腹腔镜与机器人经腹肾上腺切除术-倾向匹配分析和学习曲线。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
M Meir, A Wiegering, F Sperschneider, A Hendricks, J F Lock, S Flemming, M Kelm, S Hahner, N Schlegel, C T Germer, J Reibetanz
{"title":"腹腔镜与机器人经腹肾上腺切除术-倾向匹配分析和学习曲线。","authors":"M Meir, A Wiegering, F Sperschneider, A Hendricks, J F Lock, S Flemming, M Kelm, S Hahner, N Schlegel, C T Germer, J Reibetanz","doi":"10.1007/s00423-025-03688-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While laparoscopic transabdominal or retroperitoneal adrenalectomy is standard care for adrenal tumors, benefits of robotic adrenalectomy (RA) are yet unclear. We evaluated the costs (including disposables), outcomes as well as the learning curve of robotic and laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) in a specialized center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In retrospective analysis of our prospective database (ethical approval number 88/11) 263 LA were compared to 27 RA in the study period between 2018 and 2023. A propensity score match analysis was used to exclude possible confounders. Furthermore, the learning curve of RA was investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intraoperative Riva Rocci (RR) fluctuations (> 160mmHg, < 90 mmHg), early complications (within 30 days) and intraoperative blood loss were comparable in both groups. However, length of stay was decreased following robotic adrenalectomy (3.50d ± 1.81d compared to 4.61d ± 2.75d; p = 0.04). Due to this, overall costs of RA were lower compared to LA even if cost for disposables were slightly higher in the robotic group. An analysis of the learning curve of robotic adrenalectomy revealed that learning curve is completed after 5- 6th procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Taken together our study supports the fact that RA is as secure and feasible as LA. Furthermore, it might provide advantages due to shorter length of stay, a short learning curve and similar costs compared to LA.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"410 1","pages":"108"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11950101/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laparoscopic vs. Robotic transabdominal adrenalectomy- propensity matched analysis and learning curve.\",\"authors\":\"M Meir, A Wiegering, F Sperschneider, A Hendricks, J F Lock, S Flemming, M Kelm, S Hahner, N Schlegel, C T Germer, J Reibetanz\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00423-025-03688-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While laparoscopic transabdominal or retroperitoneal adrenalectomy is standard care for adrenal tumors, benefits of robotic adrenalectomy (RA) are yet unclear. We evaluated the costs (including disposables), outcomes as well as the learning curve of robotic and laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) in a specialized center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In retrospective analysis of our prospective database (ethical approval number 88/11) 263 LA were compared to 27 RA in the study period between 2018 and 2023. A propensity score match analysis was used to exclude possible confounders. Furthermore, the learning curve of RA was investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intraoperative Riva Rocci (RR) fluctuations (> 160mmHg, < 90 mmHg), early complications (within 30 days) and intraoperative blood loss were comparable in both groups. However, length of stay was decreased following robotic adrenalectomy (3.50d ± 1.81d compared to 4.61d ± 2.75d; p = 0.04). Due to this, overall costs of RA were lower compared to LA even if cost for disposables were slightly higher in the robotic group. An analysis of the learning curve of robotic adrenalectomy revealed that learning curve is completed after 5- 6th procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Taken together our study supports the fact that RA is as secure and feasible as LA. Furthermore, it might provide advantages due to shorter length of stay, a short learning curve and similar costs compared to LA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"410 1\",\"pages\":\"108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11950101/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03688-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03688-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然腹腔镜经腹或腹膜后肾上腺切除术是肾上腺肿瘤的标准治疗,但机器人肾上腺切除术(RA)的益处尚不清楚。我们在一个专门的中心评估了机器人和腹腔镜肾上腺切除术(LA)的成本(包括一次性)、结果以及学习曲线。方法:回顾性分析前瞻性数据库(伦理批准号88/11),比较2018年至2023年研究期间263例RA和27例RA。使用倾向评分匹配分析来排除可能的混杂因素。此外,还研究了RA的学习曲线。结论:综上所述,我们的研究支持RA与LA一样安全可行的事实。此外,与洛杉矶相比,它可能具有更短的停留时间、更短的学习曲线和类似的成本等优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Laparoscopic vs. Robotic transabdominal adrenalectomy- propensity matched analysis and learning curve.

Background: While laparoscopic transabdominal or retroperitoneal adrenalectomy is standard care for adrenal tumors, benefits of robotic adrenalectomy (RA) are yet unclear. We evaluated the costs (including disposables), outcomes as well as the learning curve of robotic and laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) in a specialized center.

Methods: In retrospective analysis of our prospective database (ethical approval number 88/11) 263 LA were compared to 27 RA in the study period between 2018 and 2023. A propensity score match analysis was used to exclude possible confounders. Furthermore, the learning curve of RA was investigated.

Results: Intraoperative Riva Rocci (RR) fluctuations (> 160mmHg, < 90 mmHg), early complications (within 30 days) and intraoperative blood loss were comparable in both groups. However, length of stay was decreased following robotic adrenalectomy (3.50d ± 1.81d compared to 4.61d ± 2.75d; p = 0.04). Due to this, overall costs of RA were lower compared to LA even if cost for disposables were slightly higher in the robotic group. An analysis of the learning curve of robotic adrenalectomy revealed that learning curve is completed after 5- 6th procedure.

Conclusions: Taken together our study supports the fact that RA is as secure and feasible as LA. Furthermore, it might provide advantages due to shorter length of stay, a short learning curve and similar costs compared to LA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信