利用人工智能支持的双能x线成像系统提高胸片图像质量:健康志愿者的观察者偏好研究。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sung-Hyun Yoon, Jihang Kim, Junghoon Kim, Jong-Hyuk Lee, Ilwoong Choi, Choul-Woo Shin, Chang-Min Park
{"title":"利用人工智能支持的双能x线成像系统提高胸片图像质量:健康志愿者的观察者偏好研究。","authors":"Sung-Hyun Yoon, Jihang Kim, Junghoon Kim, Jong-Hyuk Lee, Ilwoong Choi, Choul-Woo Shin, Chang-Min Park","doi":"10.3390/jcm14062091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> To compare the image quality of chest radiography with a dual-energy X-ray imaging system using AI technology (DE-AI) to that of conventional chest radiography with a standard protocol. <b>Methods:</b> In this prospective study, 52 healthy volunteers underwent dual-energy chest radiography. Images were obtained using two exposures at 60 kVp and 120 kVp, separated by a 150 ms interval. Four images were generated for each participant: a conventional image, an enhanced standard image, a soft-tissue-selective image, and a bone-selective image. A machine learning model optimized the cancellation parameters for generating soft-tissue and bone-selective images. To enhance image quality, motion artifacts were minimized using Laplacian pyramid diffeomorphic registration, while a wavelet directional cycle-consistent adversarial network (WavCycleGAN) reduced image noise. Four radiologists independently evaluated the visibility of thirteen anatomical regions (eight soft-tissue regions and five bone regions) and the overall image with a five-point scale of preference. Pooled mean values were calculated for each anatomic region through meta-analysis using a random-effects model. <b>Results:</b> Radiologists preferred DE-AI images to conventional chest radiographs in various anatomic regions. The enhanced standard image showed superior quality in 9 of 13 anatomic regions. Preference for the soft-tissue-selective image was statistically significant for three of eight anatomic regions. Preference for the bone-selective image was statistically significant for four of five anatomic regions. <b>Conclusions:</b> Images produced by DE-AI provide better visualization of thoracic structures.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11942644/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Image Quality of Chest Radiography with Artificial Intelligence-Supported Dual-Energy X-Ray Imaging System: An Observer Preference Study in Healthy Volunteers.\",\"authors\":\"Sung-Hyun Yoon, Jihang Kim, Junghoon Kim, Jong-Hyuk Lee, Ilwoong Choi, Choul-Woo Shin, Chang-Min Park\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jcm14062091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> To compare the image quality of chest radiography with a dual-energy X-ray imaging system using AI technology (DE-AI) to that of conventional chest radiography with a standard protocol. <b>Methods:</b> In this prospective study, 52 healthy volunteers underwent dual-energy chest radiography. Images were obtained using two exposures at 60 kVp and 120 kVp, separated by a 150 ms interval. Four images were generated for each participant: a conventional image, an enhanced standard image, a soft-tissue-selective image, and a bone-selective image. A machine learning model optimized the cancellation parameters for generating soft-tissue and bone-selective images. To enhance image quality, motion artifacts were minimized using Laplacian pyramid diffeomorphic registration, while a wavelet directional cycle-consistent adversarial network (WavCycleGAN) reduced image noise. Four radiologists independently evaluated the visibility of thirteen anatomical regions (eight soft-tissue regions and five bone regions) and the overall image with a five-point scale of preference. Pooled mean values were calculated for each anatomic region through meta-analysis using a random-effects model. <b>Results:</b> Radiologists preferred DE-AI images to conventional chest radiographs in various anatomic regions. The enhanced standard image showed superior quality in 9 of 13 anatomic regions. Preference for the soft-tissue-selective image was statistically significant for three of eight anatomic regions. Preference for the bone-selective image was statistically significant for four of five anatomic regions. <b>Conclusions:</b> Images produced by DE-AI provide better visualization of thoracic structures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11942644/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14062091\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14062091","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:比较采用人工智能技术(DE-AI)的双能x线成像系统胸片图像质量与采用标准方案的常规胸片图像质量。方法:在这项前瞻性研究中,52名健康志愿者接受了双能胸片检查。在60 kVp和120 kVp下两次曝光,间隔150 ms获得图像。为每个参与者生成四张图像:常规图像,增强标准图像,软组织选择性图像和骨骼选择性图像。机器学习模型优化了消去参数,以生成软组织和骨骼选择性图像。为了提高图像质量,使用拉普拉斯金字塔差分配准最小化运动伪像,而小波定向周期一致对抗网络(WavCycleGAN)降低了图像噪声。四名放射科医生独立评估了13个解剖区域(8个软组织区域和5个骨骼区域)和整体图像的可见度,并以5分的偏好等级进行评估。采用随机效应模型进行meta分析,计算各解剖区域的汇总平均值。结果:在不同的解剖区域,放射科医生更喜欢DE-AI图像而不是传统的胸片。增强标准图像显示13个解剖区域中的9个质量较好。对软组织选择性图像的偏好在8个解剖区域中的3个具有统计学意义。对骨选择性图像的偏好在五个解剖区域中的四个具有统计学意义。结论:DE-AI成像能更好地显示胸部结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving Image Quality of Chest Radiography with Artificial Intelligence-Supported Dual-Energy X-Ray Imaging System: An Observer Preference Study in Healthy Volunteers.

Background/Objectives: To compare the image quality of chest radiography with a dual-energy X-ray imaging system using AI technology (DE-AI) to that of conventional chest radiography with a standard protocol. Methods: In this prospective study, 52 healthy volunteers underwent dual-energy chest radiography. Images were obtained using two exposures at 60 kVp and 120 kVp, separated by a 150 ms interval. Four images were generated for each participant: a conventional image, an enhanced standard image, a soft-tissue-selective image, and a bone-selective image. A machine learning model optimized the cancellation parameters for generating soft-tissue and bone-selective images. To enhance image quality, motion artifacts were minimized using Laplacian pyramid diffeomorphic registration, while a wavelet directional cycle-consistent adversarial network (WavCycleGAN) reduced image noise. Four radiologists independently evaluated the visibility of thirteen anatomical regions (eight soft-tissue regions and five bone regions) and the overall image with a five-point scale of preference. Pooled mean values were calculated for each anatomic region through meta-analysis using a random-effects model. Results: Radiologists preferred DE-AI images to conventional chest radiographs in various anatomic regions. The enhanced standard image showed superior quality in 9 of 13 anatomic regions. Preference for the soft-tissue-selective image was statistically significant for three of eight anatomic regions. Preference for the bone-selective image was statistically significant for four of five anatomic regions. Conclusions: Images produced by DE-AI provide better visualization of thoracic structures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信