改进的完整性差距在最大-最小分配,或拓扑在北极

IF 1 2区 数学 Q1 MATHEMATICS
Penny Haxell, Tibor Szabó
{"title":"改进的完整性差距在最大-最小分配,或拓扑在北极","authors":"Penny Haxell, Tibor Szabó","doi":"10.1007/s00493-025-00141-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the max–min allocation problem a set <i>P</i> of players are to be allocated disjoint subsets of a set <i>R</i> of indivisible resources, such that the minimum utility among all players is maximized. We study the restricted variant, also known as the Santa Claus problem, where each resource has an intrinsic positive value, and each player covets a subset of the resources. Bezáková and Dani (SIGecom Exch 5(3):11–18, 2005) showed that this problem is NP-hard to approximate within a factor less than 2, consequently a great deal of work has focused on approximate solutions. The principal approach for obtaining approximation algorithms has been via the Configuration LP (CLP) of Bansal and Sviridenko (Proceedings of the 38th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2006). Accordingly, there has been much interest in bounding the integrality gap of this CLP. The existing algorithms and integrality gap estimations are all based one way or another on the combinatorial augmenting tree argument of Haxell (Graphs Comb 11(3):245–248, 1995) for finding perfect matchings in certain hypergraphs. Our main innovation in this paper is to introduce the use of topological methods, to replace the combinatorial argument of Haxell (Graphs Comb 11(3):245–248, 1995) for the restricted max–min allocation problem. This approach yields substantial improvements in the integrality gap of the CLP. In particular we improve the previously best known bound of 3.808 to 3.534. We also study the <span>\\((1,\\varepsilon )\\)</span>-restricted version, in which resources can take only two values, and improve the integrality gap in most cases. Our approach applies a criterion of Aharoni and Haxell, and Meshulam, for the existence of independent transversals in graphs, which involves the connectedness of the independence complex. This is complemented by a graph process of Meshulam that decreases the connectedness of the independence complex in a controlled fashion and hence, tailored appropriately to the problem, can verify the criterion. In our applications we aim to establish the flexibility of the approach and hence argue for it to be a potential asset in other optimization problems involving hypergraph matchings.</p>","PeriodicalId":50666,"journal":{"name":"Combinatorica","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved Integrality Gap in Max–Min Allocation, or, Topology at the North Pole\",\"authors\":\"Penny Haxell, Tibor Szabó\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00493-025-00141-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In the max–min allocation problem a set <i>P</i> of players are to be allocated disjoint subsets of a set <i>R</i> of indivisible resources, such that the minimum utility among all players is maximized. We study the restricted variant, also known as the Santa Claus problem, where each resource has an intrinsic positive value, and each player covets a subset of the resources. Bezáková and Dani (SIGecom Exch 5(3):11–18, 2005) showed that this problem is NP-hard to approximate within a factor less than 2, consequently a great deal of work has focused on approximate solutions. The principal approach for obtaining approximation algorithms has been via the Configuration LP (CLP) of Bansal and Sviridenko (Proceedings of the 38th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2006). Accordingly, there has been much interest in bounding the integrality gap of this CLP. The existing algorithms and integrality gap estimations are all based one way or another on the combinatorial augmenting tree argument of Haxell (Graphs Comb 11(3):245–248, 1995) for finding perfect matchings in certain hypergraphs. Our main innovation in this paper is to introduce the use of topological methods, to replace the combinatorial argument of Haxell (Graphs Comb 11(3):245–248, 1995) for the restricted max–min allocation problem. This approach yields substantial improvements in the integrality gap of the CLP. In particular we improve the previously best known bound of 3.808 to 3.534. We also study the <span>\\\\((1,\\\\varepsilon )\\\\)</span>-restricted version, in which resources can take only two values, and improve the integrality gap in most cases. Our approach applies a criterion of Aharoni and Haxell, and Meshulam, for the existence of independent transversals in graphs, which involves the connectedness of the independence complex. This is complemented by a graph process of Meshulam that decreases the connectedness of the independence complex in a controlled fashion and hence, tailored appropriately to the problem, can verify the criterion. In our applications we aim to establish the flexibility of the approach and hence argue for it to be a potential asset in other optimization problems involving hypergraph matchings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Combinatorica\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Combinatorica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00493-025-00141-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Combinatorica","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00493-025-00141-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在最大最小分配问题中,P个参与者被分配到R个不可分割资源的不相交子集中,以使所有参与者的最小效用最大化。我们研究了受限变体,也就是所谓的圣诞老人问题,其中每个资源都有一个内在的正价值,每个玩家都觊觎资源的一个子集。Bezáková和Dani (SIGecom Exch 5(3): 11-18, 2005)表明,该问题在小于2的因子内近似是np困难的,因此大量的工作集中在近似解上。获得近似算法的主要方法是通过Bansal和Sviridenko的配置LP (CLP)(第38届ACM计算理论研讨会论文集,2006)。因此,人们对限制该CLP的完整性差距非常感兴趣。现有的寻找超图完美匹配的算法和完整性缺口估计都是基于Haxell (Graphs Comb 11(3): 245-248, 1995)的组合增广树论证。本文的主要创新是引入了拓扑方法的使用,以取代Haxell(图梳11(3):245-248,1995)对限制最大最小分配问题的组合论证。这种方法大大改善了CLP的完整性差距。特别地,我们将之前已知的3.808界改进为3.534。我们还研究了\((1,\varepsilon )\) -restricted版本,其中资源只能取两个值,并在大多数情况下改善了完整性差距。我们的方法应用了Aharoni、Haxell和Meshulam关于图中独立截线存在性的判据,这涉及到独立复合体的连通性。这是由Meshulam的图过程补充的,它以一种受控的方式减少了独立综合体的连通性,因此,根据问题进行适当的调整,可以验证标准。在我们的应用程序中,我们的目标是建立该方法的灵活性,并因此认为它是涉及超图匹配的其他优化问题的潜在资产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improved Integrality Gap in Max–Min Allocation, or, Topology at the North Pole

In the max–min allocation problem a set P of players are to be allocated disjoint subsets of a set R of indivisible resources, such that the minimum utility among all players is maximized. We study the restricted variant, also known as the Santa Claus problem, where each resource has an intrinsic positive value, and each player covets a subset of the resources. Bezáková and Dani (SIGecom Exch 5(3):11–18, 2005) showed that this problem is NP-hard to approximate within a factor less than 2, consequently a great deal of work has focused on approximate solutions. The principal approach for obtaining approximation algorithms has been via the Configuration LP (CLP) of Bansal and Sviridenko (Proceedings of the 38th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2006). Accordingly, there has been much interest in bounding the integrality gap of this CLP. The existing algorithms and integrality gap estimations are all based one way or another on the combinatorial augmenting tree argument of Haxell (Graphs Comb 11(3):245–248, 1995) for finding perfect matchings in certain hypergraphs. Our main innovation in this paper is to introduce the use of topological methods, to replace the combinatorial argument of Haxell (Graphs Comb 11(3):245–248, 1995) for the restricted max–min allocation problem. This approach yields substantial improvements in the integrality gap of the CLP. In particular we improve the previously best known bound of 3.808 to 3.534. We also study the \((1,\varepsilon )\)-restricted version, in which resources can take only two values, and improve the integrality gap in most cases. Our approach applies a criterion of Aharoni and Haxell, and Meshulam, for the existence of independent transversals in graphs, which involves the connectedness of the independence complex. This is complemented by a graph process of Meshulam that decreases the connectedness of the independence complex in a controlled fashion and hence, tailored appropriately to the problem, can verify the criterion. In our applications we aim to establish the flexibility of the approach and hence argue for it to be a potential asset in other optimization problems involving hypergraph matchings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Combinatorica
Combinatorica 数学-数学
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: COMBINATORICA publishes research papers in English in a variety of areas of combinatorics and the theory of computing, with particular emphasis on general techniques and unifying principles. Typical but not exclusive topics covered by COMBINATORICA are - Combinatorial structures (graphs, hypergraphs, matroids, designs, permutation groups). - Combinatorial optimization. - Combinatorial aspects of geometry and number theory. - Algorithms in combinatorics and related fields. - Computational complexity theory. - Randomization and explicit construction in combinatorics and algorithms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信