tablets (3 tablets, total dose: 1500 mg) under fasting conditions, and compare their pharmacokinetic performance. Methods: This was a single-center, phase I, randomized, open-label (blinded for analytical determination), two-sequence, two-period, crossover, bioequivalence study. A total of 32 healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to receive the T-R or R-T administration sequence. Each volunteer received a single dose of each methocarbamol formulation (T or R) separated by a washout period of 7 days. To evaluate the pharmacokinetic profile, blood samples were collected at nineteen time points after dosing. Results: The arithmetic mean Cmax was 31.72 µg/mL for R and 32.39 µg/mL for T, and the arithmetic mean AUC0-t was 90.25 h × µg/mL and 89.72 h × µg/mL, respectively. All adverse events reported were mild for both formulations. The 90% confidence intervals for the corresponding logarithmically transformed geometric mean ratios of Cmax and AUC0-t fell within the acceptance interval of 80.00-125.00%, as their values were 91.67-112.47% for ln(Cmax) and 92.34-103.47% for ln(AUC0-t). Conclusion: Therefore, one tablet of methocarbamol 1500 mg was found to be bioequivalent to the Robaxin® 500 mg tablets (3 tablets), with comparable tolerability and safety profiles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmaceuticals
Pharmaceuticals Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
1332
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmaceuticals (ISSN 1424-8247) is an international scientific journal of medicinal chemistry and related drug sciences.Our aim is to publish updated reviews as well as research articles with comprehensive theoretical and experimental details. Short communications are also accepted; therefore, there is no restriction on the maximum length of the papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信