患者对心脏康复患者报告的结果测量(PRO-Heart-DK)的可接受性——使用可接受性理论框架的混合方法研究

IF 2.4 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Emma Dedic, Heidi Sønderby Vistisen, Ann-Dorthe Zwisler, Bente Faurby Pedersen, Karin Lundsby Kappel, Helle Kanstrup, Rikke Elmose Mols, Cecilie Lindström Egholm
{"title":"患者对心脏康复患者报告的结果测量(PRO-Heart-DK)的可接受性——使用可接受性理论框架的混合方法研究","authors":"Emma Dedic, Heidi Sønderby Vistisen, Ann-Dorthe Zwisler, Bente Faurby Pedersen, Karin Lundsby Kappel, Helle Kanstrup, Rikke Elmose Mols, Cecilie Lindström Egholm","doi":"10.1186/s41687-024-00831-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The integration of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROM) in cardiac rehabilitation practice has potential to enhance patient involvement and management. User acceptance is crucial for successful implementation of healthcare interventions, but limited literature addresses PROM acceptability among cardiovascular patients. This study explored the acceptability of a new national PROM in cardiac rehabilitation clinical practice for patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) in Denmark.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who responded to the PROM were invited to complete two brief surveys evaluating perceived relevance, usefulness, and satisfaction. A purposefully selected subsample participated in semi structured interviews to gather in-depth experiences. A parallel convergent mixed-methods design was used with the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability applied to structure and interpret findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>105 and 119 patients respectively responded to the two evaluation surveys (response-rates 56.5% and 53.4% respectively) and 25 patients were interviewed. The study showed a strong willingness to engage with PROMs, indicating a high overall acceptability. Most patients perceived the PROM helpful for preparation and enhancing communication during consultations. A minority of patients reported emotional reactions and experienced issues with questionnaire comprehensiveness, structure, and relevance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings indicate that most IHD patients find PROM relevant and useful in cardiac rehabilitation. To enhance acceptability and, hence, future implementation, improvements are needed in clinical settings by providing adequate patient information, effectively using PRO results, and addressing patients' emotional reactions. Additionally, PROM development should focus on ensuring the questionnaire's relevance, comprehensiveness, and structure.</p>","PeriodicalId":36660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","volume":"9 1","pages":"35"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11937467/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patients' acceptability of a patient-reported outcome measure in cardiac rehabilitation (the PRO-Heart-DK)-a mixed methods study using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability.\",\"authors\":\"Emma Dedic, Heidi Sønderby Vistisen, Ann-Dorthe Zwisler, Bente Faurby Pedersen, Karin Lundsby Kappel, Helle Kanstrup, Rikke Elmose Mols, Cecilie Lindström Egholm\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41687-024-00831-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The integration of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROM) in cardiac rehabilitation practice has potential to enhance patient involvement and management. User acceptance is crucial for successful implementation of healthcare interventions, but limited literature addresses PROM acceptability among cardiovascular patients. This study explored the acceptability of a new national PROM in cardiac rehabilitation clinical practice for patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) in Denmark.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who responded to the PROM were invited to complete two brief surveys evaluating perceived relevance, usefulness, and satisfaction. A purposefully selected subsample participated in semi structured interviews to gather in-depth experiences. A parallel convergent mixed-methods design was used with the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability applied to structure and interpret findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>105 and 119 patients respectively responded to the two evaluation surveys (response-rates 56.5% and 53.4% respectively) and 25 patients were interviewed. The study showed a strong willingness to engage with PROMs, indicating a high overall acceptability. Most patients perceived the PROM helpful for preparation and enhancing communication during consultations. A minority of patients reported emotional reactions and experienced issues with questionnaire comprehensiveness, structure, and relevance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings indicate that most IHD patients find PROM relevant and useful in cardiac rehabilitation. To enhance acceptability and, hence, future implementation, improvements are needed in clinical settings by providing adequate patient information, effectively using PRO results, and addressing patients' emotional reactions. Additionally, PROM development should focus on ensuring the questionnaire's relevance, comprehensiveness, and structure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36660,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11937467/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-024-00831-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-024-00831-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在心脏康复实践中整合患者报告结果测量(PROM)有可能提高患者的参与和管理。用户接受是成功实施医疗保健干预措施的关键,但有限的文献解决PROM在心血管患者中的可接受性。本研究探讨了新的国家PROM在丹麦缺血性心脏病(IHD)患者心脏康复临床实践中的可接受性。方法:邀请对PROM有反应的患者完成两项简短的调查,评估感知相关性、有用性和满意度。有目的地选择子样本参加半结构化访谈,以收集深入的经验。采用平行收敛混合方法设计,可接受性理论框架应用于结构和解释结果。结果:两项评价调查分别有105例和119例患者应答,应答率分别为56.5%和53.4%,共访谈25例患者。研究表明,学生对prom有很强的参与意愿,这表明他们的总体接受度很高。大多数患者认为胎膜早破有助于会诊前的准备和加强沟通。少数患者报告情绪反应和经历问卷的全面性、结构和相关性问题。结论:大多数IHD患者认为胎膜早破与心脏康复相关且有用。为了提高可接受性和未来的实施,需要在临床环境中提供足够的患者信息,有效地使用PRO结果,并解决患者的情绪反应。此外,PROM的开发应注重确保问卷的相关性、全面性和结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patients' acceptability of a patient-reported outcome measure in cardiac rehabilitation (the PRO-Heart-DK)-a mixed methods study using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability.

Background: The integration of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROM) in cardiac rehabilitation practice has potential to enhance patient involvement and management. User acceptance is crucial for successful implementation of healthcare interventions, but limited literature addresses PROM acceptability among cardiovascular patients. This study explored the acceptability of a new national PROM in cardiac rehabilitation clinical practice for patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) in Denmark.

Methods: Patients who responded to the PROM were invited to complete two brief surveys evaluating perceived relevance, usefulness, and satisfaction. A purposefully selected subsample participated in semi structured interviews to gather in-depth experiences. A parallel convergent mixed-methods design was used with the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability applied to structure and interpret findings.

Results: 105 and 119 patients respectively responded to the two evaluation surveys (response-rates 56.5% and 53.4% respectively) and 25 patients were interviewed. The study showed a strong willingness to engage with PROMs, indicating a high overall acceptability. Most patients perceived the PROM helpful for preparation and enhancing communication during consultations. A minority of patients reported emotional reactions and experienced issues with questionnaire comprehensiveness, structure, and relevance.

Conclusion: The findings indicate that most IHD patients find PROM relevant and useful in cardiac rehabilitation. To enhance acceptability and, hence, future implementation, improvements are needed in clinical settings by providing adequate patient information, effectively using PRO results, and addressing patients' emotional reactions. Additionally, PROM development should focus on ensuring the questionnaire's relevance, comprehensiveness, and structure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信