Yannick Rösner, Lennard-Luca Brüning, Andreas Neff
{"title":"提供额外的关节镜视频材料是否可以提高牙科非专家对颞下颌关节疾病评估的准确性，而不是单独的MRI：一项针对3至5年级德国牙科学生的探索性研究。","authors":"Yannick Rösner, Lennard-Luca Brüning, Andreas Neff","doi":"10.1007/s10006-025-01369-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This exploratory study aimed to determine whether non-experts in the field of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are capable of correctly assessing various intra-articular TMDs based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and whether supplementing corresponding arthroscopic imaging findings will enhance accuracy of their assessments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Non-experts for the purposes of this study were recruited from German dental students. After a focused instruction on TMDs, they completed two evaluation rounds to identify and assess selected pathologies of arthrogenic TMDs in patient cases. Initially, participants were provided with MRI images only; in a second round, additional arthroscopic video material was provided. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate responses, and inter-rater reliability among non-experts was determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>94 participants evaluated a total of 30 MRI scans of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) obtained from 27 patients who had also undergone arthroscopy. Their assessment showed the relatively highest agreement with the correct diagnosis for disc perforations (68.2-71.9%) and when using both MRI and arthroscopy material. Synovitis showed the lowest agreement, and was more successfully detected based on arthroscopy (47.2%) alone. Overall, there was only slight to fair agreement among the study participants across diagnoses (Kappa 0.074-0.358). Non-experts showed significant inconsistencies in interpreting MRI and arthroscopic imaging, with only limited concordance with the actual diagnosis and an agreement rate of less than 71.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dental students/Non-experts are unlikely to effectively interpret MRIs for the management of intra-articular TMDs based solely on their academic training. Enhanced curricular and postgraduate education in this area is therefore strongly recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":47251,"journal":{"name":"Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg","volume":"29 1","pages":"74"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11937182/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can provision of additional arthroscopic video material improve accuracy of assessment of temporomandibular joint disorders by dental Non-experts vs. MRI alone: An exploratory study in 3rd to 5th year German dental students.\",\"authors\":\"Yannick Rösner, Lennard-Luca Brüning, Andreas Neff\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10006-025-01369-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This exploratory study aimed to determine whether non-experts in the field of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are capable of correctly assessing various intra-articular TMDs based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and whether supplementing corresponding arthroscopic imaging findings will enhance accuracy of their assessments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Non-experts for the purposes of this study were recruited from German dental students. After a focused instruction on TMDs, they completed two evaluation rounds to identify and assess selected pathologies of arthrogenic TMDs in patient cases. Initially, participants were provided with MRI images only; in a second round, additional arthroscopic video material was provided. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate responses, and inter-rater reliability among non-experts was determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>94 participants evaluated a total of 30 MRI scans of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) obtained from 27 patients who had also undergone arthroscopy. Their assessment showed the relatively highest agreement with the correct diagnosis for disc perforations (68.2-71.9%) and when using both MRI and arthroscopy material. Synovitis showed the lowest agreement, and was more successfully detected based on arthroscopy (47.2%) alone. Overall, there was only slight to fair agreement among the study participants across diagnoses (Kappa 0.074-0.358). Non-experts showed significant inconsistencies in interpreting MRI and arthroscopic imaging, with only limited concordance with the actual diagnosis and an agreement rate of less than 71.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dental students/Non-experts are unlikely to effectively interpret MRIs for the management of intra-articular TMDs based solely on their academic training. Enhanced curricular and postgraduate education in this area is therefore strongly recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11937182/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-025-01369-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-025-01369-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Can provision of additional arthroscopic video material improve accuracy of assessment of temporomandibular joint disorders by dental Non-experts vs. MRI alone: An exploratory study in 3rd to 5th year German dental students.
Purpose: This exploratory study aimed to determine whether non-experts in the field of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are capable of correctly assessing various intra-articular TMDs based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and whether supplementing corresponding arthroscopic imaging findings will enhance accuracy of their assessments.
Methods: Non-experts for the purposes of this study were recruited from German dental students. After a focused instruction on TMDs, they completed two evaluation rounds to identify and assess selected pathologies of arthrogenic TMDs in patient cases. Initially, participants were provided with MRI images only; in a second round, additional arthroscopic video material was provided. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate responses, and inter-rater reliability among non-experts was determined.
Results: 94 participants evaluated a total of 30 MRI scans of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) obtained from 27 patients who had also undergone arthroscopy. Their assessment showed the relatively highest agreement with the correct diagnosis for disc perforations (68.2-71.9%) and when using both MRI and arthroscopy material. Synovitis showed the lowest agreement, and was more successfully detected based on arthroscopy (47.2%) alone. Overall, there was only slight to fair agreement among the study participants across diagnoses (Kappa 0.074-0.358). Non-experts showed significant inconsistencies in interpreting MRI and arthroscopic imaging, with only limited concordance with the actual diagnosis and an agreement rate of less than 71.9%.
Conclusion: Dental students/Non-experts are unlikely to effectively interpret MRIs for the management of intra-articular TMDs based solely on their academic training. Enhanced curricular and postgraduate education in this area is therefore strongly recommended.
期刊介绍：
Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery founded as Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie is a peer-reviewed online journal. It is designed for clinicians as well as researchers.The quarterly journal offers comprehensive coverage of new techniques, important developments and innovative ideas in oral and maxillofacial surgery and interdisciplinary aspects of cranial, facial and oral diseases and their management. The journal publishes papers of the highest scientific merit and widest possible scope on work in oral and maxillofacial surgery as well as supporting specialties. Practice-oriented articles help improve the methods used in oral and maxillofacial surgery.Every aspect of oral and maxillofacial surgery is fully covered through a range of invited review articles, clinical and research articles, technical notes, abstracts, and case reports. Specific topics are: aesthetic facial surgery, clinical pathology, computer-assisted surgery, congenital and craniofacial deformities, dentoalveolar surgery, head and neck oncology, implant dentistry, oral medicine, orthognathic surgery, reconstructive surgery, skull base surgery, TMJ and trauma.Time-limited reviewing and electronic processing allow to publish articles as fast as possible. Accepted articles are rapidly accessible online.Clinical studies submitted for publication have to include a declaration that they have been approved by an ethical committee according to the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki 1964 (last amendment during the 52nd World Medical Association General Assembly, Edinburgh, Scotland, October 2000). Experimental animal studies have to be carried out according to the principles of laboratory animal care (NIH publication No 86-23, revised 1985).
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
