Alessandro Aiuppa , Marcello Bitetto , Luciano Curcio , Dario Delle Donne , João Lages , Giovanni Lo Bue Trisciuzzi , Giancarlo Tamburello , Angelo Vitale , Flavio Cannavò , Mauro Coltelli , Diego Coppola , Lorenzo Innocenti , Laura Insinga , Giorgio Lacanna , Marco Laiolo , Francesco Massimetti , Marco Pistolesi , Eugenio Privitera , Maurizio Ripepe , Marija Voloschina , Giovanna Cilluffo
{"title":"在斯特龙博利大爆炸之前,火山气体的变化在统计上是显著的","authors":"Alessandro Aiuppa , Marcello Bitetto , Luciano Curcio , Dario Delle Donne , João Lages , Giovanni Lo Bue Trisciuzzi , Giancarlo Tamburello , Angelo Vitale , Flavio Cannavò , Mauro Coltelli , Diego Coppola , Lorenzo Innocenti , Laura Insinga , Giorgio Lacanna , Marco Laiolo , Francesco Massimetti , Marco Pistolesi , Eugenio Privitera , Maurizio Ripepe , Marija Voloschina , Giovanna Cilluffo","doi":"10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2025.108325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The generally mild activity of mafic, open-vent volcanoes is punctuated by the periodic occurrence of sudden, larger-than-normal explosive eruptions. Examples of these sudden mafic explosive events are the so-called “major explosions” that occur (2 to 4 times a year on average) at Stromboli volcano in Italy. These relatively small explosions (Volcanic Explosivity Index, VEI < 1) occur without no obvious precursory change in surface activity, and therefore pose a threat to volcanologists/monitoring staff, and to the population in the most severe cases. Past work has found a link between periods of high CO<sub>2</sub>/SO<sub>2</sub> ratios in the volcanic gas plume and the occurrence of such explosions, but this association has never been statistically verified. Here, we report on nearly continuous observations of volcanic gas plume CO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> concentrations and ratios in a diluted plume, as well as SO<sub>2</sub> flux measurements, recorded in a four year (2020 to 2023) activity period of Stromboli volcano, during which 22 such major explosions took place. Using the Conditional Logit model and the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis, we establish a statistical association between the occurrence of major explosions and periods of reduced SO<sub>2</sub> concentrations (very significant) and fluxes, and high CO<sub>2</sub>/SO<sub>2</sub> ratios (significant), in the volcanic plume. These findings are interpreted in light of a simplified conceptual model that explains major explosions as caused by gas bubble accumulation at a rheological discontinuity, resulting from deceleration of the shallow convecting magma that supplies the “regular” Strombolian activity. Using results of statistical analysis, we develop a volcanic gas-based Composite indicator that successfully forecasts (by a-posteriori analysis) 71 % of the events on timescales of week(s). However, we find that this Composite indicator is associated with a large (32 %) False Positive rate and hence low precision (20 %). The significant role of SO₂ concentrations in the model indicates that other factors, such as plume direction and inter-crater variations in gas composition, may need to be taken into account for improving the forecasting performance of the method. Thus, while our results emphasize the importance of gas plume observations in volcano monitoring, they also highlight their current limitations as eruption forecasting tools.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54753,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research","volume":"462 ","pages":"Article 108325"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Volcanic gas changes prior to Stromboli's major explosions are statistically significant\",\"authors\":\"Alessandro Aiuppa , Marcello Bitetto , Luciano Curcio , Dario Delle Donne , João Lages , Giovanni Lo Bue Trisciuzzi , Giancarlo Tamburello , Angelo Vitale , Flavio Cannavò , Mauro Coltelli , Diego Coppola , Lorenzo Innocenti , Laura Insinga , Giorgio Lacanna , Marco Laiolo , Francesco Massimetti , Marco Pistolesi , Eugenio Privitera , Maurizio Ripepe , Marija Voloschina , Giovanna Cilluffo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2025.108325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The generally mild activity of mafic, open-vent volcanoes is punctuated by the periodic occurrence of sudden, larger-than-normal explosive eruptions. Examples of these sudden mafic explosive events are the so-called “major explosions” that occur (2 to 4 times a year on average) at Stromboli volcano in Italy. These relatively small explosions (Volcanic Explosivity Index, VEI < 1) occur without no obvious precursory change in surface activity, and therefore pose a threat to volcanologists/monitoring staff, and to the population in the most severe cases. Past work has found a link between periods of high CO<sub>2</sub>/SO<sub>2</sub> ratios in the volcanic gas plume and the occurrence of such explosions, but this association has never been statistically verified. Here, we report on nearly continuous observations of volcanic gas plume CO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> concentrations and ratios in a diluted plume, as well as SO<sub>2</sub> flux measurements, recorded in a four year (2020 to 2023) activity period of Stromboli volcano, during which 22 such major explosions took place. Using the Conditional Logit model and the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis, we establish a statistical association between the occurrence of major explosions and periods of reduced SO<sub>2</sub> concentrations (very significant) and fluxes, and high CO<sub>2</sub>/SO<sub>2</sub> ratios (significant), in the volcanic plume. These findings are interpreted in light of a simplified conceptual model that explains major explosions as caused by gas bubble accumulation at a rheological discontinuity, resulting from deceleration of the shallow convecting magma that supplies the “regular” Strombolian activity. Using results of statistical analysis, we develop a volcanic gas-based Composite indicator that successfully forecasts (by a-posteriori analysis) 71 % of the events on timescales of week(s). However, we find that this Composite indicator is associated with a large (32 %) False Positive rate and hence low precision (20 %). The significant role of SO₂ concentrations in the model indicates that other factors, such as plume direction and inter-crater variations in gas composition, may need to be taken into account for improving the forecasting performance of the method. Thus, while our results emphasize the importance of gas plume observations in volcano monitoring, they also highlight their current limitations as eruption forecasting tools.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research\",\"volume\":\"462 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108325\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377027325000617\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377027325000617","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Volcanic gas changes prior to Stromboli's major explosions are statistically significant
The generally mild activity of mafic, open-vent volcanoes is punctuated by the periodic occurrence of sudden, larger-than-normal explosive eruptions. Examples of these sudden mafic explosive events are the so-called “major explosions” that occur (2 to 4 times a year on average) at Stromboli volcano in Italy. These relatively small explosions (Volcanic Explosivity Index, VEI < 1) occur without no obvious precursory change in surface activity, and therefore pose a threat to volcanologists/monitoring staff, and to the population in the most severe cases. Past work has found a link between periods of high CO2/SO2 ratios in the volcanic gas plume and the occurrence of such explosions, but this association has never been statistically verified. Here, we report on nearly continuous observations of volcanic gas plume CO2 and SO2 concentrations and ratios in a diluted plume, as well as SO2 flux measurements, recorded in a four year (2020 to 2023) activity period of Stromboli volcano, during which 22 such major explosions took place. Using the Conditional Logit model and the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis, we establish a statistical association between the occurrence of major explosions and periods of reduced SO2 concentrations (very significant) and fluxes, and high CO2/SO2 ratios (significant), in the volcanic plume. These findings are interpreted in light of a simplified conceptual model that explains major explosions as caused by gas bubble accumulation at a rheological discontinuity, resulting from deceleration of the shallow convecting magma that supplies the “regular” Strombolian activity. Using results of statistical analysis, we develop a volcanic gas-based Composite indicator that successfully forecasts (by a-posteriori analysis) 71 % of the events on timescales of week(s). However, we find that this Composite indicator is associated with a large (32 %) False Positive rate and hence low precision (20 %). The significant role of SO₂ concentrations in the model indicates that other factors, such as plume direction and inter-crater variations in gas composition, may need to be taken into account for improving the forecasting performance of the method. Thus, while our results emphasize the importance of gas plume observations in volcano monitoring, they also highlight their current limitations as eruption forecasting tools.
期刊介绍:
An international research journal with focus on volcanic and geothermal processes and their impact on the environment and society.
Submission of papers covering the following aspects of volcanology and geothermal research are encouraged:
(1) Geological aspects of volcanic systems: volcano stratigraphy, structure and tectonic influence; eruptive history; evolution of volcanic landforms; eruption style and progress; dispersal patterns of lava and ash; analysis of real-time eruption observations.
(2) Geochemical and petrological aspects of volcanic rocks: magma genesis and evolution; crystallization; volatile compositions, solubility, and degassing; volcanic petrography and textural analysis.
(3) Hydrology, geochemistry and measurement of volcanic and hydrothermal fluids: volcanic gas emissions; fumaroles and springs; crater lakes; hydrothermal mineralization.
(4) Geophysical aspects of volcanic systems: physical properties of volcanic rocks and magmas; heat flow studies; volcano seismology, geodesy and remote sensing.
(5) Computational modeling and experimental simulation of magmatic and hydrothermal processes: eruption dynamics; magma transport and storage; plume dynamics and ash dispersal; lava flow dynamics; hydrothermal fluid flow; thermodynamics of aqueous fluids and melts.
(6) Volcano hazard and risk research: hazard zonation methodology, development of forecasting tools; assessment techniques for vulnerability and impact.