利用三维计算机断层成像优化S1神经根阻滞:确定理想透视角度并预测S1神经孔位置。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Noritaka Suzuki, Toshiaki Kotani, Shuhei Ohyama, Kotaro Sakashita, Shun Okuwaki, Shuhei Iwata, Yasushi Iijima, Masaya Mizutani, Tsuyoshi Sakuma, Sumihisa Orita, Kazuhide Inage, Yasuhiro Shiga, Masahiro Inoue, Shohei Minami, Seiji Ohtori
{"title":"利用三维计算机断层成像优化S1神经根阻滞:确定理想透视角度并预测S1神经孔位置。","authors":"Noritaka Suzuki, Toshiaki Kotani, Shuhei Ohyama, Kotaro Sakashita, Shun Okuwaki, Shuhei Iwata, Yasushi Iijima, Masaya Mizutani, Tsuyoshi Sakuma, Sumihisa Orita, Kazuhide Inage, Yasuhiro Shiga, Masahiro Inoue, Shohei Minami, Seiji Ohtori","doi":"10.1016/j.jos.2025.02.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>S1 nerve root block (S1NRB) is frequently used to diagnose and treat lumbosacral and lower limb pain. However, the visibility of the S1 neural foramen can be obscured by factors including intestinal gas, increasing the procedure's technical difficulty. This study identified the optimal fluoroscopic angle for S1NRB and standardized the technique using three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) images.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 3D CT images of 101 patients with lumbar degenerative diseases (lumbar disc herniation and lumbar spinal canal stenosis). The reference position angle (RPA) was defined as the angle where the superior endplate of the sacrum appears straight, whereas the tunnel view angle (TVA) was defined as the angle where the anterior and posterior S1 neural foramina coincide. We evaluated the relationship between the RPA and TVA, measured the position of the S1 neural foramen at the RPA using the S1 spinous process and sacroiliac joint as landmarks, and analyzed correlations with sex and body size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean RPA and TVA were 32.4 ± 6.4° and 34.0 ± 6.2°, respectively, with a mean difference of 1.5 ± 2.8° (r = 0.897, p < 0.0001). The horizontal distance from the S1 spinous process to the S1 neural foramen was 23.1 ± 2.1 mm, and to the sacroiliac joint was 52.0 ± 4.3 mm, with a ratio of 44.5 ± 3.4 %. The vertical distance from the S1 spinous process to the S1 neural foramen was -1.2 ± 1.7 mm caudally. In 84.2 % of the cases, the S1 neural foramen was located 0-4 mm caudal to the S1 spinous process and at 40-50 % of the horizontal distance between these landmarks. These parameters showed no significant differences based on sex or body size.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RPA, using the superior endplate of the sacrum as a reference, closely approximates the TVA and is a useful indicator of the optimal fluoroscopic angle for S1NRB. The S1 neural foramen position can be predicted using anatomical landmarks, irrespective of patient characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":16939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing S1 nerve root block using three-dimensional computed tomography imaging: Identifying the ideal fluoroscopic angle and predicting S1 neural foramen position.\",\"authors\":\"Noritaka Suzuki, Toshiaki Kotani, Shuhei Ohyama, Kotaro Sakashita, Shun Okuwaki, Shuhei Iwata, Yasushi Iijima, Masaya Mizutani, Tsuyoshi Sakuma, Sumihisa Orita, Kazuhide Inage, Yasuhiro Shiga, Masahiro Inoue, Shohei Minami, Seiji Ohtori\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jos.2025.02.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>S1 nerve root block (S1NRB) is frequently used to diagnose and treat lumbosacral and lower limb pain. However, the visibility of the S1 neural foramen can be obscured by factors including intestinal gas, increasing the procedure's technical difficulty. This study identified the optimal fluoroscopic angle for S1NRB and standardized the technique using three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) images.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 3D CT images of 101 patients with lumbar degenerative diseases (lumbar disc herniation and lumbar spinal canal stenosis). The reference position angle (RPA) was defined as the angle where the superior endplate of the sacrum appears straight, whereas the tunnel view angle (TVA) was defined as the angle where the anterior and posterior S1 neural foramina coincide. We evaluated the relationship between the RPA and TVA, measured the position of the S1 neural foramen at the RPA using the S1 spinous process and sacroiliac joint as landmarks, and analyzed correlations with sex and body size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean RPA and TVA were 32.4 ± 6.4° and 34.0 ± 6.2°, respectively, with a mean difference of 1.5 ± 2.8° (r = 0.897, p < 0.0001). The horizontal distance from the S1 spinous process to the S1 neural foramen was 23.1 ± 2.1 mm, and to the sacroiliac joint was 52.0 ± 4.3 mm, with a ratio of 44.5 ± 3.4 %. The vertical distance from the S1 spinous process to the S1 neural foramen was -1.2 ± 1.7 mm caudally. In 84.2 % of the cases, the S1 neural foramen was located 0-4 mm caudal to the S1 spinous process and at 40-50 % of the horizontal distance between these landmarks. These parameters showed no significant differences based on sex or body size.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RPA, using the superior endplate of the sacrum as a reference, closely approximates the TVA and is a useful indicator of the optimal fluoroscopic angle for S1NRB. The S1 neural foramen position can be predicted using anatomical landmarks, irrespective of patient characteristics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2025.02.008\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2025.02.008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:S1神经根阻滞(S1NRB)常用于诊断和治疗腰骶和下肢疼痛。然而,S1神经孔的可见性可能被肠道气体等因素遮挡,增加了手术的技术难度。本研究确定了S1NRB的最佳透视角度,并使用三维(3D)计算机断层扫描(CT)图像对技术进行了标准化。方法:对101例腰椎退行性疾病(腰椎间盘突出和腰椎管狭窄)的三维CT图像进行分析。参考位角(RPA)定义为骶骨上终板呈直的角度,而隧道视角(TVA)定义为S1神经孔前后重合的角度。我们评估了RPA和TVA之间的关系,以S1棘突和骶髂关节为标志测量了RPA处S1神经孔的位置,并分析了与性别和体型的相关性。结果:RPA和TVA的平均值分别为32.4±6.4°和34.0±6.2°,平均差为1.5±2.8°(r = 0.897, p)。结论:RPA以骶骨上终板为参照,与TVA非常接近,是S1NRB最佳透视角度的一个有用指标。S1神经孔的位置可以通过解剖标志来预测,而不考虑患者的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimizing S1 nerve root block using three-dimensional computed tomography imaging: Identifying the ideal fluoroscopic angle and predicting S1 neural foramen position.

Background: S1 nerve root block (S1NRB) is frequently used to diagnose and treat lumbosacral and lower limb pain. However, the visibility of the S1 neural foramen can be obscured by factors including intestinal gas, increasing the procedure's technical difficulty. This study identified the optimal fluoroscopic angle for S1NRB and standardized the technique using three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) images.

Methods: We analyzed 3D CT images of 101 patients with lumbar degenerative diseases (lumbar disc herniation and lumbar spinal canal stenosis). The reference position angle (RPA) was defined as the angle where the superior endplate of the sacrum appears straight, whereas the tunnel view angle (TVA) was defined as the angle where the anterior and posterior S1 neural foramina coincide. We evaluated the relationship between the RPA and TVA, measured the position of the S1 neural foramen at the RPA using the S1 spinous process and sacroiliac joint as landmarks, and analyzed correlations with sex and body size.

Results: The mean RPA and TVA were 32.4 ± 6.4° and 34.0 ± 6.2°, respectively, with a mean difference of 1.5 ± 2.8° (r = 0.897, p < 0.0001). The horizontal distance from the S1 spinous process to the S1 neural foramen was 23.1 ± 2.1 mm, and to the sacroiliac joint was 52.0 ± 4.3 mm, with a ratio of 44.5 ± 3.4 %. The vertical distance from the S1 spinous process to the S1 neural foramen was -1.2 ± 1.7 mm caudally. In 84.2 % of the cases, the S1 neural foramen was located 0-4 mm caudal to the S1 spinous process and at 40-50 % of the horizontal distance between these landmarks. These parameters showed no significant differences based on sex or body size.

Conclusions: RPA, using the superior endplate of the sacrum as a reference, closely approximates the TVA and is a useful indicator of the optimal fluoroscopic angle for S1NRB. The S1 neural foramen position can be predicted using anatomical landmarks, irrespective of patient characteristics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Science
Journal of Orthopaedic Science 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Science is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. The journal publishes the latest researches and topical debates in all fields of clinical and experimental orthopaedics, including musculoskeletal medicine, sports medicine, locomotive syndrome, trauma, paediatrics, oncology and biomaterials, as well as basic researches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信