Stephanie K Mueller, Caitlin Kelly, Stephanie Singleton, Luci K Leykum, James D Harrison, Andrew Auerbach, Jeffrey Schnipper
{"title":"开发一种工具来衡量潜在的不适当的医院间转院(IHT):点研究。","authors":"Stephanie K Mueller, Caitlin Kelly, Stephanie Singleton, Luci K Leykum, James D Harrison, Andrew Auerbach, Jeffrey Schnipper","doi":"10.1007/s11606-024-09221-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although inter-hospital transfer (IHT, the transfer of patients between acute care hospitals) aims at matching patients' care needs to appropriate sites of care, IHT practices are variable leaving some patients vulnerable to risks of discontinuity of care without clear benefit. Identifying which patients may not need IHT can help to prevent inappropriate care and improve patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Study overview: </strong>The POINT Study, \"Identification and Prevention of Potentially Inappropriate Inter-Hospital Transfers,\" is a 5-year study (AHRQ-R01HS028621) that aims to define potentially inappropriate IHT using key stakeholder input, evaluate the incidence and patient safety impact of potentially inappropriate IHT across a nationally representative sample of 18 hospitals, and develop an intervention toolkit to reduce potentially inappropriate IHT. In this paper, we report on the development of a standardized adjudication process to capture potentially inappropriate IHT using results generated from the first 2 years of this project.</p><p><strong>Development of the adjudication tool: </strong>Development of the adjudication tool to measure potentially inappropriate IHT involved a multi-step process, including (1) conducting focus groups of key stakeholders involved in IHT to generate a consensus definition of \"potentially inappropriate IHT;\" (2) translating this definition into an adjudication tool for use during retrospective chart review; and (3) conducting rigorous training among all adjudicators to ensure reliability of the adjudication process.</p><p><strong>Next steps: </strong>Next steps include launching sites to conduct adjudications with a goal of 1800 total transfer case adjudications across the 18 sites. We will support the adjudication process with monthly tracking and case review meetings among other supports. The results of this work will lead to a foundational understanding of the prevalence, risk factors, and patient safety impact of potentially inappropriate IHT.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1917-1923"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12119437/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a Tool to Measure Potentially Inappropriate Inter-Hospital Transfer (IHT): The POINT Study.\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie K Mueller, Caitlin Kelly, Stephanie Singleton, Luci K Leykum, James D Harrison, Andrew Auerbach, Jeffrey Schnipper\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11606-024-09221-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although inter-hospital transfer (IHT, the transfer of patients between acute care hospitals) aims at matching patients' care needs to appropriate sites of care, IHT practices are variable leaving some patients vulnerable to risks of discontinuity of care without clear benefit. Identifying which patients may not need IHT can help to prevent inappropriate care and improve patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Study overview: </strong>The POINT Study, \\\"Identification and Prevention of Potentially Inappropriate Inter-Hospital Transfers,\\\" is a 5-year study (AHRQ-R01HS028621) that aims to define potentially inappropriate IHT using key stakeholder input, evaluate the incidence and patient safety impact of potentially inappropriate IHT across a nationally representative sample of 18 hospitals, and develop an intervention toolkit to reduce potentially inappropriate IHT. In this paper, we report on the development of a standardized adjudication process to capture potentially inappropriate IHT using results generated from the first 2 years of this project.</p><p><strong>Development of the adjudication tool: </strong>Development of the adjudication tool to measure potentially inappropriate IHT involved a multi-step process, including (1) conducting focus groups of key stakeholders involved in IHT to generate a consensus definition of \\\"potentially inappropriate IHT;\\\" (2) translating this definition into an adjudication tool for use during retrospective chart review; and (3) conducting rigorous training among all adjudicators to ensure reliability of the adjudication process.</p><p><strong>Next steps: </strong>Next steps include launching sites to conduct adjudications with a goal of 1800 total transfer case adjudications across the 18 sites. We will support the adjudication process with monthly tracking and case review meetings among other supports. The results of this work will lead to a foundational understanding of the prevalence, risk factors, and patient safety impact of potentially inappropriate IHT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1917-1923\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12119437/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-09221-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-09221-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development of a Tool to Measure Potentially Inappropriate Inter-Hospital Transfer (IHT): The POINT Study.
Background: Although inter-hospital transfer (IHT, the transfer of patients between acute care hospitals) aims at matching patients' care needs to appropriate sites of care, IHT practices are variable leaving some patients vulnerable to risks of discontinuity of care without clear benefit. Identifying which patients may not need IHT can help to prevent inappropriate care and improve patient outcomes.
Study overview: The POINT Study, "Identification and Prevention of Potentially Inappropriate Inter-Hospital Transfers," is a 5-year study (AHRQ-R01HS028621) that aims to define potentially inappropriate IHT using key stakeholder input, evaluate the incidence and patient safety impact of potentially inappropriate IHT across a nationally representative sample of 18 hospitals, and develop an intervention toolkit to reduce potentially inappropriate IHT. In this paper, we report on the development of a standardized adjudication process to capture potentially inappropriate IHT using results generated from the first 2 years of this project.
Development of the adjudication tool: Development of the adjudication tool to measure potentially inappropriate IHT involved a multi-step process, including (1) conducting focus groups of key stakeholders involved in IHT to generate a consensus definition of "potentially inappropriate IHT;" (2) translating this definition into an adjudication tool for use during retrospective chart review; and (3) conducting rigorous training among all adjudicators to ensure reliability of the adjudication process.
Next steps: Next steps include launching sites to conduct adjudications with a goal of 1800 total transfer case adjudications across the 18 sites. We will support the adjudication process with monthly tracking and case review meetings among other supports. The results of this work will lead to a foundational understanding of the prevalence, risk factors, and patient safety impact of potentially inappropriate IHT.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.