不同体重指数无标准可改变心血管危险因素的急性心肌梗死患者的住院结局:来自cc - acs项目的发现

IF 5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of the American Heart Association Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-26 DOI:10.1161/JAHA.124.037651
Yuxiu Yang, Zaiqiang Liu, Fei Gao, Xiaoteng Ma, Jing Liu, Zhijian Wang
{"title":"不同体重指数无标准可改变心血管危险因素的急性心肌梗死患者的住院结局:来自cc - acs项目的发现","authors":"Yuxiu Yang, Zaiqiang Liu, Fei Gao, Xiaoteng Ma, Jing Liu, Zhijian Wang","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.124.037651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals who present with acute myocardial infarction in the absence of standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (ie, SMuRF-less) seem to have a significantly increased risk of mortality; however, it remains unclear whether the \"SMuRF paradox\" would be influenced by patients' baseline body mass index (BMI) status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the CCC-ACS (Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-Acute Coronary Syndrome) project from November 2014 to July 2019, we analyzed patients with acute myocardial infarction with and without SMuRFs and categorized their BMI as underweight (<18.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), normal weight (18.5-24 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), overweight (24-28 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), and obese (>28 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). The primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate BMI-stratified associations between SMuRF-less status and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 44 538 patients with first-presentation acute myocardial infarction, of whom 4454 were SMuRF-less. The incidence of SMuRF-lessness declined from 16.2% to 6.5% as BMI increased by category, and it prevailed more frequently among women and older people regardless of their BMI status. Patients who were SMuRF-less had a significant increase in in-hospital mortality than patients with ≥1 SMuRF (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.750 [95% CI, 1.057-2.896], <i>P</i><0.001). The highest mortality rate was observed in the group who were SMuRF-less and underweight (3.5%). Considering patients with ≥1 SMuRF and obesity as the reference group, the group who were SMuRF-less underweight exhibited the highest increase in mortality (adjusted OR, 3.854 [95% CI, 2.130-6.973], <i>P</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients with first-presentation acute myocardial infarction, compared with those with ≥1 SMuRF, patients who were SMuRF-less have a significantly higher risk of in-hospital mortality, especially in those underweight, whereas in-hospital survival was the most favorable among patients with ≥1 SMuRF and obesity.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT0230661.</p>","PeriodicalId":54370,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":" ","pages":"e037651"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In-Hospital Outcomes in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and No Standard Modifiable Cardiovascular Risk Factors Across Varying Body Mass Index: Findings From the CCC-ACS Project.\",\"authors\":\"Yuxiu Yang, Zaiqiang Liu, Fei Gao, Xiaoteng Ma, Jing Liu, Zhijian Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/JAHA.124.037651\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals who present with acute myocardial infarction in the absence of standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (ie, SMuRF-less) seem to have a significantly increased risk of mortality; however, it remains unclear whether the \\\"SMuRF paradox\\\" would be influenced by patients' baseline body mass index (BMI) status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the CCC-ACS (Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-Acute Coronary Syndrome) project from November 2014 to July 2019, we analyzed patients with acute myocardial infarction with and without SMuRFs and categorized their BMI as underweight (<18.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), normal weight (18.5-24 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), overweight (24-28 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), and obese (>28 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). The primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate BMI-stratified associations between SMuRF-less status and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 44 538 patients with first-presentation acute myocardial infarction, of whom 4454 were SMuRF-less. The incidence of SMuRF-lessness declined from 16.2% to 6.5% as BMI increased by category, and it prevailed more frequently among women and older people regardless of their BMI status. Patients who were SMuRF-less had a significant increase in in-hospital mortality than patients with ≥1 SMuRF (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.750 [95% CI, 1.057-2.896], <i>P</i><0.001). The highest mortality rate was observed in the group who were SMuRF-less and underweight (3.5%). Considering patients with ≥1 SMuRF and obesity as the reference group, the group who were SMuRF-less underweight exhibited the highest increase in mortality (adjusted OR, 3.854 [95% CI, 2.130-6.973], <i>P</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients with first-presentation acute myocardial infarction, compared with those with ≥1 SMuRF, patients who were SMuRF-less have a significantly higher risk of in-hospital mortality, especially in those underweight, whereas in-hospital survival was the most favorable among patients with ≥1 SMuRF and obesity.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT0230661.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Heart Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e037651\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Heart Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.124.037651\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.124.037651","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在没有标准可改变的心血管危险因素(即smurf较少)的情况下出现急性心肌梗死的个体似乎具有显著增加的死亡风险;然而,尚不清楚“SMuRF悖论”是否会受到患者基线体重指数(BMI)状态的影响。方法:利用2014年11月至2019年7月CCC-ACS(改善心血管疾病在中国急性冠状动脉综合征的护理)项目的数据,对伴有和不伴有smurf的急性心肌梗死患者进行分析,并将其BMI分为体重不足(2)、正常体重(18.5-24 kg/m2)、超重(24-28 kg/m2)和肥胖(bb0 -28 kg/m2)。主要终点是院内全因死亡率。使用多变量逻辑回归模型来估计SMuRF-less状态与结果之间的bmi分层关联。结果:该研究纳入了44538例首发急性心肌梗死患者,其中4454例smurf缺失。随着BMI的增加,smurf缺失的发生率从16.2%下降到6.5%,并且在女性和老年人中更常见,无论他们的BMI状况如何。与SMuRF≥1的患者相比,SMuRF较少的患者住院死亡率显著增加(校正优势比[OR], 1.750 [95% CI, 1.057-2.896], ppp)。结论:在首发急性心肌梗死患者中,与SMuRF≥1的患者相比,SMuRF较少的患者住院死亡率风险明显更高,尤其是体重过轻的患者,而SMuRF≥1和肥胖患者的住院生存率最有利。注册:网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT0230661。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In-Hospital Outcomes in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and No Standard Modifiable Cardiovascular Risk Factors Across Varying Body Mass Index: Findings From the CCC-ACS Project.

Background: Individuals who present with acute myocardial infarction in the absence of standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (ie, SMuRF-less) seem to have a significantly increased risk of mortality; however, it remains unclear whether the "SMuRF paradox" would be influenced by patients' baseline body mass index (BMI) status.

Methods: Using data from the CCC-ACS (Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-Acute Coronary Syndrome) project from November 2014 to July 2019, we analyzed patients with acute myocardial infarction with and without SMuRFs and categorized their BMI as underweight (<18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (18.5-24 kg/m2), overweight (24-28 kg/m2), and obese (>28 kg/m2). The primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate BMI-stratified associations between SMuRF-less status and outcomes.

Results: The study included 44 538 patients with first-presentation acute myocardial infarction, of whom 4454 were SMuRF-less. The incidence of SMuRF-lessness declined from 16.2% to 6.5% as BMI increased by category, and it prevailed more frequently among women and older people regardless of their BMI status. Patients who were SMuRF-less had a significant increase in in-hospital mortality than patients with ≥1 SMuRF (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.750 [95% CI, 1.057-2.896], P<0.001). The highest mortality rate was observed in the group who were SMuRF-less and underweight (3.5%). Considering patients with ≥1 SMuRF and obesity as the reference group, the group who were SMuRF-less underweight exhibited the highest increase in mortality (adjusted OR, 3.854 [95% CI, 2.130-6.973], P<0.001).

Conclusions: Among patients with first-presentation acute myocardial infarction, compared with those with ≥1 SMuRF, patients who were SMuRF-less have a significantly higher risk of in-hospital mortality, especially in those underweight, whereas in-hospital survival was the most favorable among patients with ≥1 SMuRF and obesity.

Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT0230661.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Heart Association
Journal of the American Heart Association CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
1749
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: As an Open Access journal, JAHA - Journal of the American Heart Association is rapidly and freely available, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice. JAHA is an authoritative, peer-reviewed Open Access journal focusing on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. JAHA provides a global forum for basic and clinical research and timely reviews on cardiovascular disease and stroke. As an Open Access journal, its content is free on publication to read, download, and share, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信