长期COVID-19:个性化康复计划的影响

Q3 Medicine
J.C. Perrot , M. Segura , G. Flotats , C. Closa , I. Gich , C. Garcia , A. Alba , M.J. Nadal , A. Pintor , J. Terra , E. Ramirez , M. Beranuy , H. Bascuñana , V. Plaza , M.R. Güell-Rous
{"title":"长期COVID-19:个性化康复计划的影响","authors":"J.C. Perrot ,&nbsp;M. Segura ,&nbsp;G. Flotats ,&nbsp;C. Closa ,&nbsp;I. Gich ,&nbsp;C. Garcia ,&nbsp;A. Alba ,&nbsp;M.J. Nadal ,&nbsp;A. Pintor ,&nbsp;J. Terra ,&nbsp;E. Ramirez ,&nbsp;M. Beranuy ,&nbsp;H. Bascuñana ,&nbsp;V. Plaza ,&nbsp;M.R. Güell-Rous","doi":"10.1016/j.rh.2025.100903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Several guidelines have proposed specific rehabilitation programs to treat symptoms/sequelae in patients with post-acute COVID syndrome (PACS). Only a few studies show that rehabilitation reduce disability after COVID-19.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To describe the response to a personalized rehabilitation program in terms of exercise tolerance, muscle function, dyspnea, quality of life, and frailty state in a cohort of patients with PACS.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Observational prospective cohort study of community-dwelling patients. The rehabilitation program included three modalities (outpatient, home-based, and self-administered), optionally supplemented with respiratory muscle training. Study variables: 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), inspiratory muscle strength (PI<sub>max</sub>), dyspnea, muscle strength (estimated with the Medical Research Council scale and handgrip), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and frailty estimated with the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and at 3- and 6-months following baseline.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 178 patients with PACS, 101 (56.7%) were enrolled in a rehabilitation program: 41.6% home-based, 27.7% outpatient, and 24.8% self-administered. Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) was provided to 56 patients, with 50 included in the rehabilitation program and 6 (5.9%) receiving IMT alone. Significant improvements were observed at 3 months in mMRC strength (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001), SPPB (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.0001), handgrip strength (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.017), mMRC dyspnea, PI<sub>max</sub> (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.0001), and 6-MWD (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.008). Improvements persisted at 6 months for mMRC strength (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.048), SPPB (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.002), PI<sub>max</sub> (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.0001), and 6MWD (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.048). HRQoL mental and physical component scores improved only at 3 months.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Personalized rehabilitation for patients with PACS improved muscle parameters, dyspnoea, and exercise capacity, but not HRQoL, up to 6 months. Improvements in respiratory muscle strength were associated with reductions in dyspnoea and increased exercise capacity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39532,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitacion","volume":"59 2","pages":"Article 100903"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long COVID-19: Impact of a personalized rehabilitation program\",\"authors\":\"J.C. Perrot ,&nbsp;M. Segura ,&nbsp;G. Flotats ,&nbsp;C. Closa ,&nbsp;I. Gich ,&nbsp;C. Garcia ,&nbsp;A. Alba ,&nbsp;M.J. Nadal ,&nbsp;A. Pintor ,&nbsp;J. Terra ,&nbsp;E. Ramirez ,&nbsp;M. Beranuy ,&nbsp;H. Bascuñana ,&nbsp;V. Plaza ,&nbsp;M.R. Güell-Rous\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rh.2025.100903\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Several guidelines have proposed specific rehabilitation programs to treat symptoms/sequelae in patients with post-acute COVID syndrome (PACS). Only a few studies show that rehabilitation reduce disability after COVID-19.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To describe the response to a personalized rehabilitation program in terms of exercise tolerance, muscle function, dyspnea, quality of life, and frailty state in a cohort of patients with PACS.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Observational prospective cohort study of community-dwelling patients. The rehabilitation program included three modalities (outpatient, home-based, and self-administered), optionally supplemented with respiratory muscle training. Study variables: 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), inspiratory muscle strength (PI<sub>max</sub>), dyspnea, muscle strength (estimated with the Medical Research Council scale and handgrip), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and frailty estimated with the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and at 3- and 6-months following baseline.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 178 patients with PACS, 101 (56.7%) were enrolled in a rehabilitation program: 41.6% home-based, 27.7% outpatient, and 24.8% self-administered. Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) was provided to 56 patients, with 50 included in the rehabilitation program and 6 (5.9%) receiving IMT alone. Significant improvements were observed at 3 months in mMRC strength (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001), SPPB (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.0001), handgrip strength (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.017), mMRC dyspnea, PI<sub>max</sub> (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.0001), and 6-MWD (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.008). Improvements persisted at 6 months for mMRC strength (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.048), SPPB (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.002), PI<sub>max</sub> (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.0001), and 6MWD (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.048). HRQoL mental and physical component scores improved only at 3 months.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Personalized rehabilitation for patients with PACS improved muscle parameters, dyspnoea, and exercise capacity, but not HRQoL, up to 6 months. Improvements in respiratory muscle strength were associated with reductions in dyspnoea and increased exercise capacity.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rehabilitacion\",\"volume\":\"59 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100903\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rehabilitacion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048712025000234\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048712025000234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一些指南提出了特定的康复方案来治疗急性后COVID综合征(PACS)患者的症状/后遗症。只有少数研究表明,康复可以减少COVID-19后的残疾。目的描述PACS患者在运动耐量、肌肉功能、呼吸困难、生活质量和虚弱状态方面对个性化康复计划的反应。方法对社区住院患者进行观察性前瞻性队列研究。康复计划包括三种模式(门诊、家庭和自我管理),选择性地辅以呼吸肌训练。研究变量:6分钟步行距离(6MWD)、吸气肌力量(PImax)、呼吸困难、肌肉力量(用医学研究委员会量表和握力评估)、健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)和虚弱程度(用短体能性能测试(SPPB)评估,基线后3个月和6个月。结果178例PACS患者中,101例(56.7%)参加了康复计划,其中41.6%为家庭康复,27.7%为门诊康复,24.8%为自我康复。56例患者接受了吸气肌训练(IMT),其中50例纳入康复计划,6例(5.9%)单独接受了吸气肌训练。3个月时mMRC强度(p = 0.001)、SPPB (p <;0.0001),握力(p = 0.017), mMRC呼吸困难,PImax (p <;0.0001)和6-MWD (p = 0.008)。6个月后mMRC强度(p = 0.048)、SPPB (p = 0.002)、PImax (p <;0.0001), 6MWD (p = 0.048)。HRQoL精神和身体成分评分仅在3个月时改善。结论个性化康复治疗可改善PACS患者6个月前的肌肉参数、呼吸困难和运动能力,但没有改善HRQoL。呼吸肌力量的改善与呼吸困难的减少和运动能力的增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long COVID-19: Impact of a personalized rehabilitation program

Introduction

Several guidelines have proposed specific rehabilitation programs to treat symptoms/sequelae in patients with post-acute COVID syndrome (PACS). Only a few studies show that rehabilitation reduce disability after COVID-19.

Objective

To describe the response to a personalized rehabilitation program in terms of exercise tolerance, muscle function, dyspnea, quality of life, and frailty state in a cohort of patients with PACS.

Methods

Observational prospective cohort study of community-dwelling patients. The rehabilitation program included three modalities (outpatient, home-based, and self-administered), optionally supplemented with respiratory muscle training. Study variables: 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), inspiratory muscle strength (PImax), dyspnea, muscle strength (estimated with the Medical Research Council scale and handgrip), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and frailty estimated with the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and at 3- and 6-months following baseline.

Results

Of 178 patients with PACS, 101 (56.7%) were enrolled in a rehabilitation program: 41.6% home-based, 27.7% outpatient, and 24.8% self-administered. Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) was provided to 56 patients, with 50 included in the rehabilitation program and 6 (5.9%) receiving IMT alone. Significant improvements were observed at 3 months in mMRC strength (p = 0.001), SPPB (p < 0.0001), handgrip strength (p = 0.017), mMRC dyspnea, PImax (p < 0.0001), and 6-MWD (p = 0.008). Improvements persisted at 6 months for mMRC strength (p = 0.048), SPPB (p = 0.002), PImax (p < 0.0001), and 6MWD (p = 0.048). HRQoL mental and physical component scores improved only at 3 months.

Conclusions

Personalized rehabilitation for patients with PACS improved muscle parameters, dyspnoea, and exercise capacity, but not HRQoL, up to 6 months. Improvements in respiratory muscle strength were associated with reductions in dyspnoea and increased exercise capacity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rehabilitacion
Rehabilitacion Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: La revista que es desde hace más de 40 años la publicación oficial de la Sociedad Española de Rehabilitación y referente de la mayoría de las Sociedades de la Especialidad de los países americanos de habla hispana. Se publican 5 números pluritemáticos al año y uno monográfico sobre un tema del mayor interés y actualidad designado por el consejo de redacción.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信