从“看门人”的见解和经验:一项质性研究探索临床医生的观点提供公共资助产前外显子组测序。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Samantha Dayman, Melissa Graetz, Lisa Hui, Lilian Downie
{"title":"从“看门人”的见解和经验:一项质性研究探索临床医生的观点提供公共资助产前外显子组测序。","authors":"Samantha Dayman, Melissa Graetz, Lisa Hui, Lilian Downie","doi":"10.1111/ajo.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Genomics has improved etiological diagnosis for foetal structural anomalies. It is being increasingly utilised in prenatal investigation both in Australia and internationally. To date, literature reporting diagnostic yield according to indication has been available. There is limited literature around the challenges of implementation and other aspects of utility.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to explore the experiences and perspectives of clinicians involved with the delivery of a state-wide public prenatal exome sequencing (pES) service in Australia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This qualitative study was developed using a pragmatism framework. A multidisciplinary cohort of clinicians across all tertiary foetal medicine units in Victoria was interviewed. Inductive content analysis was used to understand the experiences, impact, and utility of pES.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight clinician interviews were analysed. The impact of pES on clinicians included: increased pressure, higher emotional toll, and balancing the benefits with resource limitations. PES was most useful when it provided prognostic information. The clinicians felt that pES had the most utility for patients when the result informed their decision about whether or not to continue a pregnancy. Clinicians acknowledged their 'gatekeeper' role and valued a collaborative, multidisciplinary approach. The main perceived harm for patients was the anxiety associated with waiting times for results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides insights into the delivery of a publicly funded pES program. Our findings highlight the importance of the multidisciplinary team in the successful implementation of genomic technologies in reproductive health.</p>","PeriodicalId":55429,"journal":{"name":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insights and Experiences From the 'Gatekeepers': A Qualitative Study Exploring Clinician Perspectives on Providing Publicly Funded Prenatal Exome Sequencing.\",\"authors\":\"Samantha Dayman, Melissa Graetz, Lisa Hui, Lilian Downie\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajo.70028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Genomics has improved etiological diagnosis for foetal structural anomalies. It is being increasingly utilised in prenatal investigation both in Australia and internationally. To date, literature reporting diagnostic yield according to indication has been available. There is limited literature around the challenges of implementation and other aspects of utility.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to explore the experiences and perspectives of clinicians involved with the delivery of a state-wide public prenatal exome sequencing (pES) service in Australia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This qualitative study was developed using a pragmatism framework. A multidisciplinary cohort of clinicians across all tertiary foetal medicine units in Victoria was interviewed. Inductive content analysis was used to understand the experiences, impact, and utility of pES.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight clinician interviews were analysed. The impact of pES on clinicians included: increased pressure, higher emotional toll, and balancing the benefits with resource limitations. PES was most useful when it provided prognostic information. The clinicians felt that pES had the most utility for patients when the result informed their decision about whether or not to continue a pregnancy. Clinicians acknowledged their 'gatekeeper' role and valued a collaborative, multidisciplinary approach. The main perceived harm for patients was the anxiety associated with waiting times for results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides insights into the delivery of a publicly funded pES program. Our findings highlight the importance of the multidisciplinary team in the successful implementation of genomic technologies in reproductive health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.70028\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.70028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:基因组学改善了胎儿结构异常的病因学诊断。在澳大利亚和国际上,它越来越多地用于产前调查。迄今为止,文献报道了根据适应症的诊断率。关于实现的挑战和效用的其他方面的文献有限。目的:我们的目的是探讨经验和临床医生参与交付在澳大利亚全国范围内的公共产前外显子组测序(pES)服务的观点。材料和方法:本定性研究采用实用主义框架。对维多利亚州所有三级胎儿医学单位的多学科临床医生进行了采访。采用归纳性内容分析来了解pe的经验、影响和效用。结果:对8位临床医生访谈进行分析。pe对临床医生的影响包括:压力增加,情绪损失增加,以及在资源限制下平衡利益。PES在提供预后信息时最有用。临床医生认为,当结果告知患者是否继续妊娠的决定时,pES对患者最有用。临床医生承认他们的“看门人”角色,并重视合作的多学科方法。患者感受到的主要伤害是与等待结果的时间相关的焦虑。结论:本研究为公共资助的pe项目的实施提供了见解。我们的研究结果强调了多学科团队在生殖健康中成功实施基因组技术的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Insights and Experiences From the 'Gatekeepers': A Qualitative Study Exploring Clinician Perspectives on Providing Publicly Funded Prenatal Exome Sequencing.

Background: Genomics has improved etiological diagnosis for foetal structural anomalies. It is being increasingly utilised in prenatal investigation both in Australia and internationally. To date, literature reporting diagnostic yield according to indication has been available. There is limited literature around the challenges of implementation and other aspects of utility.

Aims: We aimed to explore the experiences and perspectives of clinicians involved with the delivery of a state-wide public prenatal exome sequencing (pES) service in Australia.

Materials and methods: This qualitative study was developed using a pragmatism framework. A multidisciplinary cohort of clinicians across all tertiary foetal medicine units in Victoria was interviewed. Inductive content analysis was used to understand the experiences, impact, and utility of pES.

Results: Eight clinician interviews were analysed. The impact of pES on clinicians included: increased pressure, higher emotional toll, and balancing the benefits with resource limitations. PES was most useful when it provided prognostic information. The clinicians felt that pES had the most utility for patients when the result informed their decision about whether or not to continue a pregnancy. Clinicians acknowledged their 'gatekeeper' role and valued a collaborative, multidisciplinary approach. The main perceived harm for patients was the anxiety associated with waiting times for results.

Conclusions: This study provides insights into the delivery of a publicly funded pES program. Our findings highlight the importance of the multidisciplinary team in the successful implementation of genomic technologies in reproductive health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
165
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (ANZJOG) is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) and the RANZCOG Research foundation. ANZJOG aims to provide a medium for the publication of original contributions to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of obstetrics and gynaecology and related disciplines. Articles are peer reviewed by clinicians or researchers expert in the field of the submitted work. From time to time the journal will also publish printed abstracts from the RANZCOG Annual Scientific Meeting and meetings of relevant special interest groups, where the accepted abstracts have undergone the journals peer review acceptance process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信