用基于小波的肌电信号-肌电信号相干性(2 ~ 300 Hz)量化握力收缩方式对肌间协调的影响。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Fuyuan Liao, Liwan Huang, Pu-Chun Mo, Mansoureh Samadi, Nicolas Kelhofer, Tony Tu, Yih-Kuen Jan
{"title":"用基于小波的肌电信号-肌电信号相干性(2 ~ 300 Hz)量化握力收缩方式对肌间协调的影响。","authors":"Fuyuan Liao, Liwan Huang, Pu-Chun Mo, Mansoureh Samadi, Nicolas Kelhofer, Tony Tu, Yih-Kuen Jan","doi":"10.1007/s11517-025-03350-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Handgrip exercise is a common rehabilitation intervention but the effects of contraction modes (isometric and dynamic contractions) on modulating intermuscular coordination have not been investigated. Furthermore, coherence has been assessed at the <math><mi>α</mi></math> , <math><mi>β</mi></math> , <math><mi>γ</mi></math> bands of surface electromyography (EMG) and ignores the frequency over 60 Hz. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of muscle contraction modes on intermuscular coordination using wavelet-based EMG-EMG coherence. Sixteen healthy adults performed isometric handgrip (IHG) at 30% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) for 90 s and dynamic handgrip (DHG) at 30% MVC at a cadence of 1 Hz for 180 s in a random order with a 20-min rest. Two exercise modes have a similar exercise volume. EMG signals were recorded from the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS), extensor carpi radialis (ECR), flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU), and extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) and wavelet coherence of muscle pairs of 4 muscles was computed in seven frequency bands, including 2-5, 8-12, 15-35, 35-60, 60-100, 100-200, and 200-300 Hz. The results showed that IHG and DHG evoked different changes in muscle activation and intermuscular coordination. IHG evoked lower muscle activation compared to DHG. DHG resulted in a significant muscle activation and coherence in 2-5 and 8-12 Hz. IHG resulted in a significant muscle activation and coherence in 15-35, 35-60, and 60-100 Hz compared to DHG. The findings of this study indicate that the mode of handgrip exercise affects the muscle activation and intermuscular coordination between 2 and 300 Hz of EMG signals.</p>","PeriodicalId":49840,"journal":{"name":"Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of handgrip contraction modes on intermuscular coordination quantified by wavelet-based EMG-EMG coherence between 2 and 300 Hz.\",\"authors\":\"Fuyuan Liao, Liwan Huang, Pu-Chun Mo, Mansoureh Samadi, Nicolas Kelhofer, Tony Tu, Yih-Kuen Jan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11517-025-03350-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Handgrip exercise is a common rehabilitation intervention but the effects of contraction modes (isometric and dynamic contractions) on modulating intermuscular coordination have not been investigated. Furthermore, coherence has been assessed at the <math><mi>α</mi></math> , <math><mi>β</mi></math> , <math><mi>γ</mi></math> bands of surface electromyography (EMG) and ignores the frequency over 60 Hz. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of muscle contraction modes on intermuscular coordination using wavelet-based EMG-EMG coherence. Sixteen healthy adults performed isometric handgrip (IHG) at 30% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) for 90 s and dynamic handgrip (DHG) at 30% MVC at a cadence of 1 Hz for 180 s in a random order with a 20-min rest. Two exercise modes have a similar exercise volume. EMG signals were recorded from the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS), extensor carpi radialis (ECR), flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU), and extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) and wavelet coherence of muscle pairs of 4 muscles was computed in seven frequency bands, including 2-5, 8-12, 15-35, 35-60, 60-100, 100-200, and 200-300 Hz. The results showed that IHG and DHG evoked different changes in muscle activation and intermuscular coordination. IHG evoked lower muscle activation compared to DHG. DHG resulted in a significant muscle activation and coherence in 2-5 and 8-12 Hz. IHG resulted in a significant muscle activation and coherence in 15-35, 35-60, and 60-100 Hz compared to DHG. The findings of this study indicate that the mode of handgrip exercise affects the muscle activation and intermuscular coordination between 2 and 300 Hz of EMG signals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49840,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-025-03350-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-025-03350-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

握力训练是一种常见的康复干预措施,但收缩模式(等长收缩和动态收缩)对调节肌间协调的影响尚未得到研究。此外,在表面肌电图(EMG)的α、β、γ波段进行了一致性评估,忽略了频率超过60 Hz的频率。本研究的目的是利用基于小波的肌电图-肌电图相干性来评估肌肉收缩模式对肌间协调的影响。16名健康成人以30%的最大自主收缩率(MVC)进行等长握力(IHG),持续90秒;以30%的最大自主收缩率(MVC)以1 Hz的节奏随机进行动态握力(DHG),持续180秒,休息20分钟。两种运动模式的运动量相近。记录趾浅屈肌(FDS)、桡侧腕伸肌(ECR)、尺侧腕屈肌(FCU)和尺侧腕伸肌(ECU)的肌电信号,计算4块肌肉在2-5、8-12、15-35、35-60、60-100、100-200和200-300 Hz 7个频段的肌对小波相干性。结果表明,IHG和DHG引起的肌肉激活和肌间协调的变化不同。与DHG相比,IHG引起的肌肉激活较低。DHG在2-5 Hz和8-12 Hz时导致显著的肌肉激活和一致性。与DHG相比,IHG在15-35、35-60和60-100 Hz时导致显著的肌肉激活和连贯性。本研究结果表明,握力运动方式对肌电信号2 ~ 300 Hz的肌肉激活和肌间协调有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of handgrip contraction modes on intermuscular coordination quantified by wavelet-based EMG-EMG coherence between 2 and 300 Hz.

Handgrip exercise is a common rehabilitation intervention but the effects of contraction modes (isometric and dynamic contractions) on modulating intermuscular coordination have not been investigated. Furthermore, coherence has been assessed at the α , β , γ bands of surface electromyography (EMG) and ignores the frequency over 60 Hz. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of muscle contraction modes on intermuscular coordination using wavelet-based EMG-EMG coherence. Sixteen healthy adults performed isometric handgrip (IHG) at 30% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) for 90 s and dynamic handgrip (DHG) at 30% MVC at a cadence of 1 Hz for 180 s in a random order with a 20-min rest. Two exercise modes have a similar exercise volume. EMG signals were recorded from the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS), extensor carpi radialis (ECR), flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU), and extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) and wavelet coherence of muscle pairs of 4 muscles was computed in seven frequency bands, including 2-5, 8-12, 15-35, 35-60, 60-100, 100-200, and 200-300 Hz. The results showed that IHG and DHG evoked different changes in muscle activation and intermuscular coordination. IHG evoked lower muscle activation compared to DHG. DHG resulted in a significant muscle activation and coherence in 2-5 and 8-12 Hz. IHG resulted in a significant muscle activation and coherence in 15-35, 35-60, and 60-100 Hz compared to DHG. The findings of this study indicate that the mode of handgrip exercise affects the muscle activation and intermuscular coordination between 2 and 300 Hz of EMG signals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
249
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1963, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing (MBEC) continues to serve the biomedical engineering community, covering the entire spectrum of biomedical and clinical engineering. The journal presents exciting and vital experimental and theoretical developments in biomedical science and technology, and reports on advances in computer-based methodologies in these multidisciplinary subjects. The journal also incorporates new and evolving technologies including cellular engineering and molecular imaging. MBEC publishes original research articles as well as reviews and technical notes. Its Rapid Communications category focuses on material of immediate value to the readership, while the Controversies section provides a forum to exchange views on selected issues, stimulating a vigorous and informed debate in this exciting and high profile field. MBEC is an official journal of the International Federation of Medical and Biological Engineering (IFMBE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信