M C Wissing, S E I van der Wal, S Bongarts, J Aarnink, K J B Notten, S M J van Kuijk, A H D M Dam, K C P Vissers, K B Kluivers, N van Alfen
{"title":"肌电图和SSEP在慢性盆腔疼痛综合征诊断中的临床价值系统回顾。","authors":"M C Wissing, S E I van der Wal, S Bongarts, J Aarnink, K J B Notten, S M J van Kuijk, A H D M Dam, K C P Vissers, K B Kluivers, N van Alfen","doi":"10.1111/papr.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) is pain in the region of the lower pelvis for three months or longer. Which is often accompanied by complaints of organ systems in the lower abdomen. CPPS is often a subjective diagnosis where electrodiagnostic tests are recommended as a supplement in defining a diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Synthesize the clinical studies that describe electrodiagnostic testing in humans with a clinical diagnosis of CPPS.</p><p><strong>Evidence review: </strong>Registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024510404). A systematic search in Medline/PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of science, from inception till February 2024, complemented with reference examining. Two reviewers independently reviewed titles, abstracts, and full-text papers, and performed data extraction. Reviews were excluded, and papers were included if patients were clinically diagnosed with CPPS and underwent EMG and/or SSEP. The QUADAS-2 tool was used to assess the quality of studies.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Fourteen papers were included concerning EMG and/or SSEP, nine papers reported on EMG and five on SSEP. In total, 432 patients clinically diagnosed with CPPS underwent electrodiagnostic testing. 152/277 patients showed abnormalities on EMG and 102/155 patients had abnormal findings on SSEP. Due to the lack of quantitative data, no meta-analysis could be performed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Abnormalities on electrodiagnostic testing are seen in half of the patients with CPPS, and therefore not recommended as a substitute in the diagnostic process. The low number of patients enrolled in this review needs to be taken into consideration when interpreting the results. Further research on the sensitivity of EMG and/or SSEP in PN is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":19974,"journal":{"name":"Pain Practice","volume":"25 4","pages":"e70028"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11947716/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The clinical value of EMG and SSEP in diagnosing chronic pelvic pain syndrome; a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"M C Wissing, S E I van der Wal, S Bongarts, J Aarnink, K J B Notten, S M J van Kuijk, A H D M Dam, K C P Vissers, K B Kluivers, N van Alfen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/papr.70028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) is pain in the region of the lower pelvis for three months or longer. Which is often accompanied by complaints of organ systems in the lower abdomen. CPPS is often a subjective diagnosis where electrodiagnostic tests are recommended as a supplement in defining a diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Synthesize the clinical studies that describe electrodiagnostic testing in humans with a clinical diagnosis of CPPS.</p><p><strong>Evidence review: </strong>Registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024510404). A systematic search in Medline/PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of science, from inception till February 2024, complemented with reference examining. Two reviewers independently reviewed titles, abstracts, and full-text papers, and performed data extraction. Reviews were excluded, and papers were included if patients were clinically diagnosed with CPPS and underwent EMG and/or SSEP. The QUADAS-2 tool was used to assess the quality of studies.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Fourteen papers were included concerning EMG and/or SSEP, nine papers reported on EMG and five on SSEP. In total, 432 patients clinically diagnosed with CPPS underwent electrodiagnostic testing. 152/277 patients showed abnormalities on EMG and 102/155 patients had abnormal findings on SSEP. Due to the lack of quantitative data, no meta-analysis could be performed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Abnormalities on electrodiagnostic testing are seen in half of the patients with CPPS, and therefore not recommended as a substitute in the diagnostic process. The low number of patients enrolled in this review needs to be taken into consideration when interpreting the results. Further research on the sensitivity of EMG and/or SSEP in PN is recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Practice\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"e70028\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11947716/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.70028\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.70028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:慢性骨盆疼痛综合征(CPPS)是骨盆下部持续3个月或更长时间的疼痛。这通常伴随着下腹部器官系统的不适。CPPS通常是一种主观诊断,建议电诊断测试作为确定诊断的补充。目的:综合描述人类电诊断试验与CPPS临床诊断的临床研究。证据审查:在PROSPERO注册(CRD42024510404)。系统检索Medline/PubMed、Embase、CINAHL和Web of science,检索时间从创立到2024年2月,并辅以参考文献检查。两名审稿人独立审查标题、摘要和全文论文,并进行数据提取。排除综述,纳入临床诊断为CPPS并进行肌电图和/或SSEP的患者的论文。使用QUADAS-2工具评估研究质量。结果:14篇文献涉及肌电图和/或SSEP, 9篇报道肌电图,5篇报道SSEP。共有432例临床诊断为CPPS的患者进行了电诊断试验。277例患者中有152例肌电图异常,155例患者中有102例SSEP异常。由于缺乏定量资料,无法进行meta分析。结论:半数CPPS患者出现电诊断试验异常,因此不推荐作为诊断过程中的替代方法。在解释结果时,需要考虑到本综述纳入的患者数量较少。建议进一步研究肌电图和/或SSEP在PN中的敏感性。
The clinical value of EMG and SSEP in diagnosing chronic pelvic pain syndrome; a systematic review.
Background: Chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) is pain in the region of the lower pelvis for three months or longer. Which is often accompanied by complaints of organ systems in the lower abdomen. CPPS is often a subjective diagnosis where electrodiagnostic tests are recommended as a supplement in defining a diagnosis.
Objective: Synthesize the clinical studies that describe electrodiagnostic testing in humans with a clinical diagnosis of CPPS.
Evidence review: Registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024510404). A systematic search in Medline/PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of science, from inception till February 2024, complemented with reference examining. Two reviewers independently reviewed titles, abstracts, and full-text papers, and performed data extraction. Reviews were excluded, and papers were included if patients were clinically diagnosed with CPPS and underwent EMG and/or SSEP. The QUADAS-2 tool was used to assess the quality of studies.
Findings: Fourteen papers were included concerning EMG and/or SSEP, nine papers reported on EMG and five on SSEP. In total, 432 patients clinically diagnosed with CPPS underwent electrodiagnostic testing. 152/277 patients showed abnormalities on EMG and 102/155 patients had abnormal findings on SSEP. Due to the lack of quantitative data, no meta-analysis could be performed.
Conclusions: Abnormalities on electrodiagnostic testing are seen in half of the patients with CPPS, and therefore not recommended as a substitute in the diagnostic process. The low number of patients enrolled in this review needs to be taken into consideration when interpreting the results. Further research on the sensitivity of EMG and/or SSEP in PN is recommended.
期刊介绍:
Pain Practice, the official journal of the World Institute of Pain, publishes international multidisciplinary articles on pain and analgesia that provide its readership with up-to-date research, evaluation methods, and techniques for pain management. Special sections including the Consultant’s Corner, Images in Pain Practice, Case Studies from Mayo, Tutorials, and the Evidence-Based Medicine combine to give pain researchers, pain clinicians and pain fellows in training a systematic approach to continuing education in pain medicine. Prior to publication, all articles and reviews undergo peer review by at least two experts in the field.