M Meir, A Wiegering, F Sperschneider, A Hendricks, J F Lock, S Flemming, M Kelm, S Hahner, N Schlegel, C T Germer, J Reibetanz
{"title":"腹腔镜与机器人经腹肾上腺切除术-倾向匹配分析和学习曲线。","authors":"M Meir, A Wiegering, F Sperschneider, A Hendricks, J F Lock, S Flemming, M Kelm, S Hahner, N Schlegel, C T Germer, J Reibetanz","doi":"10.1007/s00423-025-03688-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While laparoscopic transabdominal or retroperitoneal adrenalectomy is standard care for adrenal tumors, benefits of robotic adrenalectomy (RA) are yet unclear. We evaluated the costs (including disposables), outcomes as well as the learning curve of robotic and laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) in a specialized center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In retrospective analysis of our prospective database (ethical approval number 88/11) 263 LA were compared to 27 RA in the study period between 2018 and 2023. A propensity score match analysis was used to exclude possible confounders. Furthermore, the learning curve of RA was investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intraoperative Riva Rocci (RR) fluctuations (> 160mmHg, < 90 mmHg), early complications (within 30 days) and intraoperative blood loss were comparable in both groups. However, length of stay was decreased following robotic adrenalectomy (3.50d ± 1.81d compared to 4.61d ± 2.75d; p = 0.04). Due to this, overall costs of RA were lower compared to LA even if cost for disposables were slightly higher in the robotic group. An analysis of the learning curve of robotic adrenalectomy revealed that learning curve is completed after 5- 6th procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Taken together our study supports the fact that RA is as secure and feasible as LA. Furthermore, it might provide advantages due to shorter length of stay, a short learning curve and similar costs compared to LA.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"410 1","pages":"108"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11950101/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laparoscopic vs. Robotic transabdominal adrenalectomy- propensity matched analysis and learning curve.\",\"authors\":\"M Meir, A Wiegering, F Sperschneider, A Hendricks, J F Lock, S Flemming, M Kelm, S Hahner, N Schlegel, C T Germer, J Reibetanz\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00423-025-03688-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While laparoscopic transabdominal or retroperitoneal adrenalectomy is standard care for adrenal tumors, benefits of robotic adrenalectomy (RA) are yet unclear. We evaluated the costs (including disposables), outcomes as well as the learning curve of robotic and laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) in a specialized center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In retrospective analysis of our prospective database (ethical approval number 88/11) 263 LA were compared to 27 RA in the study period between 2018 and 2023. A propensity score match analysis was used to exclude possible confounders. Furthermore, the learning curve of RA was investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intraoperative Riva Rocci (RR) fluctuations (> 160mmHg, < 90 mmHg), early complications (within 30 days) and intraoperative blood loss were comparable in both groups. However, length of stay was decreased following robotic adrenalectomy (3.50d ± 1.81d compared to 4.61d ± 2.75d; p = 0.04). Due to this, overall costs of RA were lower compared to LA even if cost for disposables were slightly higher in the robotic group. An analysis of the learning curve of robotic adrenalectomy revealed that learning curve is completed after 5- 6th procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Taken together our study supports the fact that RA is as secure and feasible as LA. Furthermore, it might provide advantages due to shorter length of stay, a short learning curve and similar costs compared to LA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"410 1\",\"pages\":\"108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11950101/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03688-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03688-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Laparoscopic vs. Robotic transabdominal adrenalectomy- propensity matched analysis and learning curve.
Background: While laparoscopic transabdominal or retroperitoneal adrenalectomy is standard care for adrenal tumors, benefits of robotic adrenalectomy (RA) are yet unclear. We evaluated the costs (including disposables), outcomes as well as the learning curve of robotic and laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) in a specialized center.
Methods: In retrospective analysis of our prospective database (ethical approval number 88/11) 263 LA were compared to 27 RA in the study period between 2018 and 2023. A propensity score match analysis was used to exclude possible confounders. Furthermore, the learning curve of RA was investigated.
Results: Intraoperative Riva Rocci (RR) fluctuations (> 160mmHg, < 90 mmHg), early complications (within 30 days) and intraoperative blood loss were comparable in both groups. However, length of stay was decreased following robotic adrenalectomy (3.50d ± 1.81d compared to 4.61d ± 2.75d; p = 0.04). Due to this, overall costs of RA were lower compared to LA even if cost for disposables were slightly higher in the robotic group. An analysis of the learning curve of robotic adrenalectomy revealed that learning curve is completed after 5- 6th procedure.
Conclusions: Taken together our study supports the fact that RA is as secure and feasible as LA. Furthermore, it might provide advantages due to shorter length of stay, a short learning curve and similar costs compared to LA.
期刊介绍:
Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.