开发一种工具来衡量潜在的不适当的医院间转院(IHT):点研究。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of General Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-27 DOI:10.1007/s11606-024-09221-8
Stephanie K Mueller, Caitlin Kelly, Stephanie Singleton, Luci K Leykum, James D Harrison, Andrew Auerbach, Jeffrey Schnipper
{"title":"开发一种工具来衡量潜在的不适当的医院间转院(IHT):点研究。","authors":"Stephanie K Mueller, Caitlin Kelly, Stephanie Singleton, Luci K Leykum, James D Harrison, Andrew Auerbach, Jeffrey Schnipper","doi":"10.1007/s11606-024-09221-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although inter-hospital transfer (IHT, the transfer of patients between acute care hospitals) aims at matching patients' care needs to appropriate sites of care, IHT practices are variable leaving some patients vulnerable to risks of discontinuity of care without clear benefit. Identifying which patients may not need IHT can help to prevent inappropriate care and improve patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Study overview: </strong>The POINT Study, \"Identification and Prevention of Potentially Inappropriate Inter-Hospital Transfers,\" is a 5-year study (AHRQ-R01HS028621) that aims to define potentially inappropriate IHT using key stakeholder input, evaluate the incidence and patient safety impact of potentially inappropriate IHT across a nationally representative sample of 18 hospitals, and develop an intervention toolkit to reduce potentially inappropriate IHT. In this paper, we report on the development of a standardized adjudication process to capture potentially inappropriate IHT using results generated from the first 2 years of this project.</p><p><strong>Development of the adjudication tool: </strong>Development of the adjudication tool to measure potentially inappropriate IHT involved a multi-step process, including (1) conducting focus groups of key stakeholders involved in IHT to generate a consensus definition of \"potentially inappropriate IHT;\" (2) translating this definition into an adjudication tool for use during retrospective chart review; and (3) conducting rigorous training among all adjudicators to ensure reliability of the adjudication process.</p><p><strong>Next steps: </strong>Next steps include launching sites to conduct adjudications with a goal of 1800 total transfer case adjudications across the 18 sites. We will support the adjudication process with monthly tracking and case review meetings among other supports. The results of this work will lead to a foundational understanding of the prevalence, risk factors, and patient safety impact of potentially inappropriate IHT.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1917-1923"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12119437/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a Tool to Measure Potentially Inappropriate Inter-Hospital Transfer (IHT): The POINT Study.\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie K Mueller, Caitlin Kelly, Stephanie Singleton, Luci K Leykum, James D Harrison, Andrew Auerbach, Jeffrey Schnipper\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11606-024-09221-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although inter-hospital transfer (IHT, the transfer of patients between acute care hospitals) aims at matching patients' care needs to appropriate sites of care, IHT practices are variable leaving some patients vulnerable to risks of discontinuity of care without clear benefit. Identifying which patients may not need IHT can help to prevent inappropriate care and improve patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Study overview: </strong>The POINT Study, \\\"Identification and Prevention of Potentially Inappropriate Inter-Hospital Transfers,\\\" is a 5-year study (AHRQ-R01HS028621) that aims to define potentially inappropriate IHT using key stakeholder input, evaluate the incidence and patient safety impact of potentially inappropriate IHT across a nationally representative sample of 18 hospitals, and develop an intervention toolkit to reduce potentially inappropriate IHT. In this paper, we report on the development of a standardized adjudication process to capture potentially inappropriate IHT using results generated from the first 2 years of this project.</p><p><strong>Development of the adjudication tool: </strong>Development of the adjudication tool to measure potentially inappropriate IHT involved a multi-step process, including (1) conducting focus groups of key stakeholders involved in IHT to generate a consensus definition of \\\"potentially inappropriate IHT;\\\" (2) translating this definition into an adjudication tool for use during retrospective chart review; and (3) conducting rigorous training among all adjudicators to ensure reliability of the adjudication process.</p><p><strong>Next steps: </strong>Next steps include launching sites to conduct adjudications with a goal of 1800 total transfer case adjudications across the 18 sites. We will support the adjudication process with monthly tracking and case review meetings among other supports. The results of this work will lead to a foundational understanding of the prevalence, risk factors, and patient safety impact of potentially inappropriate IHT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1917-1923\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12119437/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-09221-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-09221-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然医院间转院(IHT,患者在急症医院之间的转院)旨在将患者的护理需求匹配到适当的护理地点,但IHT的做法是可变的,使得一些患者容易受到护理中断的风险,而没有明显的益处。确定哪些患者可能不需要IHT可以帮助预防不适当的护理并改善患者的预后。研究概述:POINT研究,“识别和预防潜在不适当的医院间转院”,是一项为期5年的研究(AHRQ-R01HS028621),旨在利用关键利益相关者的意见来定义潜在不适当的医院间转院,在全国18家医院的代表性样本中评估潜在不适当的医院间转院的发生率和患者安全影响,并开发一个干预工具包来减少潜在不适当的医院间转院。在本文中,我们报告了标准化裁决程序的发展,该程序使用该项目头两年产生的结果来捕获可能不适当的IHT。裁决工具的开发:衡量潜在不适当的国际间侵权行为的裁决工具的开发涉及一个多步骤的过程,包括(1)对涉及国际间侵权行为的主要利益相关者进行焦点小组讨论,以形成“潜在不适当的国际间侵权行为”的共识定义;(2)将这一定义转化为在回顾性图表审查期间使用的裁决工具;(3)对全体评审人员进行严格的培训,确保评审过程的可靠性。下一步:下一步包括启动审判地点,目标是在18个地点进行1800次移交案件裁决。我们将通过每月跟踪和案件审查会议等方式支持裁决程序。这项工作的结果将导致对潜在不适当的IHT的患病率,风险因素和患者安全影响的基本理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of a Tool to Measure Potentially Inappropriate Inter-Hospital Transfer (IHT): The POINT Study.

Background: Although inter-hospital transfer (IHT, the transfer of patients between acute care hospitals) aims at matching patients' care needs to appropriate sites of care, IHT practices are variable leaving some patients vulnerable to risks of discontinuity of care without clear benefit. Identifying which patients may not need IHT can help to prevent inappropriate care and improve patient outcomes.

Study overview: The POINT Study, "Identification and Prevention of Potentially Inappropriate Inter-Hospital Transfers," is a 5-year study (AHRQ-R01HS028621) that aims to define potentially inappropriate IHT using key stakeholder input, evaluate the incidence and patient safety impact of potentially inappropriate IHT across a nationally representative sample of 18 hospitals, and develop an intervention toolkit to reduce potentially inappropriate IHT. In this paper, we report on the development of a standardized adjudication process to capture potentially inappropriate IHT using results generated from the first 2 years of this project.

Development of the adjudication tool: Development of the adjudication tool to measure potentially inappropriate IHT involved a multi-step process, including (1) conducting focus groups of key stakeholders involved in IHT to generate a consensus definition of "potentially inappropriate IHT;" (2) translating this definition into an adjudication tool for use during retrospective chart review; and (3) conducting rigorous training among all adjudicators to ensure reliability of the adjudication process.

Next steps: Next steps include launching sites to conduct adjudications with a goal of 1800 total transfer case adjudications across the 18 sites. We will support the adjudication process with monthly tracking and case review meetings among other supports. The results of this work will lead to a foundational understanding of the prevalence, risk factors, and patient safety impact of potentially inappropriate IHT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信