儿童生长激素缺乏症的长效生长激素。

IF 3 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Journal of the Endocrine Society Pub Date : 2025-03-04 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1210/jendso/bvaf040
Norbert Albers, Sarah Cadarette, Ben Feakins, María Arregui, Stephen Ebohon, Pamela Lai, Subhara Raveendran, Mads Kjelgaard-Hansen, Christine Andersen, Carol Zhao, Alden Smith, Mitchell Geffner
{"title":"儿童生长激素缺乏症的长效生长激素。","authors":"Norbert Albers, Sarah Cadarette, Ben Feakins, María Arregui, Stephen Ebohon, Pamela Lai, Subhara Raveendran, Mads Kjelgaard-Hansen, Christine Andersen, Carol Zhao, Alden Smith, Mitchell Geffner","doi":"10.1210/jendso/bvaf040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Long-acting growth hormone (LAGH) has the potential to improve adherence and outcomes over daily somatropin in growth hormone deficiency (GHD). Whereas daily somatropin products are molecularly identical, LAGHs are molecularly distinct; additional moieties or mechanisms that prolong LAGH action confer unique pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic properties that could affect efficacy and safety. Only one LAGH available in the United States and Europe (lonapegsomatropin) delivers unmodified somatropin. With no head-to-head clinical trials of LAGHs available, this systematic literature review and network meta-analysis were conducted to compare the relative efficacy and safety of LAGHs in pediatric GHD. Five trials were eligible for inclusion in a Bayesian network meta-analysis; 3 contributed to the base case network, including 3 LAGHs (lonapegsomatropin, somapacitan, and somatrogon) and daily somatropin. Treatment with lonapegsomatropin was associated with statistically significantly higher annualized height velocity and change from baseline in height SD score (SDS) at week 52 compared to daily somatropin and somapacitan; no other significant differences in these outcomes were found. The change from baseline in average insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) SDS at week 52 was significantly higher for somatrogon vs all comparators and for lonapegsomatropin vs daily somatropin and somapacitan; average IGF-1 SDS was within normal range in all trials. No significant differences were seen in progression in bone age-to-chronological age ratio or serious adverse events (SAEs). Sensitivity analyses were consistent with the base case. In this network meta-analysis, lonapegsomatropin was the only LAGH associated with better growth outcomes. No significant differences were detected regarding SAEs; other safety outcomes could not be analyzed.</p>","PeriodicalId":17334,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Endocrine Society","volume":"9 5","pages":"bvaf040"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11938432/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Acting Growth Hormone for Pediatric Growth Hormone Deficiency.\",\"authors\":\"Norbert Albers, Sarah Cadarette, Ben Feakins, María Arregui, Stephen Ebohon, Pamela Lai, Subhara Raveendran, Mads Kjelgaard-Hansen, Christine Andersen, Carol Zhao, Alden Smith, Mitchell Geffner\",\"doi\":\"10.1210/jendso/bvaf040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Long-acting growth hormone (LAGH) has the potential to improve adherence and outcomes over daily somatropin in growth hormone deficiency (GHD). Whereas daily somatropin products are molecularly identical, LAGHs are molecularly distinct; additional moieties or mechanisms that prolong LAGH action confer unique pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic properties that could affect efficacy and safety. Only one LAGH available in the United States and Europe (lonapegsomatropin) delivers unmodified somatropin. With no head-to-head clinical trials of LAGHs available, this systematic literature review and network meta-analysis were conducted to compare the relative efficacy and safety of LAGHs in pediatric GHD. Five trials were eligible for inclusion in a Bayesian network meta-analysis; 3 contributed to the base case network, including 3 LAGHs (lonapegsomatropin, somapacitan, and somatrogon) and daily somatropin. Treatment with lonapegsomatropin was associated with statistically significantly higher annualized height velocity and change from baseline in height SD score (SDS) at week 52 compared to daily somatropin and somapacitan; no other significant differences in these outcomes were found. The change from baseline in average insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) SDS at week 52 was significantly higher for somatrogon vs all comparators and for lonapegsomatropin vs daily somatropin and somapacitan; average IGF-1 SDS was within normal range in all trials. No significant differences were seen in progression in bone age-to-chronological age ratio or serious adverse events (SAEs). Sensitivity analyses were consistent with the base case. In this network meta-analysis, lonapegsomatropin was the only LAGH associated with better growth outcomes. No significant differences were detected regarding SAEs; other safety outcomes could not be analyzed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Endocrine Society\",\"volume\":\"9 5\",\"pages\":\"bvaf040\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11938432/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Endocrine Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvaf040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Endocrine Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvaf040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与生长激素缺乏症(GHD)患者每日使用生长激素相比,长效生长激素(LAGH)具有改善依从性和预后的潜力。虽然每天的生长激素产物在分子上是相同的,但lagh在分子上是不同的;延长LAGH作用的其他部分或机制赋予独特的药效学/药代动力学特性,可能影响其疗效和安全性。在美国和欧洲只有一种LAGH (lonapegsomatropin)提供未经修饰的生长激素。由于没有针对LAGHs的正面临床试验,本研究进行了系统的文献综述和网络荟萃分析,以比较LAGHs在儿童GHD中的相对疗效和安全性。5项试验符合纳入贝叶斯网络元分析的条件;3对基本案例网络有贡献,包括3个LAGHs (lonapegsomatropin, somapacitan和somatroon)和每日生长激素。与每日使用生长激素和somapacitan相比,lonapegsomatropin治疗与第52周的年化身高速度和身高SD评分(SDS)基线变化有统计学意义显著相关;在这些结果中没有发现其他显著差异。与基线相比,52周时生长激素的平均胰岛素样生长因子-1 (IGF-1) SDS的变化显著高于所有比较物,lonapegsomatropin的变化显著高于每日生长激素和somapacitan;所有试验的平均IGF-1 SDS均在正常范围内。在骨龄与实足年龄比的进展或严重不良事件(SAEs)方面未见显著差异。敏感性分析与基本情况一致。在这个网络荟萃分析中,lonapegsomatropin是唯一与更好的生长结果相关的LAGH。在SAEs方面未发现显著差异;其他安全结果无法分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-Acting Growth Hormone for Pediatric Growth Hormone Deficiency.

Long-acting growth hormone (LAGH) has the potential to improve adherence and outcomes over daily somatropin in growth hormone deficiency (GHD). Whereas daily somatropin products are molecularly identical, LAGHs are molecularly distinct; additional moieties or mechanisms that prolong LAGH action confer unique pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic properties that could affect efficacy and safety. Only one LAGH available in the United States and Europe (lonapegsomatropin) delivers unmodified somatropin. With no head-to-head clinical trials of LAGHs available, this systematic literature review and network meta-analysis were conducted to compare the relative efficacy and safety of LAGHs in pediatric GHD. Five trials were eligible for inclusion in a Bayesian network meta-analysis; 3 contributed to the base case network, including 3 LAGHs (lonapegsomatropin, somapacitan, and somatrogon) and daily somatropin. Treatment with lonapegsomatropin was associated with statistically significantly higher annualized height velocity and change from baseline in height SD score (SDS) at week 52 compared to daily somatropin and somapacitan; no other significant differences in these outcomes were found. The change from baseline in average insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) SDS at week 52 was significantly higher for somatrogon vs all comparators and for lonapegsomatropin vs daily somatropin and somapacitan; average IGF-1 SDS was within normal range in all trials. No significant differences were seen in progression in bone age-to-chronological age ratio or serious adverse events (SAEs). Sensitivity analyses were consistent with the base case. In this network meta-analysis, lonapegsomatropin was the only LAGH associated with better growth outcomes. No significant differences were detected regarding SAEs; other safety outcomes could not be analyzed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Endocrine Society
Journal of the Endocrine Society Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2039
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信