Samantha Dayman, Melissa Graetz, Lisa Hui, Lilian Downie
{"title":"从“看门人”的见解和经验:一项质性研究探索临床医生的观点提供公共资助产前外显子组测序。","authors":"Samantha Dayman, Melissa Graetz, Lisa Hui, Lilian Downie","doi":"10.1111/ajo.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Genomics has improved etiological diagnosis for foetal structural anomalies. It is being increasingly utilised in prenatal investigation both in Australia and internationally. To date, literature reporting diagnostic yield according to indication has been available. There is limited literature around the challenges of implementation and other aspects of utility.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to explore the experiences and perspectives of clinicians involved with the delivery of a state-wide public prenatal exome sequencing (pES) service in Australia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This qualitative study was developed using a pragmatism framework. A multidisciplinary cohort of clinicians across all tertiary foetal medicine units in Victoria was interviewed. Inductive content analysis was used to understand the experiences, impact, and utility of pES.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight clinician interviews were analysed. The impact of pES on clinicians included: increased pressure, higher emotional toll, and balancing the benefits with resource limitations. PES was most useful when it provided prognostic information. The clinicians felt that pES had the most utility for patients when the result informed their decision about whether or not to continue a pregnancy. Clinicians acknowledged their 'gatekeeper' role and valued a collaborative, multidisciplinary approach. The main perceived harm for patients was the anxiety associated with waiting times for results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides insights into the delivery of a publicly funded pES program. Our findings highlight the importance of the multidisciplinary team in the successful implementation of genomic technologies in reproductive health.</p>","PeriodicalId":55429,"journal":{"name":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insights and Experiences From the 'Gatekeepers': A Qualitative Study Exploring Clinician Perspectives on Providing Publicly Funded Prenatal Exome Sequencing.\",\"authors\":\"Samantha Dayman, Melissa Graetz, Lisa Hui, Lilian Downie\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajo.70028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Genomics has improved etiological diagnosis for foetal structural anomalies. It is being increasingly utilised in prenatal investigation both in Australia and internationally. To date, literature reporting diagnostic yield according to indication has been available. There is limited literature around the challenges of implementation and other aspects of utility.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to explore the experiences and perspectives of clinicians involved with the delivery of a state-wide public prenatal exome sequencing (pES) service in Australia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This qualitative study was developed using a pragmatism framework. A multidisciplinary cohort of clinicians across all tertiary foetal medicine units in Victoria was interviewed. Inductive content analysis was used to understand the experiences, impact, and utility of pES.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight clinician interviews were analysed. The impact of pES on clinicians included: increased pressure, higher emotional toll, and balancing the benefits with resource limitations. PES was most useful when it provided prognostic information. The clinicians felt that pES had the most utility for patients when the result informed their decision about whether or not to continue a pregnancy. Clinicians acknowledged their 'gatekeeper' role and valued a collaborative, multidisciplinary approach. The main perceived harm for patients was the anxiety associated with waiting times for results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides insights into the delivery of a publicly funded pES program. Our findings highlight the importance of the multidisciplinary team in the successful implementation of genomic technologies in reproductive health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.70028\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.70028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Insights and Experiences From the 'Gatekeepers': A Qualitative Study Exploring Clinician Perspectives on Providing Publicly Funded Prenatal Exome Sequencing.
Background: Genomics has improved etiological diagnosis for foetal structural anomalies. It is being increasingly utilised in prenatal investigation both in Australia and internationally. To date, literature reporting diagnostic yield according to indication has been available. There is limited literature around the challenges of implementation and other aspects of utility.
Aims: We aimed to explore the experiences and perspectives of clinicians involved with the delivery of a state-wide public prenatal exome sequencing (pES) service in Australia.
Materials and methods: This qualitative study was developed using a pragmatism framework. A multidisciplinary cohort of clinicians across all tertiary foetal medicine units in Victoria was interviewed. Inductive content analysis was used to understand the experiences, impact, and utility of pES.
Results: Eight clinician interviews were analysed. The impact of pES on clinicians included: increased pressure, higher emotional toll, and balancing the benefits with resource limitations. PES was most useful when it provided prognostic information. The clinicians felt that pES had the most utility for patients when the result informed their decision about whether or not to continue a pregnancy. Clinicians acknowledged their 'gatekeeper' role and valued a collaborative, multidisciplinary approach. The main perceived harm for patients was the anxiety associated with waiting times for results.
Conclusions: This study provides insights into the delivery of a publicly funded pES program. Our findings highlight the importance of the multidisciplinary team in the successful implementation of genomic technologies in reproductive health.
期刊介绍:
The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (ANZJOG) is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) and the RANZCOG Research foundation. ANZJOG aims to provide a medium for the publication of original contributions to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of obstetrics and gynaecology and related disciplines. Articles are peer reviewed by clinicians or researchers expert in the field of the submitted work. From time to time the journal will also publish printed abstracts from the RANZCOG Annual Scientific Meeting and meetings of relevant special interest groups, where the accepted abstracts have undergone the journals peer review acceptance process.