透析方式在安全网人群中的预后:一项10年回顾性队列研究。

IF 3.2 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Kidney360 Pub Date : 2025-03-27 DOI:10.34067/KID.0000000745
Jiten Patel, Anisha P Ganguly, Huzair Ali, Jaspreet Sian, Jillian Smartt, Michael Harms, Ramesh Saxena, Kavita P Bhavan
{"title":"透析方式在安全网人群中的预后:一项10年回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Jiten Patel, Anisha P Ganguly, Huzair Ali, Jaspreet Sian, Jillian Smartt, Michael Harms, Ramesh Saxena, Kavita P Bhavan","doi":"10.34067/KID.0000000745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In-center hemodialysis (HD) is delivered by dialysis providers, while peritoneal dialysis (PD) involves active patient engagement through self-care. This self-care process may be associated with potential collateral health benefits that can positively impact clinical and patient-centered outcomes. Kidney transplantation (KT) is the primary goal among kidney failure (KF) patients. Several studies have shown that PD patients are more likely to receive KT than HD patients; however, baseline socioeconomic differences may confound differences in receipt of KT. Furthermore, differences in KT among low-income dialysis recipients remain uncharacterized. In this retrospective study, we compared transplant evaluation and listing status among propensity-matched incident HD and PD patients within a large safety-net health system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>150 adult PD patients who initiated at Parkland Health from January 2012 to December 2022 were propensity-matched 1:1 with HD patients based on age, race/ethnicity, language, and co-morbidities. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients evaluated for transplantation. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients listed for transplantation, reasons for not listing, proportion transplanted, time to transplant, hospitalization rates, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Propensity score-matched HD and PD patients had similar age, distribution of gender, race/ethnicity, language preference, co-morbidities, education, and insurance. Among patients initiated on PD, 129 (86.0%) were evaluated for KT, compared to 105 (70.0%) patients on HD (p=0.001). Furthermore, a significantly higher proportion of PD patients than HD patients were ultimately listed for transplantation (51.3% vs. 31.3%, p<0.001). Moreover, 26 (17.3%) HD patients and 33 (22.0%) PD patients underwent KT (p=0.309). The difference in kidney transplant among the two groups was not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this observational study of dialysis patients in a safety-net health system, we observed that more patients on PD were evaluated for transplant than those on HD, leading to higher KT listings of PD patients. These findings suggest that equitable implementation of PD can improve KT evaluation, even among underserved populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":17882,"journal":{"name":"Kidney360","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes by Dialysis Modality in a Safety-Net Population: A 10-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jiten Patel, Anisha P Ganguly, Huzair Ali, Jaspreet Sian, Jillian Smartt, Michael Harms, Ramesh Saxena, Kavita P Bhavan\",\"doi\":\"10.34067/KID.0000000745\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In-center hemodialysis (HD) is delivered by dialysis providers, while peritoneal dialysis (PD) involves active patient engagement through self-care. This self-care process may be associated with potential collateral health benefits that can positively impact clinical and patient-centered outcomes. Kidney transplantation (KT) is the primary goal among kidney failure (KF) patients. Several studies have shown that PD patients are more likely to receive KT than HD patients; however, baseline socioeconomic differences may confound differences in receipt of KT. Furthermore, differences in KT among low-income dialysis recipients remain uncharacterized. In this retrospective study, we compared transplant evaluation and listing status among propensity-matched incident HD and PD patients within a large safety-net health system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>150 adult PD patients who initiated at Parkland Health from January 2012 to December 2022 were propensity-matched 1:1 with HD patients based on age, race/ethnicity, language, and co-morbidities. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients evaluated for transplantation. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients listed for transplantation, reasons for not listing, proportion transplanted, time to transplant, hospitalization rates, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Propensity score-matched HD and PD patients had similar age, distribution of gender, race/ethnicity, language preference, co-morbidities, education, and insurance. Among patients initiated on PD, 129 (86.0%) were evaluated for KT, compared to 105 (70.0%) patients on HD (p=0.001). Furthermore, a significantly higher proportion of PD patients than HD patients were ultimately listed for transplantation (51.3% vs. 31.3%, p<0.001). Moreover, 26 (17.3%) HD patients and 33 (22.0%) PD patients underwent KT (p=0.309). The difference in kidney transplant among the two groups was not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this observational study of dialysis patients in a safety-net health system, we observed that more patients on PD were evaluated for transplant than those on HD, leading to higher KT listings of PD patients. These findings suggest that equitable implementation of PD can improve KT evaluation, even among underserved populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kidney360\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kidney360\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0000000745\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney360","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0000000745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:中心血液透析(HD)由透析提供者提供,而腹膜透析(PD)需要患者通过自我护理积极参与。这种自我护理过程可能与潜在的附带健康益处相关,可以积极影响临床和以患者为中心的结果。肾移植(KT)是肾衰竭(KF)患者的首要目标。多项研究表明,PD患者比HD患者更容易接受KT;然而,基线社会经济差异可能会混淆接受KT的差异。此外,低收入透析受者之间的KT差异仍不明确。在这项回顾性研究中,我们比较了一个大型安全网卫生系统中倾向匹配的HD和PD患者的移植评估和清单状况。方法:2012年1月至2022年12月在Parkland Health开始的150名成年PD患者与HD患者根据年龄、种族/民族、语言和合并症进行1:1的倾向匹配。主要结果是评估移植患者的比例。次要结局包括列入移植名单的患者比例、未列入名单的原因、移植比例、移植时间、住院率和死亡率。结果:倾向评分匹配的HD和PD患者具有相似的年龄、性别分布、种族/民族、语言偏好、合并症、教育程度和保险。在开始接受PD治疗的患者中,129例(86.0%)接受了KT评估,而105例(70.0%)接受了HD治疗(p=0.001)。此外,PD患者最终移植的比例明显高于HD患者(51.3% vs. 31.3%)。结论:在这项对安全网卫生系统中透析患者的观察性研究中,我们观察到PD患者比HD患者更多接受移植评估,导致PD患者的KT列表更高。这些发现表明,即使在服务不足的人群中,公平实施PD也可以改善KT评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes by Dialysis Modality in a Safety-Net Population: A 10-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: In-center hemodialysis (HD) is delivered by dialysis providers, while peritoneal dialysis (PD) involves active patient engagement through self-care. This self-care process may be associated with potential collateral health benefits that can positively impact clinical and patient-centered outcomes. Kidney transplantation (KT) is the primary goal among kidney failure (KF) patients. Several studies have shown that PD patients are more likely to receive KT than HD patients; however, baseline socioeconomic differences may confound differences in receipt of KT. Furthermore, differences in KT among low-income dialysis recipients remain uncharacterized. In this retrospective study, we compared transplant evaluation and listing status among propensity-matched incident HD and PD patients within a large safety-net health system.

Methods: 150 adult PD patients who initiated at Parkland Health from January 2012 to December 2022 were propensity-matched 1:1 with HD patients based on age, race/ethnicity, language, and co-morbidities. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients evaluated for transplantation. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients listed for transplantation, reasons for not listing, proportion transplanted, time to transplant, hospitalization rates, and mortality.

Results: Propensity score-matched HD and PD patients had similar age, distribution of gender, race/ethnicity, language preference, co-morbidities, education, and insurance. Among patients initiated on PD, 129 (86.0%) were evaluated for KT, compared to 105 (70.0%) patients on HD (p=0.001). Furthermore, a significantly higher proportion of PD patients than HD patients were ultimately listed for transplantation (51.3% vs. 31.3%, p<0.001). Moreover, 26 (17.3%) HD patients and 33 (22.0%) PD patients underwent KT (p=0.309). The difference in kidney transplant among the two groups was not significant.

Conclusions: In this observational study of dialysis patients in a safety-net health system, we observed that more patients on PD were evaluated for transplant than those on HD, leading to higher KT listings of PD patients. These findings suggest that equitable implementation of PD can improve KT evaluation, even among underserved populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Kidney360
Kidney360 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信