人工智能和聊天技术中的性别偏见:证据、偏见来源和解决方案

Jerlyn Q.H. Ho , Andree Hartanto , Andrew Koh , Nadyanna M. Majeed
{"title":"人工智能和聊天技术中的性别偏见:证据、偏见来源和解决方案","authors":"Jerlyn Q.H. Ho ,&nbsp;Andree Hartanto ,&nbsp;Andrew Koh ,&nbsp;Nadyanna M. Majeed","doi":"10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The growing adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in various sectors has introduced significant benefits, but also raised concerns over biases, particularly in relation to gender. Despite AI's potential to enhance sectors like healthcare, education, and business, it often mirrors reality and its societal prejudices and can manifest itself through unequal treatment in hiring decisions, academic recommendations, or healthcare diagnostics, systematically disadvantaging women. This paper explores how AI systems and chatbots, notably ChatGPT, can perpetuate gender biases due to inherent flaws in training data, algorithms, and user feedback loops. This problem stems from several sources, including biased training datasets, algorithmic design choices, and human biases. To mitigate these issues, various interventions are discussed, including improving data quality, diversifying datasets and annotator pools, integrating fairness-centric algorithmic approaches, and establishing robust policy frameworks at corporate, national, and international levels. Ultimately, addressing AI bias requires a multi-faceted approach involving researchers, developers, and policymakers to ensure AI systems operate fairly and equitably.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100324,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender biases within Artificial Intelligence and ChatGPT: Evidence, Sources of Biases and Solutions\",\"authors\":\"Jerlyn Q.H. Ho ,&nbsp;Andree Hartanto ,&nbsp;Andrew Koh ,&nbsp;Nadyanna M. Majeed\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The growing adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in various sectors has introduced significant benefits, but also raised concerns over biases, particularly in relation to gender. Despite AI's potential to enhance sectors like healthcare, education, and business, it often mirrors reality and its societal prejudices and can manifest itself through unequal treatment in hiring decisions, academic recommendations, or healthcare diagnostics, systematically disadvantaging women. This paper explores how AI systems and chatbots, notably ChatGPT, can perpetuate gender biases due to inherent flaws in training data, algorithms, and user feedback loops. This problem stems from several sources, including biased training datasets, algorithmic design choices, and human biases. To mitigate these issues, various interventions are discussed, including improving data quality, diversifying datasets and annotator pools, integrating fairness-centric algorithmic approaches, and establishing robust policy frameworks at corporate, national, and international levels. Ultimately, addressing AI bias requires a multi-faceted approach involving researchers, developers, and policymakers to ensure AI systems operate fairly and equitably.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100145\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882125000295\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882125000295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)在各个领域的日益普及带来了巨大的好处,但也引发了对偏见的担忧,尤其是与性别有关的偏见。尽管人工智能有潜力促进医疗、教育和商业等领域的发展,但它往往反映了现实和社会偏见,并可能表现为在招聘决策、学术建议或医疗诊断方面的不平等待遇,系统性地使女性处于不利地位。本文探讨了人工智能系统和聊天机器人,特别是ChatGPT,如何由于训练数据、算法和用户反馈循环中的固有缺陷而使性别偏见永久化。这个问题有几个来源,包括有偏见的训练数据集、算法设计选择和人类偏见。为了缓解这些问题,本文讨论了各种干预措施,包括提高数据质量,使数据集和注释器池多样化,整合以公平为中心的算法方法,以及在企业、国家和国际层面建立健全的政策框架。最终,解决人工智能偏见需要涉及研究人员、开发人员和政策制定者的多方面方法,以确保人工智能系统公平公正地运行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gender biases within Artificial Intelligence and ChatGPT: Evidence, Sources of Biases and Solutions
The growing adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in various sectors has introduced significant benefits, but also raised concerns over biases, particularly in relation to gender. Despite AI's potential to enhance sectors like healthcare, education, and business, it often mirrors reality and its societal prejudices and can manifest itself through unequal treatment in hiring decisions, academic recommendations, or healthcare diagnostics, systematically disadvantaging women. This paper explores how AI systems and chatbots, notably ChatGPT, can perpetuate gender biases due to inherent flaws in training data, algorithms, and user feedback loops. This problem stems from several sources, including biased training datasets, algorithmic design choices, and human biases. To mitigate these issues, various interventions are discussed, including improving data quality, diversifying datasets and annotator pools, integrating fairness-centric algorithmic approaches, and establishing robust policy frameworks at corporate, national, and international levels. Ultimately, addressing AI bias requires a multi-faceted approach involving researchers, developers, and policymakers to ensure AI systems operate fairly and equitably.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信