使用索赔数据增加康复相关健康服务研究方法的透明度和公开性:一个案例。

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Janet K Freburger, Elizabeth R Mormer, Kristin Ressel, Anna M Johnson, Amy M Pastva, Cheryl D Bushnell, Pamela W Duncan, Sara B Jones
{"title":"使用索赔数据增加康复相关健康服务研究方法的透明度和公开性:一个案例。","authors":"Janet K Freburger, Elizabeth R Mormer, Kristin Ressel, Anna M Johnson, Amy M Pastva, Cheryl D Bushnell, Pamela W Duncan, Sara B Jones","doi":"10.1093/ptj/pzaf040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health insurance claims are a rich source of information for health services researchers and can provide evidence to understand issues related to access, efficiency, and effectiveness of care. While numerous studies have examined rehabilitation utilization using Medicare, Medicaid, and/or private insurance claims data, these studies typically lack detail on approaches used to identify rehabilitation services. The primary objectives of this perspective are: (1) to raise awareness of the need for and importance of methodological transparency and openness in rehabilitation-related health services research using claims data and (2) to provide a case example by sharing the details of a method for identifying community-based physical and occupational therapy in Medicare claims. General decisions made in claims-based analyses are discussed and then are illustrated with the approach used for identifying community-based therapy claims within the context of a secondary analysis of data from a large, multicenter pragmatic clinical trial. Specific decisions made and challenges encountered are discussed and recommendations are made for future work in this area. Sharing methodological details, data when possible, and metadata on approaches for conducting rehabilitation-related health services research can enhance its validity, rigor, and-ultimately-overall value. Rehabilitation health services researchers are encouraged to make greater efforts to share information on their methodological approaches using claims data and other data relevant to health services research.</p>","PeriodicalId":20093,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Increasing Methodological Transparency and Openness in Rehabilitation-Related Health Services Research Using Claims Data: A Case Example.\",\"authors\":\"Janet K Freburger, Elizabeth R Mormer, Kristin Ressel, Anna M Johnson, Amy M Pastva, Cheryl D Bushnell, Pamela W Duncan, Sara B Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ptj/pzaf040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Health insurance claims are a rich source of information for health services researchers and can provide evidence to understand issues related to access, efficiency, and effectiveness of care. While numerous studies have examined rehabilitation utilization using Medicare, Medicaid, and/or private insurance claims data, these studies typically lack detail on approaches used to identify rehabilitation services. The primary objectives of this perspective are: (1) to raise awareness of the need for and importance of methodological transparency and openness in rehabilitation-related health services research using claims data and (2) to provide a case example by sharing the details of a method for identifying community-based physical and occupational therapy in Medicare claims. General decisions made in claims-based analyses are discussed and then are illustrated with the approach used for identifying community-based therapy claims within the context of a secondary analysis of data from a large, multicenter pragmatic clinical trial. Specific decisions made and challenges encountered are discussed and recommendations are made for future work in this area. Sharing methodological details, data when possible, and metadata on approaches for conducting rehabilitation-related health services research can enhance its validity, rigor, and-ultimately-overall value. Rehabilitation health services researchers are encouraged to make greater efforts to share information on their methodological approaches using claims data and other data relevant to health services research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzaf040\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzaf040","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

健康保险索赔是卫生服务研究人员的丰富信息来源,可以提供证据,以了解与护理的获取、效率和有效性有关的问题。虽然有许多研究使用医疗保险、医疗补助和/或私人保险索赔数据来检查康复利用情况,但这些研究通常缺乏用于确定康复服务的方法的细节。这一视角的主要目标是:(1)提高人们对使用索赔数据进行康复相关健康服务研究的方法透明度和公开性的必要性和重要性的认识;(2)通过分享一种在医疗保险索赔中识别基于社区的物理和职业治疗方法的细节,提供一个案例。本文讨论了基于索赔的分析中做出的一般决定,然后通过对大型多中心实用临床试验数据的二次分析来说明用于识别基于社区的治疗索赔的方法。讨论了所作的具体决定和遇到的挑战,并对这一领域今后的工作提出了建议。在可能的情况下,共享方法细节、数据和元数据,以开展与康复相关的卫生服务研究,可以提高其有效性、严谨性,并最终提高整体价值。鼓励康复保健服务研究人员作出更大努力,利用索赔数据和与保健服务研究有关的其他数据,分享关于其方法方法的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Increasing Methodological Transparency and Openness in Rehabilitation-Related Health Services Research Using Claims Data: A Case Example.

Health insurance claims are a rich source of information for health services researchers and can provide evidence to understand issues related to access, efficiency, and effectiveness of care. While numerous studies have examined rehabilitation utilization using Medicare, Medicaid, and/or private insurance claims data, these studies typically lack detail on approaches used to identify rehabilitation services. The primary objectives of this perspective are: (1) to raise awareness of the need for and importance of methodological transparency and openness in rehabilitation-related health services research using claims data and (2) to provide a case example by sharing the details of a method for identifying community-based physical and occupational therapy in Medicare claims. General decisions made in claims-based analyses are discussed and then are illustrated with the approach used for identifying community-based therapy claims within the context of a secondary analysis of data from a large, multicenter pragmatic clinical trial. Specific decisions made and challenges encountered are discussed and recommendations are made for future work in this area. Sharing methodological details, data when possible, and metadata on approaches for conducting rehabilitation-related health services research can enhance its validity, rigor, and-ultimately-overall value. Rehabilitation health services researchers are encouraged to make greater efforts to share information on their methodological approaches using claims data and other data relevant to health services research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Therapy
Physical Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Physical Therapy (PTJ) engages and inspires an international readership on topics related to physical therapy. As the leading international journal for research in physical therapy and related fields, PTJ publishes innovative and highly relevant content for both clinicians and scientists and uses a variety of interactive approaches to communicate that content, with the expressed purpose of improving patient care. PTJ"s circulation in 2008 is more than 72,000. Its 2007 impact factor was 2.152. The mean time from submission to first decision is 58 days. Time from acceptance to publication online is less than or equal to 3 months and from acceptance to publication in print is less than or equal to 5 months.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信