导航完成癌症治疗激励在马来西亚:患者的见解和实施的挑战。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Nur Hidayati Abdul Halim, Nur Azmiah Zainuddin, Farhana Aminuddin, Nurul Athirah Naserrudin, Nor Zam Azihan Mohd Hassan
{"title":"导航完成癌症治疗激励在马来西亚:患者的见解和实施的挑战。","authors":"Nur Hidayati Abdul Halim, Nur Azmiah Zainuddin, Farhana Aminuddin, Nurul Athirah Naserrudin, Nor Zam Azihan Mohd Hassan","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-12544-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer diagnosis imposes a significant economic burden on healthcare systems, patients, and their families particularly those from low-income households. To mitigate these challenges, Malaysia introduced the completing cancer treatment incentive (CCTI) under the PeKa B40 healthcare scheme to support cancer patients in completing their treatment. This study explores patients' experiences with the CCTI program to provide insights for refining policy interventions and enhancing the program's effectiveness in meeting the needs of its beneficiaries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study examined the experiences of cancer patients with the CCTI program in Malaysia. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 23 respondents, both CCTI recipients and non-applicants, from eight public hospitals. Data were anlaysed using the RE-AIM framework, focusing on the dimensions of reach, adoption, and implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients' awareness of the CCTI varied, with recipients mostly informed through acquaintances, media, or healthcare providers. Non-recipients lacked awareness, with limited information provided by healthcare personnel. While the CCTI was perceived as valuable for alleviating financial burdens, particularly transportation costs, it did not appear to significantly influence treatment-seeking behaviours, as most patients expressed willingness to continue treatment even without financial aid. Implementation challenges included a burdensome application process requiring mandatory health screening, lack of clarity regarding procedures, and inadequate communication about claim approvals. Patients frequently encountered delays and confusion, exacerbated by insufficient support from healthcare providers. Additionally, many were unaware that transport incentives could be claimed for every hospital visit, further limiting the program's usefulness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study highlights critical gaps in the CCTI program's design and delivery, including inadequate communication strategies, complex administrative processes, and a lack of transparency. Addressing these challenges are essential to improve program reach and ensuring equitable access to CCTI. Policymakers should prioritise streamlining application process, enhancing information dissemination, and leveraging digital tools to improve patient experiences. Future studies should assess the program's long-term sustainability and impact on treatment adherence and outcomes. The findings underscore the importance of adopting patient-centred approaches in designing financial aid programs to enhance healthcare equity and access.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"435"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948719/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating the completing cancer treatment incentive in Malaysia: patient insights and implementation challenges.\",\"authors\":\"Nur Hidayati Abdul Halim, Nur Azmiah Zainuddin, Farhana Aminuddin, Nurul Athirah Naserrudin, Nor Zam Azihan Mohd Hassan\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12913-025-12544-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer diagnosis imposes a significant economic burden on healthcare systems, patients, and their families particularly those from low-income households. To mitigate these challenges, Malaysia introduced the completing cancer treatment incentive (CCTI) under the PeKa B40 healthcare scheme to support cancer patients in completing their treatment. This study explores patients' experiences with the CCTI program to provide insights for refining policy interventions and enhancing the program's effectiveness in meeting the needs of its beneficiaries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study examined the experiences of cancer patients with the CCTI program in Malaysia. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 23 respondents, both CCTI recipients and non-applicants, from eight public hospitals. Data were anlaysed using the RE-AIM framework, focusing on the dimensions of reach, adoption, and implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients' awareness of the CCTI varied, with recipients mostly informed through acquaintances, media, or healthcare providers. Non-recipients lacked awareness, with limited information provided by healthcare personnel. While the CCTI was perceived as valuable for alleviating financial burdens, particularly transportation costs, it did not appear to significantly influence treatment-seeking behaviours, as most patients expressed willingness to continue treatment even without financial aid. Implementation challenges included a burdensome application process requiring mandatory health screening, lack of clarity regarding procedures, and inadequate communication about claim approvals. Patients frequently encountered delays and confusion, exacerbated by insufficient support from healthcare providers. Additionally, many were unaware that transport incentives could be claimed for every hospital visit, further limiting the program's usefulness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study highlights critical gaps in the CCTI program's design and delivery, including inadequate communication strategies, complex administrative processes, and a lack of transparency. Addressing these challenges are essential to improve program reach and ensuring equitable access to CCTI. Policymakers should prioritise streamlining application process, enhancing information dissemination, and leveraging digital tools to improve patient experiences. Future studies should assess the program's long-term sustainability and impact on treatment adherence and outcomes. The findings underscore the importance of adopting patient-centred approaches in designing financial aid programs to enhance healthcare equity and access.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"435\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948719/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12544-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12544-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:癌症诊断给医疗保健系统、患者及其家庭,特别是低收入家庭,带来了巨大的经济负担。为了减轻这些挑战,马来西亚在PeKa B40医疗保健计划下引入了完成癌症治疗奖励(CCTI),以支持癌症患者完成治疗。本研究探讨了CCTI项目的患者经验,为完善政策干预和提高项目的有效性提供见解,以满足其受益者的需求。方法:本定性研究考察了马来西亚CCTI项目中癌症患者的经历。对来自八所公立医院的23名受访者进行了半结构化访谈,其中包括CCTI受助人和非申请人。使用RE-AIM框架分析数据,重点关注覆盖、采用和实施的维度。结果:患者对CCTI的认识各不相同,接受者主要通过熟人、媒体或医疗保健提供者获得信息。非接受者缺乏意识,卫生保健人员提供的信息有限。虽然CCTI被认为对减轻经济负担,特别是交通费用有价值,但它似乎并没有显著影响寻求治疗的行为,因为大多数患者表示即使没有经济援助也愿意继续治疗。实施方面的挑战包括繁琐的申请程序,需要进行强制性健康检查,程序不明确,以及关于索赔批准的沟通不足。患者经常遇到延误和困惑,而医疗保健提供者的支持不足又加剧了这种情况。此外,许多人不知道每次去医院都可以获得交通奖励,这进一步限制了该计划的实用性。结论:该研究突出了CCTI项目设计和实施中的关键缺陷,包括沟通策略不足、管理流程复杂以及缺乏透明度。解决这些挑战对于提高项目覆盖面和确保公平获得CCTI服务至关重要。政策制定者应优先考虑简化申请流程,加强信息传播,并利用数字工具改善患者体验。未来的研究应评估该计划的长期可持续性以及对治疗依从性和结果的影响。研究结果强调了在设计财政援助方案时采用以患者为中心的方法以提高医疗公平性和可及性的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Navigating the completing cancer treatment incentive in Malaysia: patient insights and implementation challenges.

Background: Cancer diagnosis imposes a significant economic burden on healthcare systems, patients, and their families particularly those from low-income households. To mitigate these challenges, Malaysia introduced the completing cancer treatment incentive (CCTI) under the PeKa B40 healthcare scheme to support cancer patients in completing their treatment. This study explores patients' experiences with the CCTI program to provide insights for refining policy interventions and enhancing the program's effectiveness in meeting the needs of its beneficiaries.

Methods: This qualitative study examined the experiences of cancer patients with the CCTI program in Malaysia. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 23 respondents, both CCTI recipients and non-applicants, from eight public hospitals. Data were anlaysed using the RE-AIM framework, focusing on the dimensions of reach, adoption, and implementation.

Results: Patients' awareness of the CCTI varied, with recipients mostly informed through acquaintances, media, or healthcare providers. Non-recipients lacked awareness, with limited information provided by healthcare personnel. While the CCTI was perceived as valuable for alleviating financial burdens, particularly transportation costs, it did not appear to significantly influence treatment-seeking behaviours, as most patients expressed willingness to continue treatment even without financial aid. Implementation challenges included a burdensome application process requiring mandatory health screening, lack of clarity regarding procedures, and inadequate communication about claim approvals. Patients frequently encountered delays and confusion, exacerbated by insufficient support from healthcare providers. Additionally, many were unaware that transport incentives could be claimed for every hospital visit, further limiting the program's usefulness.

Conclusions: The study highlights critical gaps in the CCTI program's design and delivery, including inadequate communication strategies, complex administrative processes, and a lack of transparency. Addressing these challenges are essential to improve program reach and ensuring equitable access to CCTI. Policymakers should prioritise streamlining application process, enhancing information dissemination, and leveraging digital tools to improve patient experiences. Future studies should assess the program's long-term sustainability and impact on treatment adherence and outcomes. The findings underscore the importance of adopting patient-centred approaches in designing financial aid programs to enhance healthcare equity and access.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信